Where do you see these countries in the next decade or two?

>lmao, look at this dude.
The fucking communists are ruining everything plus the invasion of caribean immigrants... we're doomed

Attached: 1999.png (470x470, 244K)

It's probably for three main reasons:
1. Modern alliances such has NATO have made wars much more difficult to start a war and have kept global peace relatively stable for a while now.
2. Since most of the LatAm countries are very young there aren't any country old grudges or claims like in Europe that fuel justifications for war.
3. The countries are more focused on fixing their own issues than starting some dumb war.

Brazil goes full fascistoid and expands their territory into Cono Sur.
Venezuela gets occupied by USA and annexed to Colombia
Based Sendero Luminoso will make a comeback in Peru.
Hopefully a Marxist-Leninist revolution happens in Central America
The rest keep being cucked Social Democracies at best

Attached: 9057D7F7-509F-4E1D-A188-F09DD224FC47.png (195x255, 128K)

>Shit used to happen over there in your countries all the time but nowadays its seems pretty chill
no
our last big war was over 100years ago.

we are all latin american brothers/friends.

>Shit used to happen over there in your countries all the time but nowadays its seems pretty chill
Only during colonial times and not nearly as widespread between Latam states as you think.

It's mostly because of a shared/relatable history, religion and cultures. Anti-imperialism/anti-west sentiment and a pro-Latam mindset is common in every Latam country.

Attached: 1630196804824.jpg (2000x2500, 583K)

>3. The countries are more focused on fixing their own issues than starting some dumb war.
More like:
>Our CIAniggers did a good job

Perú wiII try their best!

Attached: 37332678_p2_master1200.jpg (293x293, 13K)

We all hate each other but we have more important things to worry about like crime and poverty.

>We all hate each other
no we don't, you are just a poor fag that have never leave his country.

???
I can only think of like 4 major wars between states in Latin America and 3 of them happened in the 1800s. If anything, Latin America is probably the most peaceful region on Earth when it comes to wars.

at leat post the complete map you amerishart

Attached: Latinamerica updated map.png (550x550, 92K)

we are peaceful people, remember that we didn't harm a single civilian during the malvinas war.

:^)

I think so. The biggest conflict in this region is between people and the government. If I were to participate in a war in Latin America it would be a war between Latin American people and the bureaucrats, I'd round them all up and toss them into concentration camps to be gassed, "left" and "right" alike.

based

Half being fucked by right wing assholes, half being fucked by left wing assholes, so preetty much bussines as usual

>central america and mexico
Because the US is still the unchallenged global power and this is their backyard.
>south america
Because Brazil has stable borders and always plays nice cause doesn't want spanish speaking countries to form a coalition against it.
In the Pacific side it's because everyone hates Bolivia (for some reason) and they're too weak to do anything.

>Because Brazil has stable borders and always plays nice cause doesn't want spanish speaking countries to form a coalition against it.
Where did you even get this bs. We don't "play" nice, we are generally nice to each other because we have many things in common and no reason whatsoever to start wars. And Hispanic countries are not all the same as you think, and neither is Brazil between the states.

>In the Pacific side it's because everyone hates Bolivia (for some reason)
Yeah, "for some reason", definitely not because their commie dictator is an edgy piece of shit.

>Where did you even get this bs
From 142 years of brazillian foreign policy, since the war of Paraguay.

Also i doubt people hating Bolivia has much to do with Evo Morales and more with historical grudges over past wars with its neighbors, though Bolivia lost more from those than any of them.

You may not be as knowledge as you think, my coxinha friend.

BR going fascist mode and removing all leftkebabs, ESPECIALLY liberals (social or economic), becoming the eternal bastion of the right worldwide

Attached: global firepower latin america.png (1060x2445, 390K)

That's how I view eastern europe

>From 142 years of brazillian foreign policy
Such as?

>Also i doubt people hating Bolivia has much to do with Evo Morales
Yeah it's not like he's nationalizing our private companies in Bolivia or anything.

>and more with historical grudges over past wars with its neighbors
Neither Peruvians nor Chileans hate Bolivians, the main problem is the economic situation in Bolivia pushing Bolivians to migrate to other countries in search of better opportunities, and due to a lack of education they end up in ghettos, but nobody actually hates them.

You sound like a delusional autist making shit up to appear as if there's some dark conflict between Hispanic countries and Brazil, actually delusional. And the only country in all of Latin America that we actually had a serious beef with was Argentina because of Uruguay-chan, and the Paraguayan War actually helped fix that. Our relations have only improved ever since. Paraná also has a much closer relationship with Paraguay than they do with Brazil.

>Such as?
The war of Paraguay started after a brazillian military intervention in Uruguay. Paraguay wanted to use this as an excuse to unite its neighbors against Brazil (which failed).
Since then Brazil never ever tried something like that again, despite being perfectly capable of it being much stronger than its neighbors.

>Neither Peruvians nor Chileans hate Bolivians
If you say so.

>as if there's some dark conflict between Hispanic countries and Brazil
I'm am literally explaining why there ISN'T a conflict, what are you talking about?

>after a brazillian military intervention in Uruguay
Uruguay used to be a Brazilian province, you dim.

>despite being perfectly capable of it being much stronger than its neighbors
You're actually delusional.

>If you say so.
They themselves say so.

>I'm am literally explaining why there ISN'T a conflict
And you're 100% wrong. See Unlike other regions in the world we're actually homogeneous. Same religion, similar history, similar culture, similar language, similar hatred for western countries and so on.

>Uruguay used to be a Brazilian province, you dim.
The war of Paraguay was quite a bit after their independence. You shouldn't assume everyone is as ignorant of history as you.

>You're actually delusional.
So you are saying Brazil is in fact not significantly stronger than its neighbors?

>And you're 100% wrong
So if i'm 100% wrong, that means you're saying there IS a lot of conflict?
You're just disagreeing with me automatically without even thinking about what you're saying.

>So you are saying Brazil is in fact not significantly stronger than its neighbors?
No, we're not, especially when standardized by population and territory. I would bet big money you're a Bolsomerda fanboy.

>that means you're saying there IS a lot of conflict?
lol autism. Your reasons for why there is no conflict in Latin America are 100% wrong. Pan-Latinism is still the #1 populist trope used by left-wing politicians to farm votes, all you have to do to become a popular politician is to be blatant about how much you hate the west and that we must unite Latin America against them.

Bolsomerda fanboys like you truly believe this "muh Brazil stronk" bs and that the only reason we're not having a genocidal war with our neighbors is because of a stalemate. Give me a fucking break.

Attached: foro-de-sao-paulo_foto-xavier-granja-cedeno-ministerio-relaciones-exteriores.jpg (2048x1151, 450K)

>No, we're not, especially when standardized by population and territory.
China is also much weaker than its neighbors "standardized by population and territory". What a completely irrelevant thing consider. Brazil is stronger than its neighbors because it's big. It doesn't necessarily need any other reason.

Brazilian voters just don't care all that much about foreign policy. It was never decisive for any election.

That said, i realize now you are quite naive.
The US government still invades countries for economic reasons all the time. Today.
Russia and Ukraine have shared most of their history and are now at each others' throats.
And yet you think Brazil has good relations with its neighbors just because we're nice, and friends.
War happens for a reason, and so does peace.

Also i hate Bolsonaro so you'll have to find a different label to stick in my face.

I see, we better watch out for those spics before they attack us amirite. Any moment now.

Attached: o médio falou pra não contrariar.jpg (1200x1200, 179K)

Should I invest in Brazil or the Spanish speaking countries?

I would love to see Brasil become a monarchy again!

That would be weird, would that be the first time aa country has gone from being a republic to a monarchy? I wonder how the world would react.

Politically interesting!

The southern cone empire is established

Attached: 249px-Southern_cone.png (249x397, 29K)

Why though? It's within the realm of possibility, albeit unlikely. Most Brazilians have favorable views about the Brazilian Empire because of Pedro II and negative views of the republic because of all the corruption and how our country began to sink after we adopted the republican system. One of our elected congressman is a member of our royal family and a popular conservative spokesman.

What would be the legal hoops of making Brazil a monarchy again? Would there have to be some revolution or is there a way it could be done peacefully?

If they would unite into one country; El Cono Sur, I will move there.
Firstly I am a Monarchist, and second, I think if Brazil reclaimed its empire, the world would respect it more and having the emperor back would bring pride and dignity back to the Brazilian people

Where do you fall on the Monarchism scale? Constitutional or Absolute? Elective or Hereditary?

Hereditary. Somewhere between absolute and constitutional because absolute gives too much power to one ruler, but as we've seen from current European kingdoms, the monarch is a figurehead. Imo, the monarch needs to have a certain level of power, just not absolute.

>What would be the legal hoops of making Brazil a monarchy again?
The congress would have to approve a referendum and pass with at least 60% of support, and that's it. We would obviously need a monarchist majority in the congress for that to happen though. I think most of our elected conservative congressmen are favorable to the monarchist movement, including Bolsonaro. Luiz Philippe of Orléans-Braganza almost became our vice-president.

>Would there have to be some revolution or is there a way it could be done peacefully?
It could be achieved peacefully with no problem whatsoever if the monarchist movement had more popular support.

>I wonder how the world would react.
There would be a massive leftist meltdown with the international mainstream media talking about slavery without actually mentioning the facts about who Pedro II actually was and what he did, but that's their standard these days with any conservative figure or movement. Other than that I don't think there be too much repercussion.

It wouldn't be called Empire of Brazil though, but rather Kingdom of Brazil.

>and having the emperor back would bring pride and dignity back to the Brazilian people
I guess, our royal family is staunchly conservative and Catholic so they would lead by example, the question here is for how long. I can't think of any royal family today other than the Yamato Dynasty that actually contribute to preserve the traditional values, they're all globalist shills.

>Firstly I am a Monarchist
How is the monarchist movement in America and how would you choose the monarch?

I never knew why Brazil was called the Imperio do Brasil. What empire? A kingdom will do nicely. It's worth a shot. If your royal family can bring a sense of unity based on Catholic values then great!.

Lol I don't even think there is an American monarchist movement at all.

The republican coup was a huge fucking mistake.
If the monarchy had lasted, i would support maintaining it.
However it has been gone for so long i don't think there would be a point in bringing it back.

No idea why it was called an empire considering it seceded from the Kingdom of Brazil, Portugal and the Algarves.

>If your royal family can bring a sense of unity based on Catholic values then great!
We're already a fairly united nation overall, still practicing Christian and conservative, our previous leftist governments promoting degeneracy and wrecking our economy was the main reason why Bolsonaro got elected and the monarchist movement become more widely known.

I don't like Christianity at all though, or any form of religion that isn't animist in nature, but it's still better than western nihilism.

>Lol I don't even think there is an American monarchist movement at all.
americanmonarchistsociety.com/

Not sure if they would be considered a movement though.

>i don't think there would be a point in bringing it back.
The House of Orléans-Braganza is a huge part of our national identity. We severed a big chunk of our identity the moment we instated this republican system, and Pedro II is still widely regarded as the greatest leader this country ever had, plus the fact that he was our last monarch.

Most people at the bottom half of our country have a visceral hate-boner for Brasília, reinstating our monarchy would feel like a rebirth.

Attached: familiaimperial.jpg (610x616, 94K)