Link Mainnet

There won't be mainnet in September or October.

Attached: 1536289907908.png (491x752, 160K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cc4/f4fd36ad5b1ce0af320c545a79749e601700.pdf
arxiv.org/pdf/1012.2529.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I've been saying all along...june 2019 is hopeful. They are literally telling people we are not close and people close their ears. There is so much work to do.

>june 2019
This, 2020 is more likely

LINKERS BTFO

MUH MAINNET

Sergey is laughing at you pathetic RETARDS

Attached: 318271da980706f7a18a811c3456a77d--protective-dogs-friendship.jpg (633x758, 62K)

Patience. Good things come to those who wait.

Attached: fc5bb00b.jpg (900x900, 62K)

B-but Dreamforce

Attached: 1531795400024.jpg (800x781, 83K)

>over a year

LMAO enjoy swingtrading this for another whole fucking year linkies AHAHA

Good. Cashing out a retirement fund I had left over in a month. Putting it in link.

What a relief. More time to accumulate.

This is mental illness

Everyone is thinking that it will launch in September, but thats so fucking optimistic. unless the team have outsourced a shit load of work in secret. the reputation system literally is what makes link the 1000$ meme. i f they are just starting it then then it confirms we have a while to go, and we know they wont launch a half baked product because they have no reason to. 2020, or if they really get their act together 2019 is feasible.

Also, when you look on the github and see their commits its impressive, but looking at exactly what hthey are trying to do with the reputation system and its a bit obvious that there is a lot fo work to be done, and anyone with ANY knowledge of C+and Linux custom script integrated GNU compilers knows it's a minimum 2-3 year AT BEST with a single coder, maybe less with more.

Link devs took the hard route of going for a SE Linux hardened kernel integration into their scripting tool - PRO TIP, since they are using it as part of the foundation for main-net, it is essential it is 100% complete, and with investors like Swift its not going to be fucking risked launching early.

Even Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux) took 2 years to compile a similar scripting tool.

Meh, I got a year to spare.

I'm almost 38... my cock might not even work in a year

Don't worry you'll have enough to hire a dozen nigger bulls

Just checked and this isn’t even real and I’m the telegram, nice try fudders

Any of you faggots have a link to the slack/telegram.

Nice pasta. Fuckk offf

Attached: photo_2018-09-06_14-22-07.jpg (640x1136, 64K)

Attached: Capture.png (487x443, 65K)

It's real, Just checked. It was posted yesterday (9/6/18) at 1:55pm PST

If mainnet would come out in September we would know.
No one keeps their mainnet release date a secret.

Actually thinking about that.... hire 1k an hour escorts to watch then get fuckes by a nigger.

Might have to start learning to be turned on by this.

My question is do you have to pay the nigger also to fuck the escort?

I'm guessing not since a nigger will fuck anything

Jesus christ, just get some viagra. Alao eat better

Linkies are in denial

LINKIES BTFO

The newfags who think Chainlink are suddenly going to say "ta da!" and release the full network are cancer, hopefully this sends them away for another six months or so.

Thank fuck. Means they won't be releasing in a bear market and I can ccumulate to 50k linkies
>t. coping stinker

Attached: 1517868705112.jpg (379x339, 20K)

Its not that far away as they have been working mostly on bug fixes and operator UI in the pivotal tracker

I don't think you realize the amount of coding (and more importantly testing that a reputation system would take.)

I’m happy for this
Gives me time to buy cheap stinky linky

For fucks sake, that little faggot the other day promising mainnet within 3 weeks confirmed larp. Now I'm gonna have to look for a job again.

Until the team themselves clarify things no one actually knows how long it'll take so at this point, the one who wins this argument is who shouts louder and more aggressively. "AHHAHAHAHAHA LINKIES BTFO MAINNET IN 2020" and the like. No one here is directly involved with the team, and so no one knows what actually needs to be done before mainnet launch.
>I don't think you realize the amount of coding (and more importantly testing that a reputation system would take.)
Like this one for example

It's probably going to take longer than what everyone assumed before though

Operator UI just means there's a basic dashboard for people to play with on the testnet. Then they have to code how all the node responses are securely aggregated. Then they have to code the reputation system that allows nodes to demonstrate their reliability. Aggregation is a big job but is relatively straightforward, and they have laid out the mechanisms pretty clearly in the whitepaper with the whole "commit/reveal" thing.
But reputation is massive. That is such a difficult concept to get correct from the outset and if you have any vulnerabilities or ways to "game" reputation then your entire network is at risk. I'm not a fudder. I hold 130k LINK and have done since last September. But the reputation system has to be absolutely waterproof AT LAUNCH because otherwise malicious node operators will game themselves into early positions of unfair advantage that will then be entrenched. I wouldn't be surprised if reputation takes 6 months on its own. Everyone needs to chill the fuck out and the "wen moon" faggots need to find another project.

Sounds like it probably won't be this year

How is this more difficult than aggregation? Also, the way you word it seems to imply that reputation is more important than aggregation but aggregation is directly related to the work itself (being an oracle) but the reputation system is only to ensure that no one fucks it up.

Attached: 1518446832581.png (734x604, 114K)

Because reputation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest node operators whereas aggregation just needs to securely pull responses together. Reputation is a potential vulnerability in a way that aggregation is not.

This is quite a relief. I only have 28k, been waiting for btc to jump or for link to dump so that I can all in and double my holdings.Until then I'll keep increasing by a few thousand each week.

Attached: tiddy link.jpg (599x798, 77K)

I know that, it doesn't need to be mentioned that the network needs both to work. You can easily turn it around that aggregation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest data provider, so on and so forth. Regardless, both are important, of course. I'm just trying to figure out why he's so sure that aggregation is easy but reputation is difficult. Similar to your reply, it "just needs to securely pull responses together", emphasis on "just" (lmao). You're both so sure that aggregation is easy work and reputation is this very difficult task

Attached: 1523689406428.png (690x595, 116K)

I laughed at the "Just", not an attempt to mock, just to be clear

Attached: 1520116099932.jpg (217x320, 10K)

>You can easily turn it around that aggregation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest data provider
That's not really cogent. And aggregation isn't "easy", it's incredibly complicated. But reputation is even harder.

How is it harder? Can you actually explain what makes aggregation incredibly complicated but reputation is still more complicated than that? Anyway, digging up info on Telegram about reputation, look at what Thomas said regarding 3rd party reputation providers. What do you think it implies?

Attached: 1536207120840.png (486x521, 125K)

austic retards like you that repost stale paste pasta fud will never make it.

Of this I am quite certain.......

To me, it implies that they only need something simple to get things going. It's not like they'll stop working on it after mainnet launch. To be clear, I'm deliberately arguing that things are going to be completed much sooner rather than later, just to have a different perspective

I prefer what said where
>Everyone needs to chill the fuck out and the "wen moon" faggots need to find another project.

Attached: 1504945819002.png (476x194, 43K)

I interpret this as meaning they need a simple reputation module to complete the overall architecture/infrastructure. Once that is in place, it is easy to hire specialists to develop more advanced reputation modules.

Another comment by Thomas regarding 3rd party reputation providers

Attached: 1526421758575.png (486x389, 99K)

Yeah, and emphasis on the "simple". This is another comment by Thomas, and I think the "reputation scores" mentioned in the pics is this Seems like the bulk of the work would be left to the "specialists" and the like, especially considering that it's an actual "goal" of the team, as mentioned by Thomas. I don't know who these 3rd party reputation providers will be though. Thomas didn't reply to the dude who asked this "Will Chainlink create a platform for kyc/aml for node operators or leave that to a third party/ the ones requesting the data" so there aren't much details regarding those 3rd party reputation providers unfortunately

Attached: 1533365009998.png (495x441, 115K)

I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider. Presumably given that second comment they are prevented from "messing" with reputation scores by the fact that all the metrics used for calculating reputation are public and on-chain. I also wonder if "amount of link held by node" even factors into reputation beyond penalty staking.

So yeah, this news is bullish amirite

Fucking delphi larper convinced me the other day.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1000$ EOND

This thread is the usual faggot swintraders shitposting bullshit dressed as fud that has no merit value or relevence except they are discouraging the spread of info about the project and thus loosing people who might buy and run nodes and therefore reducing the number of nodes and undermining the project....because tgey don't care and just use the token for crappy pnd swingrades and pist shill and fud crap in time with this via discord.They are literally a tumour on the chainlink project and while its a good project their individual autustic intellectual limitations makes them incapable of setting up, maintaining ir running a decent node or data feed. These are a bunch if retards who spent bitcoin on pharma drugs flipped into eth and need to make a few bucks a month off a few hundred eth the flupped into link to buy pharma drugs on tor. Their junkie 9rk lives are replete with piss bottles and fap rags yet due to the varios amphetamine like substances they consume can repeately repaste crap and in their chemical addled brains they suffer delusions of grandeur. Nothing they post here is of any relevence except signaling their poorly orchestated prajeet outsourced script kiddy binance pnd bots moves. The stink of unwashed bodies, piss bottles, stale fap rags and chemical laden sweat and darkened basements emenates from every single link fud thread. However they matter little because their elimination rate due to mental collapse, drug abuse and economic implosion signaled by frenzied desperation trying to live off ever decreasing crypto capital while jobless, skillless and unemployed is high. When a sufficient number of link fudders lives have collapsed into piss stained oblivion clutching empty adderal bottles and neth pipes link will moon as their cremated corpses are poyred into carboard boxes and their mothers mix their grief with the fact they are free of the insufferable and vile burdens they created following that one night stand in a dock bar.

>Mainnet will launch
>We have partners
I don't know which is my favourite meme, I laugh hard at both equally.

Rory also mentioned previously that mainnet would coincide closely with the hiring of a marketing director, which has already been done. I wouldn't underestimate how much these guys have hiding in private repositories

You know whats gonna happen, right? A year from now, link will drop to an all-time low right before launching the mainnet and normies, who have no clue what link is, will buy it at near all time low. They will make a lot more profit from LINK than any of the long time hodlers. Think about it, they have literally no clue wtf link is or does, bought it and held for a week and then dump it to make insane profits while stinky linkies held for years to make close to nothing.

I think it doesn't seem like it if you take into account the way the team repeatedly states that you don't need to own LINK to run a node. So besides penalty payments, it doesn't matter

>I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider.
I'm trying to read shit about nodes right now to figure it out but I'm a brainlet
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cc4/f4fd36ad5b1ce0af320c545a79749e601700.pdf
arxiv.org/pdf/1012.2529.pdf

I don't know if you're serious or not but if you're actually that pissed you might want to install 4chanX (via Violentmonkey) so that you can filter out dumb shit much easier. I can help you if you want

Unless Thomas is lying, they clearly haven't started with the reputation system. No need to make up shit about it

However they matter little because their elimination rate due to mental collapse, drug abuse and economic implosion signaled by frenzied desperation trying to live off ever decreasing crypto capital while jobless, skillless and unemployed is high. When a sufficient number of link fudders lives have collapsed into piss stained oblivion clutching empty adderal bottles and meth pipes link will moon as their cremated corpses are poured into carboard boxes and their mothers mix their grief with the fact they are free of the insufferable and vile burdens they created following that one night stand in a dock bar.

How is millions of dollars close to nothing?? Are you so poor 0.2usd is out of your reach?

Attached: 1536233142346.png (750x959, 1.37M)

I have had this realization but I think the autistic long term holders will have been more educated and developed stronger confidence and will therefore make better profit in the long term. The normies will sell too early and won't be running nodes.

>I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider

"Reputation providers would also be able to charge for that service"

Although, Thomas only indicated that the providers can charge for the service since they'll be using gas. So I don't know how profitable would it be. It still doesn't make much sense so I'll keep digging

Attached: 1534970649266.png (765x241, 37K)

So as a node operator I'll be paying various reputation providers to list me, paying for monetised data feeds to connect to contracts, and crossing my fingers hoping to be selected for enough jobs to run at a profit.
Starting to wish I'd put money into LinkPool.

>So as a node operator I'll be paying various reputation providers to list me

You only need to pay one reputation provider since it'll ultimately rely on on-chain data which seems to imply that there won't be much difference between various reputation providers. I'll ask Thomas what's the point of 3rd party reputation providers and post his reply soon.

Attached: 1523997412901.png (604x509, 201K)

>paying for monetised data feeds to connect to contracts
Not if the API endpoint is open, but yeah

Attached: 1514965423467.png (806x523, 79K)

>and crossing my fingers hoping to be selected for enough jobs to run at a profit.
See paragraph about node selection

I guess it all boils down to having a high reputation so you can get picked. And regarding profitability, let's just hope that there's a high enough usage of the network to keep the money flowing

Attached: 1527871637491.png (774x375, 68K)

Weak fud. Checked the times and no matter what timezone you are on in India it still doesn't change the minutes.

> you don't need to own LINK to run a node
Top kek

anyone explain what this means to a brainlet?

I fucking hate this coin

fuck you for ruining biz

It means we don't have to make shit up in order to determine reputation because it's all on-chain

It means that every piece of information that is used by a reputation provider to calculate the reputation for a particular node is public. So if a reputation provider says "This node has a reputation score of 86%" it should be possible for any person to dive and and confirm that that is true using publicly available information.

Much better answer

tks a lot

The LiNK vision is completely unrelated to their erc30 token
If you want to run the node your linkies are useless
And you have to pay to be verified by Thurs party at least, but maybe even fourth or fifth
Tldr : you fools are their best (or likely the only) source of income and they are going to milk you once again

Why not just start a thread about something you're interested in? I don't understand why you'd go on a LINK thread where actual discussion is happening and whine about it. If your shitcoin is being ignored then start a thread about it and get a discussion going. LINK threads don't prevent you from doing anything you'd otherwise want to do, especially if you just use filters which are easy as fuck.

>still

>where actual discussion is happening
So that actual discussion won't happen, obviously. Like you said, those who aren't financially involved in LINK will just easily ignore these threads. I don't doubt that there are motivated shills that make LINK threads but it's easier to spot coordinated FUD because why bother with the effort if you don't have this coin? Either to (attempt to) suppress the price to buy in lower, or make LINK threads toxic enough that new money (or previous LINK holders who will sell) will be in other coins that they in turn will shill, like HOLO or some other shit.

Checked

you sound like an 0xbtc pajeet
people shit post about link because you faggots clog up the board. its not contained. its not easily ignored.
calling you 1000eoy retards delusional is not fudding, its just being realistic.

Like the previous user said, filters are very easy to use. Do you want me to help you? I've been planning on making a thread about it anyway. I can give you easy to follow instructions right now if you're actually interested in avoiding LINK threads instead of falseflagging as a concerned user.
>You sound like an 0xbtc shill
It's more effective to say "you sound like a paid shill/cultist" because I can just say that I don't own 0xbtc by the way. Especially since you can't exactly contest being blamed a shill.

>clog up the board
Filters and thread hiding takes seconds.

/\bLINK\b/;boards:biz;
/ChainLINK/i;boards:biz;
/Sergey Nazarov/i;boards:biz;
/Sergey/i;boards:biz;
/you are a maniac/i;boards:biz;

Here are some filters you can use that would easily remove 90% LINK content if you are actually serious. For the rest, holding Shift and pressing on threads takes less than a second each thread.

Here are some filters I use by the way

/LET HER FUCK MEN WHILE I'M LOCKED IN CHASTITY/i;boards:biz;
/is AGP a legitimate thing/i;boards:biz;
/flower maidens of Moonlight Garden/i;boards:biz;
/but I still despise being with boys and I only like girls/i;boards:biz;

These are some nonsensical pastas that clog up LINK threads by the way, usually as a way of disrupting actual discussion

That's obviously not the whole list but you get the point.

You can see in this thread where someone is posting new breadcrumbs about LINK. Someone immediately posted a stale FUD pasta to shit the thread up. Fortunately for me, it got blocked by my filter. I think filters are quite effective if you know what to look out for.

pls stop you are hurting my feelings

fuck off, main net is in 3 weeks

Dingx3

DELET this nons3nse now

I fucking hate this shitcoin. Link ruined my life.
Fuck all of you shills. I hate your guts. I should've never fallen for it.

Attached: 1405460454877.jpg (400x386, 18K)

Mainnet is in thread weeks

You guys should try googling decentralized reputation providers. There's a fair amount of projects already working on this. Their Twitter follows consist of the same people already known to be involved with link. Reputation will be outsourced to multiple providers

Which projects do you see?
Loopring? Openbazaar? Not sure if they're actually reputation providers but they're first Google results and have interesting Twitter connections