Why do anglos hate him and are taught he was literally Hitler...

go back to the rainy island bong

Better Island than St. Helena boney.

good comeback

also napoleon was a cunt

Berthier at Ulm :o

then tell him to go back to it, nobody want bongs tourists.

cuz they jelly

Yes, indeed, everytime a great european leader is born, he manages to fuck everything up in Russia instead of destroying Great Britain. But we've learnt the lesson now. See you next time.

we weren't taught to hate him we were taught to laugh at him

>laughing at the most successful military leader in history
do americans really do this? is that why you lost to rice farmers?

he was a manlet who got exiled multiple times by his own people and always ended up getting cucked by one of the few countries in europe americans know anything about

I don't know if you're the shitposting or not, but that's exactly how my history teacher painted him as, a laughing stock. it wasn't until after high school when I decided to look the guy up and realized that he's actually pretty fucking based, definitely one of my favorite historian figure. Fuck you Ms. Hamilton you lonely cunt.

what the fuck? your country literally wouldn't exist if not for him

Anglos are just mad that he defeated them so often

ok redpill me france

why did the French immediately accept Napoleon, who crowned himself emperor of France, just after fighting a revolution to depose and reject monarchs?

am I missing something? he seems like everything the revolution fought against. I visited les invalides last year and it was so over-the-top.

>american education

Well that's how they approach napoleon in the american public school system, i just used layman's

>he believes the revolution movement was a common motivation to bring a democratic regime
>instead of just complaining about huge misery

Napoleon? Cringe...
Robespierre? Woah truly based

Attached: Robespierre.jpg (939x1190, 609K)

>and are taught he was literally Hitler?
Same here

Anglos are in general quite ignorant and uneducated when it comes to history outside of their own
half of them probably doesn't even know what the Code Napoleon is

Have you heard of la terreur ? France was still despotic at that time, there was just a huge turnover that's all. Napoléon has been put in place by notables more than him climbing to the top alone, they thought they could use him as they pleased but he had the gall to make it alone once on top. The whole 'french like freedom' narrative is totally made up.

>Why do anglos hate him and are taught he was literally Hitler?
Anglos had an earlier access to widespread mass media than most other cultural spheres in europe, so propaganda had an earlier and deeper impact on the population than in other countries.

I wonder why British propaganda against Lincoln didn't stick

Attached: extremes-meet.jpg (400x313, 39K)

Why would we learn about nations being cucked into using French civil law when we have a perfectly viable legal system of our own?

>perfectly viable legal system

Because he hated the Jesuits who are the puppetmasters behind communism and internation jewry.

>I don't want to look at other alternatives or learn what they're about because I was told I should use this and only this
ant mentality
nobody says french civil law is better or worse but knowing the differences between and key points of both systems is important

t.lindybiege

This

Despite being a twat. He has a fucking awesome painting

He destroyed our empire, Alvaro, stop being an afrancesado faggot

Who gives a shit about wogs

based Anglo brother

Cheers England.

Attached: 1564607927177.jpg (1024x504, 41K)

I would argue the precedent set by him was pretty awful, I mean all the states that took their main inspiration from le ebin napoleonic revolution ended up being unstable

The belief that charismatic military strongmen could just assume power and force reform, irrespective of institutions was a cancerous one and it took Europe over a century and two global wars to get over, and some parts of the world like Latin America are still not over it; see the Venezuela crisis.

>Divided struggling states of China become unified through warfare and conquest
Yay for combined prosperity and peaceful allies!
>Divided struggling states of Japan become unified through warfare and conquest
Congratulations, now you're a real player on the global stage!
>Divided politically-warring states of America become unified through warfare and conquest
Finally got that big job done, and now that our prosperity is consolidated into a super-continent-country, we're a superpower ready to get involved with the world at large!
>Guy from one of Europe's greatest powers finally tries to unify Europe the only way that history has shown it can ever be done: by warfare and conquest
>Stands up and takes the burden of the mantle of "warlord/monster", like Nobunaga before him, for the greater good and necessary growing pains
NO BAD WARLORD EVIL CONQUERER WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP OUR DIVIDED WEAKNESS!
>Another guy from another of Europe's greatest powers stands up later, paints himself the monster, and tries to unify Europe again
NO BAD PURE EVIL MONSTER MURDERER WE WILL NEVER UNIFY HOW DARE YOU EVEN ATTEMPT IT! HOW COULD SOMEONE DO SOMETHING SO EVIL AS DEMONIZE THEIR OPPONENTS IN WARFARE AND ACTUALLY ATTACK THEM?
>Europe suffering greatest economic crisis of all time
>Immigration and fuckery from foreign influences/threats are eroding any individuality that keeps the divided country-states unique, because each country on its own is weak to foreign influence if not unified, so melting all European identities together wouldn't even make a difference at this point
But no, let's keep praising how important and beneficial it was for everyone else on Earth to unify while fearing and scare-mongering for any unification that would benefit ourselves. Anyone who ever attempted to unify Europe or even suggests it in the future is the literal embodiment of Satan himself, just wants to watch the world burn, and needs to be publicly tortured and executed for all to see.

From one point, he genocided his own people. From other, he only defended France from intervention.