WHY IS HE STILL NOT IMPEACHED

>When they tried to prove that he colluded with Russia
wasn't Robert Muller(a Republican) that investigated him?

Also I don't think that is how impeachment process works

I don't think you understand how non-physical warfare is won by intelligent people, especially if your opponent is naturally unintelligent and weak. The best way to exploit the opponent's weakness is through 'role-playing', so to speak - pretend to be a person that the opponents want. They want him to be a moron, racist, and fool etc.. However, every single issue has resulted in victory for Trump, which is why he's not impeached. Why? If I were Trump, I would intentionally say 'stupid' things, or 'act' like a fool to draw my opponents in. By doing so, since my opposition is unintelligent and weak, they will jump and take the bait on any issue that they can, only to make a big deal out of nothing or things that weren't true. This causes my opponent to look exponentially dumber/stupid and weak by chasing something that isn't really there. Such a strategy has proved to work for Trump every single time for the past 4 years. Pretend to make mistakes and act as a fool, only to lure the true fools in where the masses realize how retarded the opponents actually are.

The strategy is brilliant - and by the looks of your post, you fall into that opponent category that is exposed as highly unintelligent and weak. The best part is, you and that opponent category still haven't realized what Trump is doing and keep taking that bait, looking like retarded people. I'm looking forward to another 4 years of this, because by that time you and the opponent category won't exist anymore

Bernie is a based real progressive but Warren is a woman so 1/2 of the braindead democratic base (women) so she gets a pass for her self-titled "capitalist" remarks. I hope Bernie wins the primary and beats Drumpf in 2020.

>so she gets a pass for her self-titled "capitalist" remarks
I'm sure she was just playing politics. In terms of policy, she's fairly similar to Bernie. I think she was just trying to distinguish herself from him on message grounds. He's going for the populist Social Democrat while she's going for the wonky leftist, and wants Bernie to take all the flak from cretins who hate """socialism""" on reflex.

It's been proven at this point that russia interfered with the election because they wanted him elected and it was proven that members of his campaign team had contact with agents connected with the Russian government. They couldn't find any evidence that Trump himself had colluded with a foreign goernment, is all. Mueller admitted to as much while heavily avoiding any of the dem questions trying to lead him towards being in favor of impeachment.

All the while the conservatives, who Mueller wasn't really hurting that much in the grand scheme of things because he refused to rule on obstruction of which there was pretty plain evidence, did nothing the whole interview except go "'but what if hitlery did all that stuff instead??? While offering no evidence, just throwing conspiracy theories in the air because they know that half of their base is will support anything they do so long as they evoke her name because despite the fact that half of the left is pissed off at her and wants nothing to do with her anymore, she's the ultimate leftist evil clawing at america's doorstep, or something.

It was pretty apparent during mueller's testimony was that the only reason he didn't prosecute trump on obstruction was that he agreed with the belief that you can't prosecute a sitting president. Which calls to question, why did trump do all that shit like try to pressure comey into dropping the investigation if he didn't believe he was guilty? Saying nothing only to have mueller eventually come out and go "yeah we can't find any proof that's all" would've been a hard win and an embarrassment for the dems, but instead he tried to play shitty mob boss and people are left wondering why.

the elections are going to be such a fucking shitshow

As far as I remember, Trump is the biggest peacenik in the White House, and the least corrupt. I remember
> Clinton
The first US president to bomb a European city since 1945, fucked up American interventions forever with Mogadishu, gave Kosovo to the organ-trafficking mafia, bombed Baghdad for no reason, Waco, Whitewater and cattle futures...
> GW Bush
Probably the guy who started the destruction of Western civilisation. 90% of the problems we have now are due to his corruption or idiocy.
> Obama
A total psychopath, made sure the USA would be at war with more countries at the same time than ever since WW2. The bloodthirstiest US president since Truman. He got away with everything in the Clinton Foundation scandal, the dirty drone wars, Snowden, Uranium One, 500M dollars used to finance Al Qaeda ij Syria... the guy is smart, but the evil genius type of smart.

Meanwhile Trump has only attacked a Syrian base so far, and immediately saw that it was a mistake, so he pulled out afterwards and let Assad win the war. Bush or Obama would have gone balls out on Syria. He is the first US president to be serious about "America first" and to tone down interventionism. He didn't lie about protectionist economic policy. He isn't involved in any outrageous scandals beyond the fact that he fucked a pornstar, and that Epstein's """suicide""" happened under his presidency. So what's wrong if future US presidents are more like Trump and less like Bush??

record breaking amounts of drone killings and a premature pulling out that threatens to revitalize isis aside most of what trump has done is ruin things on the homefront. He's a reflection of the Obama-era conservative strategy to win at absolutely any cost.

To avoid getting into a long winding rambling listing off everything he's done because there's just that much, he's
>killed morale with divisive rhetoric
>painted american citizens as foreign others and suggested they should get out
>regularly paints any and all critics as enemies to america
>has ignored congressional proposals outright
>pulled financial support from states that oppose him for no good reason
>stacked the government with his relatives, refused to completely cede control of his corporate empire
>outright stated you can only trust him
>loudly complained about checks and balances not letting him do whatever he wants
>retweeted neo-nazis for agreeing with him
>stacked the supreme court (although this one was mitch)
>as the above says, for some reason obstructed an investigation that came outrefusing to convict him on the main charge, continues to sperg out whenever it's brought up
>tried to gaslight the american people into believing the migrant caravan was going to be some kind of roving gang raping and pillaging border towns in the lead up to the congressional elections

there's too much. it's no wonder america's second biggest geopolitical threat supported him for the presidency, he's a non-interventionist who's done little but demolish civility and call all of our democratic systems into questions on the homefront.

oh and he literally called for a revolution/to march on washington when he falsely reported that obama only won the electoral college

and then
lol

>biggest peacenik
He appointed a notorious neocon warmonger John Bolton as his national security advisor and another hawk as his secretary of State.
> and the least corrupt
The Mueller investigations alone have yielded more than 20 convictions of personnel close to Trump. It says that the only reason Trump is not outright guilty of conspiracy is because of his and his ilk's incompetence and because of staff outright refusing to carry out his illegal orders: washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/22/trump-says-nobody-disobeys-my-orders-heres-how-wrong-he-is/

What the fuck? I thought all the schizo boomers are on Jow Forums. Did they finally discover that there are other boards beside it?

>I thought all the schizo boomers are on Jow Forums
Lel look at the catalog and tell this place is not Jow Forums

YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG YANG GANG

Attached: 66803236_134726801083477_23442803660763359_n.jpg (455x455, 54K)

It's much better. There are plenty of decent threads and the place is much more balanced. There are still right-wing nuts and Trump worshippers but even they are more reasonable and are balanced out by good people.
> 3 minutes
Drop out already you fucking loser.

>every time the democrats try
"the democrats" have tried to do it exactly zero (0) times, schizo