Which separatist/independence movment do you support ?

All of them.
FREE ASTURIAS

Hong Kong 51st state alongside Greenland the 52nd state
They can separate from there former owners and join our Union

No, usa has too much influence already

>2019
>still pretending like we won’t eventually get merged into a one world state

Each ethnicity should have its own state, multhietnic nations dont work

All of them including my own country.

Attached: world_map_of_separatist_movements.png (915x400, 234K)

ok but stop hunting whales

There's neither an East Frisian nor a Cornwallian Independance movement.
The Sami and Greenlanders are aware that becoming independant is a shitty idea, because they have a lousy GDP.
Who in the world ever asked for dividing Sachalin?
The USA map is almost completely bonkers.

t.mad brit proxy

based and redpilled. truly a man of culture.

I support and encourage America's exit from the planet Earth.

I wish

I entirely support the independence of Kosovo, as I'm from northern Serbia and couldn't care less about what's going on in the former Turkish lands. Now give me those bonus points.

Réunion Island independance.

Attached: Idiots.png (843x565, 1.03M)

It would most definitly give you bonus points for your EU membership ambitions.

Only Scotland

I'm thinking this is based

Hungary worked

Kys panchito

cringe

cringe

Scotland and Palestine

Biafra.

Scotland is dead. No one speaks any of the languages, Scots, Gaelic or Norn. If you speak Scots you are seen as a poor bad person and no one will be able to understand you.

Flanders

Attached: guldensporen.jpg (638x401, 67K)

>no one will be able to understand you
If they speak English is not much better t bh

Scots

T. England

Norn is not a Scottish language.

Then neither is Gaelic or Scots.

Don't care, virgin.

I support Catalonia.

>no tibet
worthless map

all of them

What makes you come to such a daft conclusion?

Skåne. They can't speak. I don't want d*nes in my country.

Russian balkanization

Norn is a Norse language that developed in Scotland so it is Scottish.
Scottish Gaelic developed in Scotland so it is Scottish.
Scots developed in Scotland so it is Scottish.

Whales are russian spies.

youtube.com/watch?v=tLTSDx8lFfo

Ethnicities arent discrete units

As soon as someone mixes or speaks another dialect ir whatever it becomes hard to track where the ethnicity starts and ends and ultimately arbitrary

That was my main conclusion after researching global ethno-linguistix groups to try to make a map of them

Attached: 1548104453177.png (4972x2517, 326K)

Why is the east of Scotland English?

Well it used to belong to northumbria
And scots doesnt seem like a separate language to me

So you can see a case whereby lowland scots could be construed as an english people had it not been for the medieval state of scotland

Of course ethnicity is very arbitrary so this is nonsense.

It developed in the Northern Isles before they were pledged to Scotland, when Norn was still being used the isles belonged to Norway. After which followed a gradual replacement of Norn by lowland Scots. Norn is entirely unintelligible to Scots speakers and even to speakers of the modern Shetlandic/Orcadian dialect, apart from a scarce handful of words that’s been borrowed from Norn into the modern dialect.
Calling Norn “Scottish” is like calling Old Norse a protolanguage of modern day English.

Yeah but all of the East coast of Scotland has spoken Anglic languages for the past 1000-900 years so it is a bit much to say they are gaelic.
It also doesn't matter if you don't think its a language since you wont have heard it before and everyone in the middle ages called it a separate language.

The majority of members in an ethnic group can decide who is allowed in the tribe/nation and who is not

Norn is a separate language that developed in Scotland so it is Scottish, you may as well say Scottish Gaelic isn't Scottish since it is closer to Norse than Irish.

>east coast

I just based the borders on a linguistic map from the medieval times. Its based on the idea of original clay of extant languages (which i agree is a nonstarter)

>scots is a separate language
And here it is. At what stage is another language another language rather than a dialect.
I suppose a swede can understand most of norwegian and had norway not been a separate entity probably just thought of it as another dialect.

>ethnic isnt well defined
>but the majority of the not very well defined group can decide about it

Hmm
You first need a definition before you can decide who qualifies as the majority. You then need a way of applying that definition consistently.

I support this one:

Attached: dasdddddddddddddd.png (467x829, 689K)

all of them. and i think that every single individual should have a right to self determination.

Norn did not develop in Scotland, that’s what I’m telling you. If we’re talking about geography 600 years after its decline then sure, it was spoken on the furthest reaches of modern-day Scotland, but the language was developed by Norsemen who settled here and Norn gradually developed as a branch of Old Norse. Scots had no impact on Norn whatsoever as there were little to no Scottish settlers on the Northern Isles. Norn is not a Scottish language.

It is a language spoken in the territory of scotland. Hence a scottish language

"She possessed nine languages so thoroughly that each appeared to be her native tongue; five of these were the languages of peoples governed by her, English, Welsh, Cornish, Scottish, for that part of her possessions where they are still savage, and Irish. All of them are so different, that it is impossible for those who speak the one to understand any of the others. " - Venetian Diplomat about Elizabeth I

Norn was spoken in Scotland for 400 years, If that doesn't make it Scottish then when does it become Scottish?

>scottish
Was this scots or scots gaelic?

Also
As there are no universally accepted criteria for distinguishing a language from a dialect, scholars and other interested parties often disagree about the linguistic, historical and social status of Scots and particularly its relationship to English.[15] Although a number of paradigms for distinguishing between languages and dialects exist, they often render contradictory results. Broad Scots is at one end of a bipolar linguistic continuum, with Scottish Standard English at the other.[16] Scots is often regarded as one of the ancient varieties of English, but it has its own distinct dialects.[15] Alternatively, Scots is sometimes treated as a distinct Germanic language, in the way that Norwegian is closely linked to but distinct from Danish

There is no objective way of deciding. Languages can have incomprehensible dialects and near fully comprehensible sister languages

Since Gaelic was called "Erse" in Europe at that time he is talking about Scots.

I support them all except the ones in my country and in countries I like

It was a language that was spoken in the then-territory of Norway.
It’s not Scottish as the territory on which it was spoken (excluding Caithness where the Norn influence there came from settlers from the Northern Isles) belonged to the Kingdom of Norway. Afterwards it was granted to Scotland, at which point the language digressed and likely became a strange amalgam of Scots-Norn before becoming superceded entirely by Scots. A language “belonging” to a location would imply the language was developed on the location it was spoken, like Gaelic, not developed elsewhere and exported to that location through settlement, like Norn.

It was also spoken in the territory of scotland thereafter you dope.

What the hell is a "panchito"?

Gaelic was brought to Scotland from the Rhine, around 0 AD. By what your saying Scotland has no languages which is a really silly idea.

in a PERFECT world.......

Attached: this but unironically.jpg (2000x1189, 534K)

Still not as a Scottish language though.

Why not?

>Cornwallian
It's Cornish.

And, true, there isn't much of an independentist movement in Cornwall. The closest thing we have is Mebyon Kernow.

>No Berber state
>No Novgrodia
>No Guandong
>No Japan not split into 4 or 5 states (not including Ryuukyuu)
>No Tibet
>

Fuck
Königreich Sachsen should be revived

Cringe.
>t. part Scottish ancestry

t. 1/12 Scottish 11/12 maori

No Maori in me. Even if I did, it wouldn't be a negative because Winston Peters is a Scottish-Maori mix and is a noble man.

too bad about his husband...

Dalmatian and Istrian independence
youtube.com/watch?v=z-iHx5zO7rk&t=

Attached: qtOYx9c.png (2000x1333, 377K)

Attached: zastava_03.gif (533x259, 39K)

>Novorossija
>Kurdistan
Cringe

he is referring to gaelic
scots language was called inglis in scots until national romanticism changed it in the 1800s.

No. Scottis started being used around the end of the 15th century.

Palestine, Quebec, Scotland, that's it. (also support Irish reunification)

Corsica, Scotland, Kurdistan, Taiwan and Québec. I'd like Corsica to be Italian again but that's impossible right now.
I also support a United Ireland and Kosovo in Albania.

Shitalians OUT!

Attached: 1544860785230.gif (422x217, 19K)

Assolutamente basato.

The shame about all of those is none want to speak their languages.

based

Histrian peninsula, of course.

such a based flag

absolutely fucking disgusting

Celtic independence and Quebecois independence

Overseas territories of Eurocunts in other continents, f.e. French Guyana or New Caledonia.
Palestine.
Recently also the Balkanization of Germany. I wish utter destruction on Berlin and Bremen.

Celts are evil. Dauvit I should have imported Frisians into all of Scotland. Scotland would be the most powerful country then since it would only have lowlanders and norn.

none. Una grande unida.

basque would be based

Attached: lotfi_morteza20110426050431340.jpg (620x413, 158K)