Hong Kong

What does Jow Forums think about the Hong Kong protests?

Attached: 0200cd28-c65b-11e9-ad8c-27551fb90b05_1320x770_025734.jpg (1320x770, 273K)

AMATERASU

Attached: 1524019685397.jpg (425x340, 14K)

Fuck Ch*na
I await all the stupid contrarians who are gonna come here and praise China

China should just steam roll them into submission

I don't give a fuck

they are pointless

Attached: this is how I feel.png (720x827, 153K)

China? You mean Cringena?

Attached: 1564089303219.jpg (1080x810, 81K)

If they were trying to set up the Paris commune 2.0 I would support them. But sadly they are just CIA puppets so I don't care.

confused

I think the real issue here is slower economic growth and income inequality between social classes and age cohorts in HK.

The trouble that young people in HK have is not that their right of posting Winnie the Pooh memes is being infringed, it is that they face enormous academic pressure, have to compete against all of ambitious mainland for too few places in their universities, have a really hard time getting jobs, and live in extremely expensive apartments of about eight square meters on average.

HK Chinese didn't have to face the economic hardship that mainland has, and don't experience the economic growth and opportunities that the CCP keeps bringing to the mainlanders. To them, the CCP is an easy target to direct their anger against, seeing as the aforementioned real issues that HK is facing are a lot harder to find someone to blame for than finding the party that's trying to take away your free speech.

Deport all reds and cede HK to the ROC

I understand why they want freedom but also why China won't let them have it. Not having human rights is an advantage when you're trying to make a poor country rich.

动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门 8.18 PROTEST SUPPORT HKFP

fuck chinese mods

Escort HK cuties to my location

That would not solve anything, and it's not a realistic solution.

Kind of shocked really. I mean demanding universal suffrage and independence is fine. That is a reasonable desire. But on the same hand everyone is saying how the PRC is eroding Hong Kong’s rights and freedoms as to why they are acting the way they are acting, how? Can anybody give me an example of the central government making laws that have eroded Hong Kong’s freedoms and rights?

Well isn't all the protest caused by the fact chinks want extradition for HK prisoners? HK is dangerous for the CCP if they're free to criticize it

It started because the leader of Hong Kong tabled a bill that wanted extradition. It was in the process of consultations and debate. The government listened to the people and withdrew it so no rights were eroded or taken away. Not withstanding that the bill wasn’t introduced by the central government, it was Hong Kong’s leader who introduced it.

The bill hasn't been formally withdrawn yet. The fundamental issue is Carrie Lam is an idiot bootlicker and this entire thing was completely avoidable.

The bill is dead. Withdrawn or not, is just semantics and pride now. Even if it gets tabled again in an attempt to ‘secretly’ get it passed, democratic law makers will know right away and the same protests we see today will occur again. The national security bill of 2003 was never tabled again in any shape or form.

>it was Hong Kong’s leader who introduced it.

The China puppet one? It's their leader in position only, not democracy.

The British appointed someone for this position before. The PRC vets candidates for the electoral council to choose from. Note, being approved to do a job is not the same as being controlled. Politics aside, the PRC actually gave Hong Kong more choice than the British.