"Everyone should act in their own rational self-interest!"

Since we all seem to be in agreement that that would be a dick move, why do you assume it would go unpunished? Where does this cognitive dissonance come from?

>it's not my interest to take stuff I don't have
Don't see how

Do you only not steal stuff because you might be thrown in jail?

If you can it is. These are the same clowns who have to resort to special pleading when it comes to child slavery as their line of logic finds it permissible if followed to its conclusion.

>Since we all seem to be in agreement
No one has made that agreement yet. Stop assuming stuff.
>why do you assume it would go unpunished?
Because the one who would do the punishing is dead.

Attached: 1557418355678.png (500x606, 271K)

Yes. Not because I am afraid of you lmao

Not the reason I don't rob grandmas but definitely the reason I don't steal from the rich.

Attached: 58-586397_png-pepe-dab-transparent-png.jpg (840x983, 189K)

Yes.

based

Rarely worth the risk

t. Leftoid

Depends on the size of your booty.

>If you can it is
No. You've completely misunderstood its meaning and are attacking a one-dimensional straw man. Do you only not murder people because you can't get away with it? Presumably it is against your personal values to do so, thus it is not in your rational self-interest to do so, even if you could. The same principle applies here.

Do you know what the word "seem" means?

>Because the one who would do the punishing is dead
Okay, so you're a psychopath. Gotcha.

>no! your argument is invalid because i called you a psychopath! in an ancap society, there wouldnt be any psychopaths!

If I'm acting in purely my self-interest and I am capable of killing you to take your things then why shouldn't I do it?

That's not why it's invalid. Of course there are going to be psychopaths and the like in any society. Thinking that their actions would go unnoticed and unpunished however is frankly ridiculous and goes to show that you're neither honest nor serious.

>Thinking that their actions would go unnoticed and unpunished however is frankly ridiculous and goes to show that you're neither honest nor serious.
Why do you assume that everyone will rush to your defence and take revenge on your behalf? Because of altruism? That's not very self-interestly tbqh

I'm sure the free market will keep gigacorps in check, amirite fellow ancaps?

>exact amount
Well you sound like a communist, fuck you and your "equal share"

Here's your strawman

Attached: image.png (500x784, 219K)

Again, you're mangling the definition and attacking a straw man. There's plenty of reasons why most people wouldn't. It being against their personal values being one of them. Another being that society generally speaking frowns upon murdering other people. It's not very different from how it is today.

Well of course since it is in their personal self interest

Okay, this is extremely stupid, because you assume that theft is always black and white. One immoral perpetrator and one moral victim.
Sure, when someone steal your wallet from your pocket most people would probably think that is immoral, but that is far from the only form of theft.

I don't murder criminals because I would be jailed for it but it's definetly in my self interest

Attached: 1288464489591.png (534x380, 262K)

hehe.. after all the freer the markets the freer the people! Libtards and commies BTFO

>gigacorps
you mean businesses that only exist due to governments taxing the shit out of their competition?

Attached: 15554982978320.png (833x430, 342K)

>Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®
Noice/10.

Attached: 1491524834630.jpg (628x1024, 61K)

Right now a lot of people aren't killing others or breaking into homes because they don't want to go to prison and get raped for 20 years.

>only exist due to governments taxing the shit out of their competition?
Without legal constraints, they'd just kill their competition.

libershit cope

THE INVISIBLE HAND WILL FIX IT