Well Jow Forums? and no "go back to Jow Forums" is not an argument

>That links IQ to ethnic origin, not race

Attached: you.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Mexico IQ: 88
U.S hispanic IQ 95

There's clearly some environmental factors at play

IQ is influenced by socio-economic status of the country

Based

Do blacks and whites have the same median IQ in the USA? Genuine question, cause for damn sure it's not the case where I live.

then why are some dogs smarter than other dogs?

How do we know it's not the other way around?

One shit study says it

Why do they always post the exact same chart from the same old study?

Attached: socio-economic.png (625x910, 74K)

Environmental factors.

How come blacks, which were in africa, a very rich land, never came up with any civilization although they were left alone for thousands of years?

I am fully aware that you're just fishing for (You)s, but if you want an actual answer, the first few chapters of Guns, Germs and Steel answer this exact question extremely well.

honestly i regret making this thread, because i didn't get the amount of replies i had hoped for and will get banned.

>never came up with any civilization
lmao weak bait

strawman

>The Sahara desert separating it from other continents
>Scarce amount of people (Africa had much less people than Europe for most of history despite having almost 2x the land)
>No state centralization due to the plentifulness of land and resources
>Less need for large-scale agriculture due to having the same weather all year

>africa
>a very rich land
What?

>human races
provide non arbitrary proofz for the categorization

>guns, germs and steel

Attached: 1535545527909.jpg (960x959, 197K)

name 1 black civilization

so? Tell me about black civilization

you're denying africa was rich in resources?

resources wise its pretty good, a lot of rare earth minerals.

guns, germs, and steel is the opposite of soi. it explains how successful empires are made.

youtube.com/watch?v=vLXOkZtAkPw

Mali. Literally just write "africa civilization" on Google lmao

Try actually reading it sometime bro

>EGYPTIANS WERE BLAAAAAAACK!!!

Attached: Rameses-II-Charging-Nubians-1.jpg (1135x600, 228K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_African_civilization
OH NO NO NO

remove egypt and see what's left kek

this is peak of black civilization?

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 40K)

It lacked good farming lands. 65% of it is savanna.
Except you don't need rare earth minerals to build a civilization. You need farming.

This is based on the assumption that IQ is a scientific and reliable method of measuring intelligence. It's not. Simple as.

?
You didn't mention classical though
Looks pretty cool tb qh

even that is because of muslims

that's what i got when googling african civilization like you told me to, if you dont like the results then show me examples of african civilization.

youtu.be/CvDjWw_guZU

Attached: 67542440_482057435944874_2823603011385678529_n.jpg (558x558, 40K)

>never came up with any civilization
>name 1
>actually is provided an example and finally manages to find more examples himself
>show me examples of african civilization.
mate what

>Environmental factors.

Attached: soyboy.png (276x337, 176K)

?

Arguing semantics is a logical fallacy.

Attached: ChangeMyMindONLINE_Zeze_preview.jpg (800x800, 44K)

Wipe your ass first

BTFO

>Muh malian empire

The malian empire started in fucking 1200s and yet there is nothing left of it, compare it to virtually any other civilization with ruins and infraestructure remaining that sometimes date hundreds and thousands of years before christ, yet we are supposed to believe that this kingdom was great and all they have to show is a fucking mud mosque
A FUCKING MUD MOSQUE
Meanwhile in Europe every small irrelevant shithole was massproducing gothic buildings

Attached: strasbourg-cathedral-from-above-13.jpg (3008x4011, 2.08M)

>It lacked good farming lands.
Like Egypt?

Attached: harvest.jpg (495x379, 100K)

>pic related
Damn that's beautiful