Did you know that Russia has floating nuclear power plants?

Seems extremely dangerous and irresponsible.

yeah and that shit fucks the marine life up

>burns all of the amazon
>he is worried for a bit of warm water

very scary considering the ones on land can't even work properly without blowing up

What happens if SOMEONE sabotages the ship and sinks it? Asking for a friend.

no but it only needs to be refueled every 20 years

Russia truly has everything! Even tigers

Are you retarded? A regular nuclear power plant is an order of magnitude more powerful and dumps its heat into a fucking river, using a sea as a heat sink does literally nothing.

>It is designed for the operation at the areas of the Extreme North and the Russian Far East. Its main task is to provide the remote industrial plants, port cities, as well as the offshore gas and oil platforms with electric energy. The FNPP is designed with the great margin of safety that exceeds all possible threats and makes nuclear reactors invincible for tsunamis and other natural disasters. In addition, the nuclear processes at the floating power unit meet all requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and do not pose any threat to the environment.
rosatom.ru/en/press-centre/news/the-world-s-only-floating-power-unit-akademik-lomonosov-takes-the-sea/

> dumps its heat into a fucking river
it cools it down first, if it just dumps it its a problem

Probably much less damage than those underwater nuke tests.

Attached: F34C73DA-40D0-4B18-8814-5C448336AF26.jpg (596x410, 84K)

>trusting russian propaganda

rawr!

Attached: f3f3082e1fa8b194f3dfb7bf2fee14fa.png (325x293, 167K)

Lomonosov has 2 70 MW reactors
Nimitz-class has 2 100 MW reactors

During heat waves nuclear plants sometimes have to limit their power in order not to heat up the rivers too much, with a sea this is not an issue. That's why you regularly find reactors next to the sea.
You clearly know nothing about the subject.

I wish I had a portative nuclear reactor

Please get away your pleb opinion from this board, the point that you quit your school at 15 is not an excuse.

It's bullshit. They will use it to power several military bases they're building in the arctic. Electrical infrastructure in that region is limited and they're planning to fill it with anti-ship, anti-submarine and anti-air weapons.

No, you do not.
One is used for supplying electricity to the power grid, another for ship propulsion.

Attached: Akademik Lomonosov2.jpg (1000x667, 145K)

Shut your trap, ignorant monkey.
>The plant is the smallest and the northernmost operating nuclear power plant in the world.[3] Plans to begin a shutdown procedure of the plant in 2019 have been announced,[4] and it will be replaced by the floating nuclear power station Akademik Lomonosov.[5]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilibino_Nuclear_Power_Plant

Attached: Bilibino_Nuclear_Power_Plant_2016-04_1.jpg (4320x3240, 3.28M)

nope, the 100 MW is just electricity, excluding propulsion and steam for catapults
the total output of one of those big boys is actually over 500 MW

>nope
>The A4W reactor is a naval reactor used by the United States Navy to propel warships and generate onboard electricity.
>to propel warships
Stop being retarded.
>the total output of one of those big boys is actually over 500 MW
>The only ships to use these nuclear reactors are the Nimitz-class supercarriers, which have two reactors rated at 550 MWth each.
>550 MWth
>th
Stop being retarded, please.
>These generate enough steam to produce approximately 100 MW of electricity, plus 140,000 shaft horsepower (104 MW) for each of the ship's four shafts – two per propulsion plant.[2]

Attached: cease your faggotry.jpg (261x189, 11K)

that's what I just said verbatim

You are confusing thermal for electric.

Attached: i said cease it.jpg (1136x842, 457K)

love the eerie, machine and aesthetic feels marine transports and such provide

You haven't seen eerie yet.

Attached: 10520 yamal (3).jpg (640x927, 141K)

based
fuck this atomic lgbt plant

It's a lie. They say it's just a "test" now.

They will just build a new powerplant in the region and move that thing north.
I know you sneaky Russians.

actual eerie would be sunken ships and abandoned or not active anymore ships, like the big aircrafts and historic cruiseships converted into hotels or fated to become scrap
or those giant oil tankers that look bigger than aircrafts
it saddens seeing them dying as metallic sea creatures, they feel so imponent

no, I'm not.
I just didn't specifically clarified energy metric in my previous statement
go vent your assburgers on someone else

>These generate enough steam to produce approximately 100 MW of electricity, plus 140,000 shaft horsepower (104 MW) for each of the ship's four shafts – two per propulsion plant.[2]
Does this meme 100 or 200MW electric in total?

Ok but for what purpose would you need a floating nuclear power plant? I mean build on on land and use cables to bring the energy where you need it

Ok retard.

Attached: 1559322770863.jpg (1080x1350, 566K)

Floating power stations are actually being considered to prevent blackouts in this shithole of a country.
knack.be/nieuws/belgie/belgie-zoekt-stroomschepen-tegen-black-out/article-normal-1382621.html?cookie_check=1566591272

It has a new bodypaint and doesn't look like a bond villain base anymore.

Attached: ECB-K6TW4AUQfjz.jpg (1620x1080, 257K)

What would a monkey like yoy know about anything anyway?

I think it's cool, Russia is really pushing forward on nuclear and that's a good thing.

Attached: 1561133171749.jpg (553x552, 151K)

That's disrespectful.

sadly big imposing surface ships are a thing of the past, even when it comes to being nothing more than a power hulk
well, that's the idea anyway

Attached: ATGU1[1].jpg (940x633, 145K)