Why isnt there a media chimpout over this??
Hmm there's something very weird going on...
Why isnt there a media chimpout over this??
Other urls found in this thread:
data.worldbank.org
twitter.com
Because the presidents of Angola and Congo didn't pledge to burn and cut down their forests as much as they could?
...
Because black people are not responsible for their miatakes. The brazilian fascist man literally said he wanted a tree genocide and wanted to burn the wife of Micron.
>Because the presidents of Angola and Congo didn't pledge to burn and cut down their forests as much as they could?
EUeueu kkkk dumb leftard brainwashed by the communist media when Bolsonaro said he was going to cut it all down to spite the libs he meant he was actually going to work his hardest to preserve it all kkkkk sopa
>what do you mean I can't burn down the forest to plant more soy???
but they can you gretin
>mmmmmmmm sopa de soy uma delicia!
>third worst
I thought the fires in Russia were also more widespread?
seethe more
>seethe more
Yeah, all this shit has gotten out of proportion.
Even if bolsonaro did, still not an argument
That's what you get electing a retard.
>we are going to burn down the forest
>forest burns down
Not an argument indeed
chad exmilitary vs virgin rothschild banker
>believing in Anglo media and even giving it any credibility at all
I hope you are not a brainlet and do that.
No Macron is not a retard, he just does what his masters told him.
dumb militaries die under the orders of their banker lords tho
that's why they tell you that populists are dangerous
>we are going to burn down the forest
No one has ever said this
Why isnt the media overreacting about the fires in Angola and Congo (which are bigger than brazil's)?
Brazil has absolutely nothing to do with them, so shit bolsonaro says doesnt matter.
>No one has ever said this
Are forest fires the new epic meme of this year to focus on while Epstein & co keep happening?
Maybe macron wants to use this as a scapegoat to get more votes since his image is shit in france.
there are no elections right now
Nah he did it to throw mercosur in the bin
>phony reservations with no indigenous people living in them
>NGOs "protecting" the amazon
>in fact they facilitate european pharmaceutic and cosmetic companies to do R&D on our soil without paying what they owe us
>billions in revenue from the products they patent using our rainforest
>first uncucked president in over two decades says "that's enough" and stops the whole scheme
>fires magically start happening
>global media uproar in unison
>calls for removing him
>calls for foreign intervention
>muh g7
>nobody talks about how the fires occur every year and this year's is nothing special
You people are pathetic, you serve greedy bankers and lobbyists and actually defend what they preach to you on the media without even questioning.
It wouldn't surprise me to see the UN or other extranational bodies calling for the amazon to become "human patrimony" or an "international region" in the near future.
>we are going to cut down the forest!
>forest starts getting cut down
But no it must be some kind of international conspiracy against macacoland
this shit has made me realise brazilians are amongst the worst posters on this board
What a strange coincidence that this crazy new international story started up just as the Epstein saga was getting in full swing and now no one even remembers that anymore
>copezillians
>666
Based moloch servant
I thought that you consider themselves white n shieet descendants of Volga Germans. You should know that only Wh*ties are responsible for crimes and destruction when blacks could do this because of their living conditions an no one will care about it.
Just check your privilege Joao Schumacher
it's an anglo thing, nobody cares here
Why bc we dont swallow mass media shit?
If you do, you shouldnt be here desu
Alfred epsteins that physicsist guy rigjt?
Brazil is becoming too powerful for the West so the mainstream media and politicians started a smearing campain in order to justify sanctions and to boost anti-Brazilians sentiment.
yeah, he shot himself in the back of the head with a shotgun then cut his own arms and legs off and put them in separate dumpsters
crazy stuff
So the main focus is not the envoronment itself, but a politician?
Thank you for elucidating
bolsocucks are so pathetic. hopefully eu cuts all trade with brazil
Why he burns forest would it make more sense to cut it down and sell it
Don't fall for anti-Brazilian propaganda. Libtards are just butthurt because Brazil elected a redpilled president.
mama merkle shot down macrons sanction plan to keep trade open lmao
The oe who invented gravity?
EU deals need the approval of all the member states
Because everyone is fine on shitting on Africa because of racism
Based.
Yes. And bigger thing even, Epstein's last voyage has been.... In PARIS !
And there was french victims. Good one user.
Reply to this post if Brazilians should be rangebanned
...
fucking shill come to our soil and i shall make you fertilizer so you can help trees and fungus grow and ACTUALLY be of any use
Steppes and bushes burning in Africa that will regenerate quickly isn't the same as a burning rain forest
nope its rain forests burning there too
>moving goal post
>strawman
>ad hominem
Like clockwork!
>same flag
>must be same poster
that dude is not the only brazillian lurking, you shoulda've realized that but you must be retarded or ill-intentioned
I have no fucking idea about Brazil so I can't judge if that's the case, but it wouldn't surprise me. They did the same shit with Italy where stuff they ignored for decades was suddenly on every front page just because the media has a massive hateboner for Salvini.
literally who gives a shit, monkeyzillians need to be shat on irregardless of what they do.
So, the problem is not the envoronment itself or >muh oxygen (lmao), but us
The wwf has-been accused of hiring mercs to kill people.
Congrats, you've just confirmed my previous post.
>moving goal post
Off topic answer.
>strawman
Implying I ever said it was the same poster.
>ad hominem
Insults.
You shills are so predictable.
I wanna see them do that to a black nation and try not to evoke racist imagery lol.
where do you think you are macaco?
oh my god how about attaching a rope to your neck and dropping, you know how to write yet nothing you write is of any importance
Rain forests in Africa! What will you say next?? That people live in it too?
I'm not attacking you.
Why do spics hate nature so much?
>BRs still butthurt about a bit of bantz
What shitty posters.
;
I knew this shit was off the moment it started.
Im not even a bolsofag btw
They aren't the ones who ruined the climate, it was Europeans who did that. Brasil has done more tree planting and conservation over the past century than the entire subcontinent of Europe has done in thousands of years.
If anything, this should be an opportunity to call out western hypocrisy and time for them to learn their place in the world.
>it's okay to destroy nature because europea s destroyed nature
Low IQ tbf
>it was Europeans who did that
it's china and india really. europeans might have a high per capita amount but there simply aren't that many of them
Ok Chang
Euros fear the Angolan Bull
looks like Europe is doing pretty well considering the population density
And? Being blessed with a giant forest biome doesn't give you the right to actively destroy it
depends on what you consider a forest
The amount of people doesn't matter. It's the amount of emissions that matters. USA has co2 emissions 20 times than Sub-Saharan Africa. That equals to 6,5 million Africans even though there are 320 million Americans. In Europe it's 10 times the amount. That of course equals about 3,2 million Africans.
China is the exeption that the amount of people correlates with the amount of emissions. Otherwise it doesn't. India doesn't do shit. Africa is even less of a problem i.e. not a problem at all even though they have a lot of people. If every country had co2 emissions like Africa, there woudn't be a problem. And on the contrary USA and EU countries pollute and have polluted very very much even though there isn't a full 1 billion people combined.
And you have to remember that the emissions accumulate on the athmosphere. Most of the cumulative emissions are by USA, Europe (EU) and China.
>see how big our forest is?
>no no we didn't grow it, we are actually cutting it down
The mind of the baboon
Because Macron was in bad papers and needed a concocted outrage so he could lash out at Brazilian Trump and take the attention away from him.
ITT
ah yes, suicide
btw just dropped that some video camera footage taken around Epstein's death has been declared "unuseable" in court.
Who saw that one coming ,right?
China is reforesting more than all the first world combined. Your own map showed this.
>The amount of people doesn't matter
it really does. india and china both have insane amounts of people, even with a lower emission/capita they still produce a fucking shitload.
though granted, I thought the US was a bit lower, I thought they were place 3, not 2. got something mixed up there.
>Your own map showed this.
wasn't my map but anyway, it's just one part of the equation. china also produces the largest amount of co2 by quite the margin
There's also the issue of overcomsumption. if everyone in Earth lived like an American, Earth could support a population of 1 billion. If everyone lived like a subsaharan African, it could support 20 billion people. With billion population nations like China increasing their consumption, the demand for everything increases, which leads countries to tap on unused lands to supply that demand, like the Amazon.
At least they compensate for it. And you? Abolishing nuclear power because green cucks said it was bad, and relying on coal power even though it pollutes way more wasn't very wise.
They also dont mention Bolivia, which also has a burning rainforest but has had the same leader forever.
Based South Hemisphere brother.
Stay strong against China there mate.
no it wasn't and if the projections for the green's voter turnout come true I am legit thinking about leaving this country because they are fucking retards who will destroy nature faster than anyone else in their stupidity
Ok faggot how about you give an actual source instead of fabricating.
source is the World Bank, written right there.
>Since 1970, over 700,000 square kilometres (270,000 sq mi) of the Amazon rainforest have been destroyed.
>Rainforests have decreased in size primarily due to deforestation.
>Despite reductions in the deforestation rate over the last ten years, the Amazon rainforest will be reduced by 40% by 2030 at the current rate.
We should genocide all Chimpzilians for the sake of your planet.
On the hands of Germany, the forest would have been gone by 1914, and today you would be playing "nice guy" for reforesting.
Let's get some things clear, the Amazon is NOT being deforested for human settlement, nor to feed the country, it's all for export crops. To feed soy to entitled firstie faggots like you. If you really want to make a difference, then lobby your government to ban German companies from having business in Brazil, which I can assure are many, they make many billions in profit, far more than any "help" you might have given us, and yes, they contribute to the deforestation too.
It's written in the pic
data.worldbank.org
>he went from full denial mode to blaming everyone else for his own actions
God I loathe Apezilians so much
>seething this much because you all destroyed your forest in the past and now "chimps" have the only one that is left.
But no, it's they that are the problem. Fucking chimps did a better job than us and now we depend on them. Suck my simian dick, pigskin.