Amerindians are closely related to East Asians. Why are they so much dumber?

free aztlan

Amerindians were actually the fastest evolving civilization. They started 3500 years after the others though.

this but unironically

Attached: ted.jpg (640x453, 108K)

2 out of 5 craddles of civilization are native american despite representing less than 5% of the world population at the time

>Amerindians are closely related to East Asians
To Siberians user, not East Asians

And living in a logistical nightmare of a rain forest.

so what's it like having inferior spatial and verbal intelligence?

My Aztec ancestors built this in only 2 centuries

Attached: causas-de-la-conquista-de-tenochtitlan.jpg (4000x2587, 2.1M)

Feels like not being a fat fuck

>pic
why isn't Quebec labelled as part of Latin America?

can't eat a lot of burger

I fucking hate amerimongrels so fucking much.

we are bad drivers, not much else

Americans' biggest hidrances regarding development was geography and animal power. Most of the continent is filled with mountains, earthquackes are common and the seas are impossible to navigate without modern technology. If you compare the relatively calm Med sea, flat as fuck Europe and the avaliability of horses, it comes as a surprise how people could buil shit like Chichén Itzá using their own hands

>we

What's with the tribal inclusion? How high's your angry andid negrito component? Have you taken a DNA test?

I was talking about my country dumbass, peruvians are bad drivers simple as

>this amount of cope from mexishits
seethe harder

Attached: typicalmexicanslum.jpg (600x404, 84K)

yeah whatever anglocope

Attached: 1536453842326.jpg (1192x1235, 725K)

keep seething please

Attached: que.jpg (651x400, 337K)

>whites destroyed ancient civilisations and replaced them with slums and strip malls

Attached: oh shit nigga what are you doing.jpg (800x450, 62K)

Attached: 1519357877940.gif (900x597, 3.82M)

>Amerindians are closely related to East Asians. Why are they so much dumber?

Spanish genes

This, they were polluted by the moor rape babies.

this makes me hopeful for central/south america's future. but care to explain why even with first world nutrition and education, mestizos still have lower IQs?

peru is based

there is no evidence of this outside of the US, and in the US most mestizos live in poor neighborhoods with shit education

but even adjusting for socio-economic factors, it's true. whites and asians living in same areas and going to same schools still out perform mestizo peers significantly

source that isnt test scores?

Mestizos are handicapped by Spanish genes
In places where white and Spanish people live together you often find whites outperform Spanish tenfold. In marbella for example white people live in villas and drive Porsches whole Spanish live in apartments and drive scooters

They’re related to the indigenous Siberians, not really a high IQ group compared to the Japanese and the Koreans, for one.

Most latin americans are triracial mongrels not amerindians

there's a ton of data on this and test scores are correlated enough with IQ that they're worth looking at. i learned most from the bell curve and another book talking about how socio-economic explanations for gaps come up short. all the data points to the gap existing but it's nice to know that mestizos might have a hidden potential. remember that just because they have positive SNPs doesn't mean they don't have a higher amount of negative ones as well, there are lots of factors to genetic intelligence we don't understand.

so i'm saying don't get too bogged down in one study about certain genetic markers that correlate with intelligence, when the practical studies all show mestizos coming up short. if they were truly as high or higher, they would rapidly ascend into the upper middle class like asians do

negative IQ SNP's are being measured on the study already, the score is from both positive and negative ones weighted

Attached: 1565331637599.png (1058x1447, 146K)

Its 4 studies, not just 1, and its not just some, its 74 different loci involving hundreds of different genes.

the peruvinan poster is dishonest

we don't know all the markers of intelligence or what they do. we don't have the ability to analyze a fetus's dna and predict if they will have the potential to be the next aristotle. that is why practical testing of individuals in necessary, not studies with early/limited knowledge on genetic markers. you're making grand claims off of speculation

Statistical data comes after genetic data, all studies in social fields are secondary and epiphenomenal to natural/hard fields

Latinos are more mongrelized than any other group of people
Mestizos are also part nigger

i get that, but even when controlling for social like we said, the gap still exists. meaning we don't know everything about the genetics of intelligence yet so the testing + control for factors is the most practical way for now

also we only find the genetic data after first having the statistical data and finding a correlation between the two.

Again, your data is not even firsthanded and its based of test scores which understimate latinos in poor socioeconomic factors, italians had IQ's lower than mexicans during the migration era and never escalated to the top of american social ladder despite having normal IQ's in their home country 100 years after, i and anyone realistic should embrace genetic data over projected statistics

And this is the exact reason why the statistical model is questioned when it doesnt correlate completely to the hard data

You are cute

Attached: 1565251362073.jpg (720x720, 55K)

truly based and redpilled

>And this is the exact reason why the statistical model is questioned when it doesnt correlate completely to the hard data
the hard data COMES from the statistical model, so it should be the exact opposite. you need to look into twin studies

we have a historical past reflecting attempts to reform the country into something other than a cashcow always ending in murders, prisons, coups d'état, civil wars, foreign intervention, dictatorships, and so on, the same might've happened with other latin american countries.

Catholicism encouraged the conquerors to take natives and convert them so eventually the Catholic colonies became more fragmented societies, with many castes in constant dispute and very unequal levels of education and access to resources.

Modern ones have suffered through centuries of exploitation and malnutrition but ancient Natives were pretty smart all things considered.
>Aztecs built a city in the middle of a lake with complex hydraulic systems
>Mayans had very advanced astronomy knowledge, they calculated the circumference of Earth with even more accuracy than Europeans.
>Incas had a proto-communist society which worked without markets
Not to mention the food engineering they all did to create modern corn, potatoes, etc.

fuck wh*Tes