Brazil-Bolivia border. These two areas looked identical in 2006

You know that Jow Forums is not interested in good arguments and facts, right?

Brazilians are the cancer of the world.

Attached: Change in Forest Cover.jpg (5315x2531, 918K)

When the Amazon is gone 100% of your country will be a shitty Sahara desert

Bolivia looked like THAT?!

one country is a superpower, the other is a irrelevant shithole.

Iberian Peninsula is already an extension of North Africa.

>Brazilian industry

I meant Brazil when I said your country since he’s a hue diaspora

cease all trade with brazil
arrest all brazillian ambassadors at every embassy in the west

How does Bolivia defend such a large border from Brazilian woodcutters?

Boris Johnson is our ally. No hostile actions can come from Britain.

The Brazilizians' goal is not to procure wood. It's to create crop fields or grazing areas. No point doing this on the Bolivian side.

wtf stop it Indonesia

The Virgin rural índio vs The Chad BR Capitalist

om nom nom delicious empty forest

Is it official government policy?
I imagine most of OP's pic would be unlicensed woodcutting

There are many Brazilian farmers in Bolivia, though, and in Paraguay too. They're colonizing those countries and are responsible for a large part of those countries agricultural output. The other part comes from the mennonites.

yep
i regret nothing

and our industry/commerce comes from the chinese immigrants
i regret nothing

eh, they do some shitty airplanes
and my government buys them
i do regret this

Attached: images.jpg (960x640, 86K)

>and our industry/commerce comes from the chinese immigrants
The arabs went away?

Europe its green because theres no more forest left

europeans chop all their forest, now they just used to extract oil at north pole, burn coal to generate electricity, throw bauxite at the amazon river or play with radiactive bombs at atolls

this is so fucking sad

arabs pshh
neither them nor jews make 10% of total trade. even mennonites make more cash
we're still undeveloped after all

1. That's not true. About a third of this continent is covered in forests, and this percentage is growing
2. Even if this was true, it doesn't justify Brazil's detruction the Amazon rain forest

>About a third of this continent is covered in forests, and this percentage is growing
Just like the part of Brazil that isn't the Amazon. It's very easy to reforest useless abandoned land. You're boasting about something that even literal streetshitters do more efficiently than you.

Forgot image

Attached: reforestation.jpg (1550x1033, 257K)

Alexa, play despacito xD

k

Attached: file.png (663x446, 87K)

I said "part of Brazil that ISN'T the Amazon"

You're still destroying the Amazon tho

Westerners need their soy and niobium, and we need the money

The category we're in is really weird, why would anyone combine negative and positive amounts?

My map has the positive amounts only

1. More than 60% of Brazil is covered in forest, double compared to germany. We have the most preserved forest by far, even though its much harder to preserve a huge place like amazon than a microland like european forests
2. We are not destroying, we just using for farming, exactly at europe or americans did with their territory.

Wow, we cut 3500 hectare of forest that can easily be regrown in a 5,5 million hectare forest evert year!? Brazil is so evil!

No numbers, though

>dude we can regrow the jungle any time, no big deal

Attached: file.png (700x517, 619K)

Calm your tits, Adolf

>More than 60% of Brazil is covered in forest
It's 56%, it decreased by over 4% since the last time you checked lmao

Dont need to regrow. This happens automatically. The rainforest exists because of the water, not the contrary, the name its self explanatory

>the jungle will regrow automatically over the soy fields and cattle farms

it does, actually. it's a pest

Not if you keep those areas clear because you planted soy or whatever

Dont worry guys, we are sending help right now

so taking into account that, lets say, half of the 1/3 of the european preserved forest are non farming lands(like mountains). we can chop 39% before europe had any morals to criticize us

>you can't criticize us for destroying the Amazon as long as your country has a lower percentage of forest cover than Apezil
this is probably the most retarded argument I've ever heard in any discussion

you should guard O'Higgins before a jew lits it up again tho

I think 80% of the rural property localized at amazon needs to be preserved, its called reserva legal

Bruh, Chile is the Yamcha of Latin America.

>hese two areas looked identical in 2006
SOurce?

>you cant develop your farming and economy like we did because we conveniently decided that your territory specifically, not ours of course, needs to be fully preserved. Therefore remain poor to satisfy our egocentric whim
Thats the most retard, bro

>Europeans did a bad thing 1000 years ago that gives as the right to do the same thing in 2019

Attached: huso.jpg (213x236, 6K)

its not a bad thing. theres nothing wrong with that, its rational to use most of the territory for farming and preserve part of it, not everything

>oh no, you must remain poor and destitute instead of developing your country
You'd rather we mass immigrate to Europe, and call us lazy leeches for not making good use of our homeland and go live on yours.

We live in the 21st century, our economies aren't based on agriculture anymore. How about you take you soy and shove it up your fat brown ass

We just sent planes to Paraguay to put off the fires, ungrateful bitch

>our economies aren't based on agriculture anymore
explain veganism then

when?

Now

do you eat wind?

this?
radio.uchile.cl/2019/08/27/gobierno-designa-a-cuestionado-ex-intendente-jorge-ulloa-como-embajador-en-paraguay/

>Brazil wants to grow more food
>> NO YOU CAN'T! MUH FOREST!

Attached: angry soyjak.png (231x218, 9K)

>a baboon posts a map with no source or legend and calls it an argument.
Every fucking time

>Bolivia and Brazil getting into a dispute over forest to compensate for the amazon burning down.

Keks aside, new war in south america when?