Please explain, Germany

still no germans posting

God I’m so horny rn

what are you, deaf? they're americans

What does Brazilian flag on wall mean?

thats are FUCKING HOT!!!!

that's a brazilian jiu-jitsu school

Does not this make them a bit sexually desensitized to women ? Like they are used to rubbing their bodies against each other while repressing their sexual desire.
Gender segregation is healthier imo

Attached: reading.jpg (657x527, 40K)

I thought it's unfair for real sports. boys always win in most of those videos. They should consider the power balance between boys and girls.

bump 2

rare

I'm surprised this is still up

Germs are a menace to humanity.
They need to be exterminated.

Attached: 1527076098602.png (525x444, 369K)

He tried to grab her hair, what a cheater

Germans are literal pedophiles, and have been pedos for centuries. Daily remind, this German fag traveled to Italy in the 1800s to take nude photos of Sicilian boys.

Attached: Wilhelm_von_Gloeden_(c._1891).jpg (800x1070, 177K)

They weren't sexualized though. You can likely find them in art galleries.

>defending pedophilia
Found the german-american

I'm not defending pedophilia.

>Wilhelm von Gloeden
>traveled to Italy in the 1800s to take nude photos of Sicilian boys.

That's interesting. Thanks for the information!

>Von Gloeden was interested only in young boys and early adolescents. He photographed some of the same models for years but usually stopped doing so as they reached early manhood. A couple of young children who cannot be much
more than 5 or 6 also turn up in his photographs.

He was also a homosexual lol. Was a reason he chose the poorest region of Italy. Much youth to exploit. The German Michael Jackson. The things gay pedos could get away with back in the day.

The photographs weren't particularly sexual, and I've never heard of evidence he slept with his models.

i ain't clickin that shit nigga

Still defending pedophilia. Taking nude photos of children in suggestive poses some of which were semi erect would get you arrested today. You sick fuck.

You're suspect user.

Attached: tenor.gif (400x400, 2.95M)

That's not pedophilia, and I'm not defending pedophilia. In American law there's a bunch of factors that determine whether or not material is illegal pornography. Seeing as his work is displayed in the USA, I'm assuming it doesn't meet the criteria for illegal pornography.

I just know the limits of free speech and what constitutes pornography or exploitation rather than art.

They're not displayed in the USA, don't know what you're talking about user, and yes, that is considered child pornography here. People have gone to jail for less.

A whole bunch of his works are literally displayed on Wikipedia and the Wikimedia commons. Generally if it's displayed there it's not something illegal lol

>wikipedia
>USA
Pick one, it's a free online encylopedia, not an art gallery in the US. Even the wiki shyed away from posting some of the more questionable and younger ones.

How do you know which ones they didn't post? And isn't Wikipedia hosted in the USA?

ewwwww germany you creepy

The girl should have been wearing the same outfit. Would have definitely had a wank if that was the case.

Faggotry isn't my cup of tea but if you legitimately find a healthy attraction to young girls wrong then you should be cast out of society. There is no ethical, moral or biological justification for your bigotry.

You said
>his work is displayed in the usa
As if his work was in some sort of gallery, or celebrated openly, it is not. It benefits from being unknown. And if someone saw you with work like that in your possession you would definately be put on a list.

>It benefits from being unknown
He's pretty well-known actually. He's known particularly for his depiction of nudes.

Not enough to be in any art gallery within the US, as you were insinuating. Even the very wiki which you cite lacks in citation and detail. He would be well known amongst paedophile circles perhaps.

Wikimedia Commons has the details. Are you trolling or just retarded?

I'm talking about lack in detail, pedo. Someone who is "well known" would have much more than just a few paragraphs much of which in need of citations. The question is are you trolling or do we have to get authorities out here?

Do Americans really?

Don't leave your kids around white people confirmed.

I'm not a pedo. You're just interpreting anything you hear in such a way that you can accuse me of being a pedo.

>t.

Attached: PedoBear.jpg (800x450, 34K)

The guy's work is on the Getty museum website for crying out loud

Most people here are justifiably anti-pedophilia. However this also means that our laws can be so arbitrary that teenagers get jailed for sexting each other.

No just the pedos. But I like how he's suggesting the work being available on some website makes it not wrong LOL.

If it was illegal content, would it be available on Wikimedia Commons? Use your head for a second.

That is due to it's age. It is not covered by their policies. If someone did the same at present, it would not be up there trust. Even still, if someone saw you with that type of content and reported you over it you would most likely face penalties. Even people in posession of the so called art on forums, speak with caution and feel the need to backtrack on their every word as to not provoke too much attention because even they realize they are in possession of some iffy shit. If you had a bunch of naked children on your hard drive, the authorities will not care whether they are wanking each other or not. You're going to jail brah.

Yeah that's because people's sensibilities are more tender today. People will ardently defend things like teenagers going to jail for sexting each other because any criticism of any law regarding CP is seen as apologia for pedophilia.

>the so called art
Non-art made it into the Getty Museum? That's a first.

Ignore the retards and redditors, they get afraid of everything.

This kind of person is unfortunately common. They see pedophilia in their own shadow.

soundcloud.com/user-730203081/giannis