Are they slavs?

are they slavs?

Attached: 1565273368520.jpg (318x242, 47K)

Other urls found in this thread:

eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Attached: 1565056078674.jpg (1836x1080, 295K)

Genetically kinda
linguistically no

west hungary - slavs
east hungary - mongols

Please point out the Slavc gene.

No.

Yes

>The Father Tongue hypothesis proposes that humans tend to speak their father's language. It is based on the discovery, in 1997, of a closer correlation between language and Y-chromosomal variation than between language and mitochondrial DNA variation.
>The other well-known exception is Hungarian. The N1c haplogroup of the Y chromosome, distinguished by Tat-C deletion, is found at a high frequency throughout Uralic language communities, but is virtually missing in Hungarian males. Therefore, while the intrusion of the Magyars into what is today Hungary is historically attested and has left clear linguistic evidence, genetically the Magyar intrusion has left no salient genetic traces. Instead, from a genetic point of view, Hungarians strongly resemble a Western Slavic language community.

Delete this

Yes, we are (genetically) Slavs and Gypsies speaking a Finno-Ugric language.

>Father Tongue hypothesis
Yes because it was the dads who raised the children.
>Uralic language communities, but is virtually missing in Hungarian male
Most Hungarians deny that we have anything to do with Finns. These data is based on random selection. Come back when you got smaples from every male. Also it says nothing about the our ancestors haploshit.


>strongly resemble a Western Slavic language community.
Can you point the original Western Slavic gene? Could it be not possible that Western Slavs did the same to the Central Europeans?

No, We are Magyar

Both parents raise the kids but they all primarily used and ended up passing down the language of their father. Except for Hungarians and Baltis in Pakistan.

So you are telling me that Celts, Pannonians, Romans, Schytian, Iazyges, Sarmatians, Huns, Avars, Goths, Gepids, Langobards, Dacians, Illyrians, Thracians, Bulgars, South Slavs, Hungarians, Kabars, East Slavs, Cumans, Swabians, Jews, Romanians left no genetic markers except only the West Slavs?

The quote I posted is specifically about Y-chromosomal haplogroups, not genetic markers in general. And as for Hungarians the markers on the patrilineal genes are Slavic, not Uralic.

Interesting. So does this mean that Hungarian men just raped the women of other people's and raised the kids as Hungarians? Big if true. So in other nations the women fucked the men of other countries and raised the kids with an absent father? Goddamn, so we Hungarians really the white people of all people.

Isn't that usually how mongol invasions went done

I guess it is, but it's fascinating that you can actually prove this with DNA sequencing and shit.

a fair bit, the original population was almost wiped out and repopulated numerous times by slavs, germans, balkanites, cumans, etc, so at this point most modern hungarians are a German-Slav-Balkanite blend, depending on where you go in the country. That said, there are still some markers present in the modern population

Attached: ahonfoglalaskoriesamaelomgyarpopulaciokmtdnshaplocsoportjai.jpg (2498x3690, 1.93M)

some various PCAs

Attached: PCA_dna9.png (998x666, 67K)

Attached: 1563174497241.jpg (1001x601, 183K)

Attached: VluHvyldin0.jpg (1193x541, 187K)

Attached: PCA.png (1485x770, 177K)

>genes have ethnicity/language
Haplouautism was a mistake.
It's like that late 19th century bs about European "races".

Attached: 1203410433442.jpg (1024x772, 136K)

I2 dna is the only true slav dna

Attached: 1525860873047.jpg (1455x856, 159K)

Attached: pca.jpg (1440x1080, 153K)

Attached: Europe_Genetic_Map.png (986x1118, 854K)

Cuturally kinda.
Linguistically no.
Genetically has no scientific meaning.

all i got

Attached: l50NbeH_d.jpg (640x639, 61K)

This is how Hungarians were made, do not reply.

Attached: 1561462980424.png (922x988, 122K)

Attached: osi_magyar.jpg (1431x800, 194K)

Wtf is E3b? Greek phenotype? Apparently we have more than the Austrians but other than that we're pretty much the same?

I wouldn't trust that one too much desu, some other ones I've seen has different levels. I'm pretty sure all of them source Eupedia, but I guess data was taken at different intervals, and they've changed since
eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml

Attached: 1543060598868.png (1960x1793, 865K)

Wtf is "others" and why does Austria have that much?

ones not included in the chart, Austria might have a different variant of G, you can check in the link I posted

Ultra aryan genes from atlantis.

So you are telling me that Celts, Pannonians, Romans, Schytian, Iazyges, Sarmatians, Huns, Avars, Goths, Gepids, Langobards, Dacians, Illyrians, Thracians, Bulgars, South Slavs, Hungarians, Kabars, East Slavs, Cumans, Swabians, Jews, Romanians left no Y-chromosomal haplogroups except only the West Slavs?

Meant to

>Genetically has no scientific meaning.
Ecco il piddino