Do they really?

Attached: libshits.jpg (640x930, 82K)

>these are the preaching about PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Attached: 1542026979253.png (1200x847, 101K)

me in the red

China and changing the definition of extreme poverty will do that for you.

and now india
access to markets, export led growth etc, essentially capitalism, is what makes people rich

>David Frum
This is what happens when Liberals rehabilitate Bush era Neocons, the Irony being that Neocons are the ideological descendants of trots.

Attached: 1543041761655.png (3400x2400, 457K)

trumps trade model is literally the only good thing about his politics

not even trots are bad enough to birth such a horrible ideology was neocons

>what makes people rich
Makes them not starving (debatable) and middle class at best. Very few are actually rich.

rewrite definitions to fit their narrative or talking without knowing what they are talking about?

They actually are, the origins of neoconservatism originate in the anti-Stalinist left of the 1930s. Bill Kristol's father was a Trot before he was a cold warrior in the 70s.

If you compare China to India it's obvious that socialism is what makes people rich. Capitalism is what makes you an unfuckable incel that shits in the street.

Both, but more the first than the second. It's not like their audience knows what they're talking about. Marxism is a good buzzword for bad so they use it.

Disclaimer: this is coming from someone who really dislikes Trump.

>1.90 per day
lol

Trump's foreign policy is just neoconsevatism on acid
>alliance with North Korea
>brink of war with Iran

That's the classification of extreme poverty

Well that's good news, at least Africa is doing great!

Marxism is a big of a buzzword for boomer conservatives in the same way Fascism is for Liberals and leftists.

>Be China
>Abandon economic Maoism decades ago
>Adopt capitalism under Deng and just call it socialism anyway

Not great, but better

Attached: 1557826302884.png (3400x2400, 593K)

They are still socialist. I don't see why this is so controversial. National socialism is still socialism.

>China
>socialism
Lol they started becoming rich when they abandoned socialism and globalized their economy

It doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.

Try buying land as a foreigner there if you want to know just how capitalist they are.

Hardly a number to describe yourself as getting by in even the poorest countries.
Probably has to do more with ease of transportation, technological advancement and faster global trade rather than capitalism as an ideology itself.

>National socialism
Yikes!