Where did it all go so wrong lads?

Your country is no better. You're all subhumans who need to be purged.

>that post
>that flag
every time

>Where
UK lost the WWII

Don't have some foreigner cock to suck, thaicuck?

He's definitely a westerner. He's also obsessed with the gulf situation. POsts all the time.

>Provoke someone
>They retribute
>"THEY ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF US"

The vile anglo brain's logic

Don't worry, Iranians are just salty af since their migrants see the light of Christ when they go west

telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/03/church-england-hold-first-service-farsi-huge-rise-converts/

>Church of England to hold first service in Farsi after a huge rise in Iranian converts

>When the British decided doing America's bidding unquestionably was a good thing (guess Brexit leaves them desperate for any kind of outside support), only to discover that none of your allies are willing to get involved in a shitstorm you instigated (not even the ally on whose behalf you did so
They were enforcing EU sanctions on Syria, you utter moron.

>and your only aircraft carrier is still in port without any aircraft.
She's being fitted out for her second set of F-35B trials, soon to be joined by her sister carrier in Portsmouth.

>Which is why the British should've just told the Americans to fuck off
Because they were EU sanctions...

Easy to spot the shitskin diaspora posting under European flags ITT

Ok, show me exactly where the EU sanctions forced the UK -which should've left the EU at the start of this year- to contralegally seize an Irani oil tanker. Because all sources I can find state that the seizure happened by request of the United States (which isn't part of the EU FYI).

EU has sanctions against Syria, you stupid Moroccan wog.

europeansanctions.com/2019/07/gibraltar-and-uk-seize-supertanker-suspected-of-carrying-oil-to-syria/

europeansanctions.com/2019/07/gibraltar-sanctions-laws-grace-1-designation/

>In March, Gibraltar enacted the Sanctions Act 2019, which provides for “automatic recognition and enforcement of UN, EU and UK sanctions”, and allows Gibraltar to make separate designations if necessary. Guidance here.

>Last week (3 July) Gibraltar adopted Sanctions Regulations 2019, which gives power to designate and detain “specified ships” if the Chief Minister has “reasonable grounds to suspect that the ship […] has been, or is likely to be, involved in a breach of the EU Regulation”. The Grace 1 was seized on 4 July on the grounds that the vessel was suspected of carrying crude oil to the Banyas Refinery in Syria, which is owned by a designated person, see post and Specified Ship Notice. Gibraltar’s government has also issued a press release stating it can now confirm that Grace 1 was “loaded to capacity” with crude oil.

This is reported everywhere. You clearly didn't look very hard.

>"""""""""""""crime""""""""""""" didn't happen yet
>If it were to happen, it would be outside of EU jurisdiction

Why do you post so many threads about the UK?

Do you not understand words?

He's a child of a Brit sexpat lmao - he's forever butthurt

Why do they even need a big navy? They don't have any oversea colonies anymore

USA completely pozzed UK and made them their bitch, pure irony

You misread my question. I asked where Britain was forced to do so. It being allowed to do so does not mean it is forced to do so, as evidenced by other EU countries choosing to not get involved. It is an independent British action from which the British could refrain and from which they should have refrained.

lmao look at this cuck

Faklands, Gulf States, Five Powers Agreement, NATO etc.

What's the point in the EU applying sanctions on countries if they won't enforce them?

Because it is legally compelled to - like any enforcement of international law.

This is entirely irrelevant to it being supposedly at the behest of a US request when the Gibraltar government made the request. Accepted it - you've admittedly didn't know these were EU sanctions and you've made yourself look stupid.

The EU sanctions are against UN resolutions in the first place.

They can economically enforce sanctions, but not militarily. Because if the EU starts dictating military policy, that means they are effectively ursurping independent countries and their foreign policy in general. The EU has zero hard power and therefore cannot force any other country to militarily do or refrain from anything.

>Because it is legally compelled to
Proofs, because even your own source contradicts you. Emphasis mine
>In March, Gibraltar enacted the Sanctions Act 2019, which provides for “automatic recognition and enforcement of UN, EU and UK sanctions”, and allows Gibraltar to make separate designations if necessary
>ALLOWS Gibraltar to make SEPARATE DESIGNATIONS IF NECESSARY

>Last week (3 July) Gibraltar adopted Sanctions Regulations 2019, which gives power to designate and detain “specified ships” if the Chief Minister has “reasonable grounds to suspect that the ship […] has been, or is likely to be, involved in a breach of the EU Regulation”.
>Which GIVES POWER to designated
>if the CHIEF MINISTER has reasonable grounds
Final decision making authority is granted to a national official, not to the EU. If the Chief Minister had decided not to get involved there would be zero action against him, precisely because the EU cannot do it. Because it is not a military organization (unlike something like NATO where refusing to come to the aid of an attacked member would be a clear breach).

Why is no one in the EU other than the UK willing to militarily enforce a European sanction? Who is going to do this when they leave?

Why would Iranians send oil to Syria through Gibraltar? are there no pipelines there?

Because this sanctions are coming from the Americans and they hurt Europe, but we have to do it otherwise they would nuke us.

nothing wrong
bongs ged dicked, as usual

>They can economically enforce sanctions
Like seizing energy supplies, like oil tankers.
>but not militarily.
Based on?
>Because if the EU starts dictating military policy
Like it does already?
>that means they are effectively ursurping independent countries
Many Brexiters would agree with you then and
>their foreign policy in general.
The has its own foreign policy.
>The EU has zero hard power and therefore cannot force any other country to militarily do or refrain from anything.
It's member states do and as we've seen they have used hard power.

>Final decision making authority is granted to a national official, not to the EU. If the Chief Minister had decided not to get involved there would be zero action against him, precisely because the EU cannot do it. Because it is not a military organization (unlike something like NATO where refusing to come to the aid of an attacked member would be a clear breach).
Ah, so you've just going to nickpick on a point nobody else was trying to make do you don't have to acknowledge that you were wrong on it coming from EU sanctions from a EU member state.

We will not push for things until China expresses interest in doing so

Attached: 1391109646004.png (599x578, 29K)

He is right, tho.

kek

I look forward to watching anglos get slaughtered during WW3.

We can only hope anglos and germans are completely eradicated in the next world chimpout.

>Please give defense companies another 100 billion pounds, you need a strong navy to defend Israel!
Did I guess the article correctly?

Hi Brits,I am here only to post that when brexit happens,please,go along with your expats back to the UK.Thanks

Military necessity has consistently been the greatest drive for scientific innovation throughout human history. Need I remind you, the internet you yourself just used to make that shitpost was invented by the US department of defense, and the machine you're using to access that internet was invented by the British navy.

WW1. Thats when it went downhill for all of us. If the Brits and French hadn't been so hellbent on waging a war of annihilation on the central powers, they wouldn't have ruined themselves so much.

I'll have you all know Britain is the second country in the world in terms of

SOFT
O
F
T

POWER
O
W
E
R

projection

Today is the 1953 coup's anniversary, should have cucked the bongs and siezed another ship tbqh

Still a few hours in the day.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/07/11/atheism-islam-rise-uk-christianity-suffers-dramatic-decline/

>EU
>military
Lol

EU isn't blockading Syria. The sanctions are against exporting/importing shit between EU and Syria, not between Syria and Iran. Bongs were following US orders not orders from EU.

See and then kill yourself.

dont they rule the sea tho ?
based iran BTFOing the eternal a*glo

Attached: 1561708131976.jpg (900x900, 70K)

They haven't BTFO anyone.

Hey man, if it works.

salty a*glo spotted

Attached: 1566028815661.webm (1664x932, 2.81M)

I'm probably the only person in this thread who bothered reading the article, there's nothing new in it about the Royal Navy or what's happening in the Gulf, it's just a US Republican whinging that Europe doesn't support the Iran sanctions.

Sinister Kike spotted

Their soft power is getting a bit soft