She WON

She WON

Attached: 0.jpg (1080x544, 334K)

Out of all the bullshit that's been going on with US politics the electoral college actually makes sense

Who cares?

Who cares? Both are the same shit, puppets of the corporations and bankers

See Article II, sections 1 through 5 of the United States Constitution. She lost.

Representitive democracy is outdated.
People forget, but one of the reasons the electoral college exists is because it was formed at a time when it could take days, if not weeks for a message to get across the country. Electors filled that roll. Now, computers have made it so that in theory, every bill proposed could be voted on by the entire country, popularly.

Attached: 3d0b7cda1cda2be23488df18cebc6d6b5731fd8c651466141f57b6ed36743d62_1-1.jpg (1080x692, 316K)

this. it prevents a small group of states that have bigger population from dictating every election.

The electoral college is a really great idea, it'd make a use much more feasible and agreeable to smaller countries.
Anyways, isn't that 2 million not even 1 percent of the total population and like 1and some cents of the voters

So? Given the current polling here, there's a chance the conservatives will win the popular vote but the liberals could still win (possibly even a majority).

It happens in Argentina.
There are 10 million peronist niggers in GBA and they always end up deciding the elections.
The fun part is that they live in African-tier conditions thanks to being ruled by peronists since 1945 but keep voting them.

Instead you get a bunch of random ‘swing states’ that are catered to and that dictate every election. Great improvement there.

Why would someone's vote count more than someone else's?

it balances the election, it makes the candidate campaign for the majority of the country's states, not for the biggest states, like our left did here but it didn't work last election

as opposed to just courting California and (((new york)))?

isn't that what election supposed to look like though
all states or provinces should have the equally distributed voting power depending on the population so there can be minimum distortion in the public opinion
i mean what's the point of having election if it's already done

Ummm wrong board, this isnt /v/

Is this Reach?

If the election was decided on direct votes from citizens, the state each citizen is from is irrelevant. Absolutely nothing fucking wrong with Californians voting majority towards one candidate over the others, the state has nothing to do with those votes.

why would people who live in the small states have to remain irrelevant?

No, because districts are sometimes created to favor one party over the other, regardless of how the population really votes. Citizens have more power in their vote depending on the state they live in, and it makes no fucking sense.

This. Why would you campaign as a republican in California when it doesn't make a difference the dems win with 51% or 100%.
And if you're a republican living in cali your vote quite literally doesn't matter.
As the other lelgian has pointed out the country is effectively ruled by the swing states.

Why should they decided the fate of the rest of the country?

are you retarded? your country is giant, there are many differences between your states and you know it

this. I thought it was bullshit till I realized coastal states would just fuck everything up thinking every law that applies in brooklyn should apply to the entire country

She ALWAYS wins, but mysoginy does not respect who gets the most votess

Attached: popular vote clinton.png (458x547, 171K)

But it wouldn't matter if each individual vote had the same power. If you vote for the losing candidate in your state, your vote basically goes into the trash. Its the reason a lot of people don't bother voting in certain states.

so that's why "IT WAS HER TUUUURN" was an argument