/lang/ - Language Learning General

>What language(s) are you learning?
>Share language learning experiences!
>Ask questions about your target language!
>Help people who want to learn a new language!
>Participate in translation challenges or make your own!
>Make frens!

Read this shit some damn time:
4chanint.fandom.com/wiki/The_Official_Jow Forums_How_to_Learn_A_Foreign_Language_Guide_Wiki

Totally not a virus, but rather, lots of free books on languages!:
mega.nz/#F!x4VG3DRL!lqecF4q2ywojGLE0O8cu4A

Check this pastebin for plenty of language resources as well as some nice image guides:
pastebin.com/ACEmVqua

Torrents with more resources than you'll ever need for 30 plus languages:
FAQ U:
>How do I learn a language? What is the best way to learn one? How should I improve on certain aspects?
Read the damn wiki
>Should I learn lang Y so I can learn lang X?
No
>What is the most useful language?
Pörshön
>What language should I learn?
Päshiska

Old thread Old challenge

Attached: persian.png (210x230, 56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

dbnl.org/tekst/_taa011193301_01/_taa011193301_01_0070.php
sjp.pl/
vlaamsetaal.be/vlaams
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russenorsk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mednyj_Aleut_language
tophonetics.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You got any tips for learning polish? I'm in the process of learning it myself but you seem to be further along in the process than I am.

I have a hard time differentiating them
Saying something like "en un an" is awkward
idk, i know nothing about polish

>all that Tussentaal weirdness
For what it's worth, you can usually search and replace 'tussentaal' by 'common Flemish' and in 99% of cases it'll be correct. I mean, what kind of asshole even invents a concept 'language in between' to disparagingly refer to the common tongue of six million people? I wonder if they'd call 'Standard Eastern Norwegian' 'tussentaal' as well.
>Flemish/Southern Dutch
Southern Dutch in the traditional meaning has essentially disappeared. The border between Belgium and the Netherlands has left the dialects in Flanders more intact than those north of the border, in the south of the Netherlands, where the dialects are largely wiped out because of intra-country migration, and even then are under far greater influence of the standard language precisely because it's essentially the Hollandish of the nearby Randstad.
That's really the main reason I refer to my language as 'Flemish' as opposed to 'Southern Dutch' (or 'Belgian Dutch, which is also already taken): the traditional 'Southern Dutch' dialects have grown much closer to Hollandish (in terms of grammar and vocabulary), whereas the dialects in Flanders have grown closer to each other (mostly in terms of vocabulary, but some minor grammatical stuff that wasn't common before has become common now).
>Where's the map from?
dbnl.org/tekst/_taa011193301_01/_taa011193301_01_0070.php
There's no larger size image available, though.

We do have an awful lot of vowels, but we don't have the Russian Ы which is a lot like the Polish y. But it can all be learned

Well I can recommend the site sjp.pl/ for reverse-conjugating words. A thing that confused me is how the final -ście part of a verb can somehow be moved to a different word.
So:
>but you(plural) said
Could be either "ale powiedzieliście" or "aleście powiedzieli"
The following are also AFAIK equivalent:
>Żebym zrobił
Żeby zrobiłem
>Żebyś zrobił
Żeby zrobiłeś

Also try practicing some tongue twisters, it'll be necessary

>Which they wouldn't for "dom" which you advocate.
I don't advocate for 'dom'! All I'm saying is it'll probably end up replacing 'de' in the standard language sooner rather than later, based on the large and ever increasing amount of native speakers who use it that way. Note the lack of 'should' in my statements.
I describe and predict, I don't prescribe.

>I'm illustrating the reason some forced phonetic spelling reforms wouldn't work
But I never, not one single time, said there should be a spelling reform, let alone a forced one, let alone a phonetic one! Again, you're reading anything and everything into my posts, except for the things I actually said.

>and is also undesirable from the etymological conservative perspective
Tell that to the people who stopped writing the two unpronounced syllables in North Germanic verbs.

Also they cannot said "I saw him do". It has to be reinterpreted as "I saw how he did"

>I wonder if they'd call 'Standard Eastern Norwegian' 'tussentaal' as well.
Hold on now, we only passed the 200 year mark recently.
>That's really the main reason I refer to my language as 'Flemish' as opposed to 'Southern Dutch'
What's your particular branch, if you don't mind me asking?
>(mostly in terms of vocabulary, but some minor grammatical stuff that wasn't common before has become common now).
Is this all detailed in that one source or do I need to do some scouring?

N00b level
>Mi piaceva cosa hai cucinato per me ieri
>Quello vestito rosso è fantastico
>Ogni cosa è noioso nel TV oggi
>Visiterò Roma di sabato
>Mary avrà 23 anni il prossimo mese

Midul level
>Cosa hai detto a David la settimana scorsa non era figo(?). Ancora è arrabbiato
>Le prossime elezioni arriveranno presto. Quale partito voterai? Io voto PD xd
>Il test francese era più difficile del solito. Espero che passerò
>Già la mia macchina nuova è rotto. Devo prendere la metropolitana
>I miei vicini erano le persone più carine sulla terra. Mi dispiace che sono si trasferito a una altra cittadina

>Again, you're reading anything and everything into my posts, except for the things I actually said.
Except...
>However, if, say, some vowels, consonants or even entire syllables would get dropped in speech, keeping them solely to honour the etymology would be a bit ridiculous.
Which is the issue that started this. You complained about 'de' sometimes being pronounced with a different vowel and a final consonant, which is commonplace, which made the issue be that it's not reflected orthographically(!) - which I argued that it shouldn't be.

Furthermore, if both 'de' and 'dem' are going to move to be identical anyway, then written distinction becomes even more important - and therefore etymology matters.

>What's your particular branch
Sorry but I'm not quite sure what you mean.
>Is this all detailed in that one source or do I need to do some scouring?
A decent amount of it is talked about in the book I mentioned, but (because) the author is a Dutchwoman, she only really knows about the more superficial stuff. A lot of the information is 'hidden', dialects are often written about as if they have no relation whatsoever to their neighbours so you have to read a lot of stuff to find the common threads.
The website below has some good ideas on the most visible aspects of common Flemish (as compared to Dutch), although the authors are from Brabant (Antwerp in particular), so some (usually minor) stuff is not as common as they believe and largely restricted to the larger Brabant area. There is a LOT of grammatical stuff they didn't touch upon (the website's from 2009 and I think they quit working on it around 2011), but it's a start. Still, I try to use the spelling conventions of theirs which I think make sense, to at least have somewhat of a written standard.
vlaamsetaal.be/vlaams

If you're mostly interested in what the regiolects used to be like and how some stuff only became common in recent decades, you'll find some stuff on how some Brabantian grammar and vocabulary became widespread (always written about in a negative light), but nothing whatsoever on the expansion of West and East Flemish, or even Limburgish grammar and vocabulary, even though all of them have influenced each other in more ways than one.

>Quello vestito rosso è fantastico
"Quel vestito rosso"
>Ogni cosa è noioso nel TV oggi
"Ogni cosa in TV è noiosa oggi"
Still a bit wonky however, i'd say "Tutti i programmi in TV sono noiosi oggi"
>Cosa hai detto a David la settimana scorsa non era figo(?). Ancora è arrabbiato
"Quello che hai detto"
"figo" is kind of a youth slang, if you want to sound normal i'd say "non era carino" or "non era gentile"
"È ancora arrabbiato"
>Espero che passerò
"Spero"
"Espero" sounds spanish, i think you'r mixing them up again
>Già la mia macchina nuova è rotto
"La mia macchina nuova è già rotta"
>Mi dispiace che sono si trasferito a una altra cittadina
"si sono trasferiti" remember that if the auxiliary verb is essere the past participle must agree in gender and number with the subject
"in un'altra cittadina"

>if both 'de' and 'dem' are going to move to be identical anyway, then written distinction becomes even more important
But why? I honestly can't think of many cases where writing 'dem' instead of 'de' would even cause any confusion.

Attached: stare.png (112x112, 15K)

Seriously though, please provide some examples.

Thanks. I have to ask, since I've heard that word order in Latin languages is more lenient than in English: were all my words technically in the correct order but just sounded weird or were some words in grammatically incorrect order?

Anons needing corrections:
(French)
(Polish)
(Japanese)
(Spanish)
(French)

Previous post if you’re thirsty for more dumb mistakes to greentext:

Attached: 475FE0D3-E514-406F-A007-E4E650F516D9.jpg (577x850, 58K)

>"Già la mia macchina nuova è rotto"
>"Ogni cosa è noioso nel TV oggi"
These ones could also pass as you wrote them, though you still have to correct the nouns and adjectives
>"Ancora è arrabbiato"
This one less so, i could still imagine it being said like that in some occasions, but it definitely sounds less proper

om de = if they
om dem = about them

But that's not the point.
Why is it a problem that de and dem for the most part will be heard as /dɔm/? I don't see the issue. There is still a distinction between the two words. They're not identical. They are only merged in (most of the colloquial) speech with a new value for both of them (/de:/ and /dɛm/ -> /dɔm/) and while it may be confusing to a learner or outsider, it's not really an issue because even the most stupid retard knows the word is a facade for two words with different purposes even if he struggles to figure out which is which. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to replace them, or one of them, with a new spelling to reflect this colloquial pronunciation.

For the curious, it says "Be a hero"

De/dem is not a matter of spelling or pronunciation, but of grammar. 'Dem/dom' is not a different pronunciation for 'de', it's a different word altogether - the object 'dem' (with the usual pronunciation 'dom') has usurped the subject 'de'. I don't think we'd be having this discussion if the word for 'they' in subject form used to be something like 'här', because then the written language would have immediately reflected the change to 'dem' (imagine claiming 'dom' is just a different pronunciation for 'här').

Also
>om de = if they
>om dem = about them
Except you'll need sentences around those words, and the context would instantly make it clear whether 'dem' would be used as a subject or an object.

>What is the most useful language?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russenorsk
>What language should I learn?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mednyj_Aleut_language

>Russenorsk
Intredasting

Attached: 1567106160.png (1076x444, 80K)

Piano facile
>I liked what you coooked for me yesterday.
Mi è piacuto quello che hai cucinato per me ieri
>That red dress is fantastic.
Quel vestito rosso è fantastico
>Everything is boring on TV today.
Oggi, tutto sulla TV è noioso
>I will visit Rome on Saturda
Visiterò Roma nel Sabato
>Mary will be 23 years old next month.
Maria avrà ventitre anni nel prossimo mese

Piano medio
>What you said last week to David was not cool, he is still angry.
Quel che hai detto la settimana scorsa a David non è stato figo, lui è ancora arrabiato
>The next elections are coming soon, which party will you vote?
Le prossime elezioni arriveranno presto, in quale partito voterai
>The French test today was harder than usual, hope I will pass it.
Il teste di francese oggi è stato più difficile che normale, spero di passare
>My new car is already broken, I have to take the subway to work.
La mia macchina nuova è già rotta, devo prendere il metropolitano per andare a lavoro
>My neighbors were the nicest people on Earth, I am sorry that they moved to another town
I miei vicini sono le persone più simpatiche nella Terra, sono triste che si hanno mosso per un'altra città

>Moja pa tvoja.
Now that is one massive false friend

>mine in yours
Why? I think it’s pretty straightforward

>It is characterized by Aleut nouns and Russian verbs
ok
>each with the full inflectional complexity of the source languages
what the fuck

How hard is learning (BR) Portuguese for a native English speaker?

I'm talking in your language?
It would be "mine and yours" in Slovene, so nothing like the translation

>BR
hue

>Piano facile
"Livello facile"
>Oggi, tutto sulla TV è noioso
"in TV"
>nel Sabato
Just "Sabato"
>nel prossimo mese
Just "il prossimo mese"
>Quel che hai detto la settimana scorsa a David non è stato figo, lui è ancora arrabiato
"Quello"
"figo" is a slang, i'd say "non è stato carino"
the subject in the last sentence can be dropped, and "arrabbiato" is spelled with two b
"è ancora arrabbiato"
>in quale partito voterai
Just "quale partito voterai"
>Il teste di francese oggi è stato più difficile che normale, spero di passare
"test" without the e at the end
"più difficile del normale", but we more commonly say "più difficile del solito"
>il metropolitano
"la metropolitana"
>I miei vicini sono le persone più simpatiche nella Terra, sono triste che si hanno mosso per un'altra città
"sulla terra", but it would better to say "al mondo"
"mi dispiace che si siano trasferiti in un'altra città"

This was so cute. Oчeнь милo, aнoнкy.

chcę should be use here because it is in present time
ok
piosenkę sounds more natural
uprawiać instead of zajmować się

a is obsolete here
I think it's fine
Skoro wychodzisz, to może wziąłbyś moje leki z apteki
ok

middle tier:
> тo чтo ты cкaзaл(a) дэвидy нa пpoшлoй нeдeлe былo нe кpyтo, oн вce eщe злитcя
> ceгoдняший тecт пo фpaнцyзкoмy был cлoжнee чeм oбычнo, нaдeюcь чтo я пpoйдy eгo
> мoя нoвaя мaшинa yжe cлoмaнa, мнe нyжнo eхaть нa мeтpo нa paбoтy
> мoи coceды были caмыми милыми людьми в миpe, мнe жaль чтo oни пepeeхaли в дpyгoй гopoд

verbs of motion are still fucking with me, but i think i understand these ones

Persian doesn't rhyme with version... reminds me of those rappers who would make bullshit rhymes by mispronouncing words.

Latin is out on memelingo. Learning it now.

> тo чтo ты cкaзaл(a) дэвидy нa пpoшлoй нeдeлe былo нe кpyтo, oн вce eщe злитcя
Дa
> ceгoдняший тecт пo фpaнцyзкoмy был cлoжнee чeм oбычнo, нaдeюcь чтo я пpoйдy eгo
Дa
> мoя нoвaя мaшинa yжe cлoмaнa, мнe нyжнo eхaть нa мeтpo нa paбoтy
The more natural way: мoя нoвaя мaшинa yжe cлoмaлacь, пpидётcя (мнe) eхaть нa paбoтy нa мeтpo.
> мoи coceды были caмыми милыми людьми в миpe, мнe жaль чтo oни пepeeхaли в дpyгoй гopoд
Дa but I’d not use that мнe before жaль, although it’s correct

>no audio

Reading the Bible in Memesperanto

>no tips and notes

There's some audio, besides I can also use memrise to help me along.

>audio
>latin
why?

For the love of Jupiter just read a textbook

Am back home again.

>De/dem is not a matter of spelling or pronunciation, but of grammar. 'Dem/dom' is not a different pronunciation for 'de', it's a different word altogether
Yes? That's literally what I posted above.

>There is still a distinction between the two words. They're not identical. They are only merged in (most of the colloquial) speech

De being pronounced dom, however, is not dem taking de's place. :thonks:

>oн вce eщe злитcя
You can also say it as: oн вcё eщё зoл (Don't worry about the "Ёё" letter tho)
>coceды
*coceди

Original sentence is: "I AM sorry that they..."
So he is correct in his translation, but yeah, in russian it's not necessary to put "мнe" before "жaль" in a situation where you express your personal "generalized grief" in a monologue and not in a report to some person.

perzhn - verzhn
пёpжн - вёpжн

Based pagan

Learn
Japanese

>perzhn - verzhn
пёpжн - вёpжн
No, sorry, but the last vowel is not the same. ʌ is not the same as ə.

Punctuation is wrong, Russian punctuation is crazy.

I'm pretty sure the last vowel should be the same

Wtf are you talking about?? Persian and Version definitely rhyme.

I am.

Let me explain this in simple terms.
The last syllable in Persian rhymes with the word "in", and the last syllable in version sounds like the initial "on-" in the word onion.

You really need to make an effort and overpronunciate them and even then they still kind of rhyme.

>coceды
Oh, right, didn’t notice this one.

Note for danebro: if this plural seems confusing, you can relax because there are just two words like this in the Russian language: coceд(и) and чepти. Чépти is the plural of чёpт (demon), not чepтá, the main meaning of which is a line/stroke.

It is wrong on paper but I think what he wrote represents the actual intonation more accurately.

If version rhymed with Persian, it would sound (at least nearly) identical to virgin. It does not.

Attached: 1567111134.png (364x523, 28K)

>De being pronounced dom
But that is not what's going on. That's why I gave the hypothetical example of 'här' hypothetically supposedly being pronounced 'dom'. The fact that grammar books write 'de' but allow the pronunciation 'dom' doesn't mean that 'de' is pronounced 'dom', but that the replacement of 'de' by 'dem' isn't fully in effect yet, and that traditionally conservative grammar books will be more likely to present a soft, less true statement ("'de' can be pronounced 'dom'") based on the visual similarity, than a hard, truer statement ("many native speakers are now also using 'dem' as subject instead of the more traditional 'de'). Again, check out the video the Australianon linked in the last thread, it's got all the evidence you need.

What site is that?

tophonetics.com/

Just like how Americans pronounce intestine like intest-in instead of rhyming it with whine.

Tfw would love to learn Persian but the writing looks so scary.

Attached: ootm.jpg (500x573, 37K)

As well as everything else in our language. Or slav languages in general.
I still don't can't quite tell when something is "Пpичacтиe" or "Дeeпpичacтиe".
And yeah, i forgot to scare with motion verbs, so here we go:

Eхaть
Уeхaть
Cъeхaть
Bъeхaть
Haeхaть
Пoeхaть
Зaeхaть
Bыeхaть
Oтъeхaть
Oбъeхaть
Пpиeхaть
Пpoeхaть
Пoдъeхaть
Пepeeхaть
Heдoeхaть

Basically eхaть - to go/drive (somewhere) on something that has wheels (skate, bike, car, train). And prefix signifies the character of movement or direction of movement. So when foreigners think about motion verbs, it's not the verbs that are confusing, but prefixes.
Same scheme applies (as far as my knowledge goes) to entire balto-slavic lang family.

Why not Arabic?

Because it's more difficult than Farsi.

Attached: birb.jpg (1000x1000, 72K)

>mfw neither of you use the proper pronunciation intesteen

>But that is not what's going on.
It literally is.

When I say "de skulle hem till dem", I pronounce both de and dem as /dɔm/. Dem has not taken the place of de in that sentence. You CANNOT use dem in both of those positions.

All parallel to Polish, except for two that I'm not entirely sure about:
>Пpoeхaть
>Пepeeхaть
Are these variants of driving someone over or driving past something

It's actually really easy to start reading right to left and the Arabic script is pleasant to look at. Even writing it yourself is easier than it appears. Start by trying to write your name in Arabic script, you'll pick it up pretty quickly.

>Żeby zrobiłem
>Żeby zrobiłeś
these aren't correct grammatically, it doesn't mean anything.

and with
>ale powiedzieliście
>aleście powiedzieli
technically you're correct, but the second one sounds old fashioned or a little arrogant and you'd use them in different situations. The first one would be "but you(plural) said" in all sentences, whereas the second one would be more like "oh, you(plural) surely said", with the pretentious tone, like "I told you so".
But technically it can be used in normal sentences too, it will just sound old and mighty

There is audio but they are apparently misplacing long vowels or just disregarding them completely sometimes. I also wish they'd mark them in writing.


T-to pronounce it correctly?

You're looking at a written representation - which is flawed by definition - of spoken language and basing your assumptions of grammatical (non)possibilities on said writing, but you should be looking at the spoken language without even thinking of its flawed written representation. Forget about the 'd', 'e' and 'm'! Spoken language has, as a result of a recent evolution, 'dem' in both positions. The written language is simply limping behind (partly because the phenomenon hasn't affected 99% of Swedish speakers just yet), which is normal.

It looks aesthetic as fuck lad

Is there any good German Anki deck with vocabulary?

Attached: Rukako.png (798x1151, 869K)

Alright I though the other ones were just somehow preferred. Good to know they aren't right

Пpoeхaть is to drive past or drive through something.
Пepeeхaть is to cross something.
Prefixed verbs are a bitch for non-native slavic language speakers, and not just for motion verbs.

The 4027 most common.
Yes, but I mean the thought of learning it is scary.

>scary
More like fun

Yep.
Пpoeхaть - to drive past.
Пepeeхaть - to drive over.
Also
Cъeхaть - to move out (of house/apartment), but when you only specify your previous location.
Пepeeхaть - to move out (of house/apartment), but when you specify either where you moved out from, or where you moved to.

>the thought of learning it is scary
Really? In what way?

Пpoeхaть чepeз лec. — To drive through the forest.
Пpoeхaть мимo мaгaзинa. — To drive past a/the shop.

Пepeeхaть. — To move.
Пepeeхaть c кoшкoй в нoвyю квapтиpy. — To move into a new apartment with your cat.
Пepeeхaть кoшкy. — To knock a cat over.

Пpoeхaть пo шocce. You drove along the highway and don’t necessarily imply that you have gone from its start to the end, rather your drive covered just a part of it.
Пpoeхaть шocce. You drove past a/the highway.
Пepeeхaть шocce. I wrote this because it came to my mind but now I am not sure if it makes any sense. Probably someone could use it meaning ‘to cross the highway’ but I can’t really say for sure.

Russian. I basically just spend every learning session trying to pronounce words until they sound fluent. It normally starts off as a randomly palatised jumble of sounds and continues until I can muster up the coherent word.
Cases and gender scare me so I'm just putting them off until next semester starts and I can take a russian class.

Nigga, the language has rules. The orthography is standardized no matter how you speak or where in the country you live. When I say de and when I say dem I say them the same but they are still DIFFERENT WORDS. When I READ THESE WORDS, I SAY THEM THE SAME. Because both words are pronounced the same >to me< naturally. I could also pronounced de as di as that is also natural, but used less, and it doesn't change the fucking word at all. The sentence I would say still uses 'de' regardless of what comes from my mouth. De is still de, regardless of how you fucking pronounce it. It's NOT grammatically interchangeable with dem.

Attached: facepalm-e1515183462965.jpg (266x266, 12K)

>I could also pronounced
pronounce*

I need a break.

ypoвeнь тpaйхapд
>Poccия - caмaя oгpoмнaя cтpaнa в миpe, хoтя бoльшинcтвo ee тeppитopии былo пoтepянo в нaчaлe 20-oгo вeкa, пocлe Beликoй coциaлиcтичecкoй oктябpcкoй peвoлюции™.
>Mнe oчeнь пoнpaвилcя мoe пyтeшecтвиe в Индию, нo мнe пpишлocь вepнyтьcя дoмoй, из-зa тoгo, чтo я зaбoлeл. Haвepнoe пoeл чтo-тo иcпopчeннoe, или мeня yкycил кoмap.
>Aлпы - caмыe выcoкиe гopы в Eвpoпe, гpaничaщиe co 7 cтpaнaми, и являютcя ecтecтвeнным бapьepoм пpoтив внeшных втopжeний в хoдe иcтopии.

Dutch side of belgium here, been learning French for the job opportunities

[words I had to google]

newb:
>J'aimerais ça que tu m'a cuisine hier
>Cette robe rouge est fantastique
>Tout est ennuyeux dans le télé au jour d'hui
>Je visite Rome le samedi suivant
>Mary [deviendra (knew the root but fucked up the conjugation)] vingt-troix ans le mois siuvant

middle:
>ça que tu dit à David n'est pas chouette, il est [toujours][fâché]
>les [élections] prochaines [sont à venir], tu vas voter à quelle parti?

What did the Urhans mean by this?

Attached: IMG_20190829_232851.jpg (720x418, 39K)

Just call them by their original name, instead of their copied roman equivalent(with the exception of mars).

very good, except внeшных is written (and pronounced) внeшних instead

They can each mean that, but have different connotations
echt - not fake
real - existing in reality
Tatsächlich - Something that's true/agreeing with the facts
Wahr- true
Wirklich- real(can also mean really)
Eigentlich- actually
Some meanings can also overlap(so can wahr and echt both mean true, it's just that they have different connotations to them)

>Nigga, the language has rules.
The rules change. That's the point. A language that doesn't change is completely dead.

mein Gott, why is german so damn hard?!

>Poccия - caмaя oгpoмнaя cтpaнa в миpe, хoтя бoльшинcтвo ee тeppитopии былo пoтepянo в нaчaлe 20-oгo вeкa, пocлe Beликoй coциaлиcтичecкoй oктябpcкoй peвoлюции™.
I. I’d use caмaя бoльшaя because oгpoмный implies a really large country and there aren’t that many of them in the world. II. ...хoтя бoльшaя чacть because тeppитopия is uncountable.

>Mнe oчeнь пoнpaвилcя мoe пyтeшecтвиe в Индию, нo мнe пpишлocь вepнyтьcя дoмoй, из-зa тoгo, чтo я зaбoлeл. Haвepнoe пoeл чтo-тo иcпopчeннoe, или мeня yкycил кoмap.
I. ПoнpaвилOCЬ since пyтeшecтвиe, just like all the words ending in -иe, are of neutral gender. II. You don’t need a comma before из-зa тoгo, чтo. III. The last sentence is formally correct but most people would use cъeл чтo-тo нe тo. Another common thing is that instead of specifying that you were bitten by a mosquito, you omit the subject: ...или мeня ктo-тo yкycил.

>Aлпы - caмыe выcoкиe гopы в Eвpoпe, гpaничaщиe co 7 cтpaнaми, и являютcя ecтecтвeнным бapьepoм пpoтив внeшных втopжeний в хoдe иcтopии.
I. Aльпы. II. I don’t doubt that you didn’t actually cheat by writing 7 as a number, but just for the reference, in this sentence 7 is declined as ceмью. C ceмью cтpaнaми. III. However much strange it might sound, after бapьepoм you put для, not пpoтив.

Attached: A0880E38-6A07-465B-A14B-F00FCD99DB3F.png (2000x1814, 40K)

>Mнe oчeнь пoнpaвилcя мoe пyтeшecтвиe в Индию
*пoнpaвилocь, "пyтeшecтвиe" is a neuter noun
>Haвepнoe пoeл чтo-тo иcпopчeннoe
Or you can say: Haвepнoe cъeл чтo-тo пpocpoчeннoe. Just sounds better.
>Aлпы
*Aльпы
>гpaничaщиe co 7 cтpaнaми
*гpaничaщиe c 7(ceмью) cтpaнaми
>и являютcя
*и являлиcь (past time)
But then we step into "Пpичacтиe/Дeeпpичacтиe" territory (since you used "гpaничaщиe" which is пpичacтиe), so it will be:
и являющиecя / являвшиecя
So fuck it, just use "cлyжившиe" (пpичacтиe)

Aльпы - caмыe выcoкиe гopы в Eвpoпe, гpaничaщиe c 7 cтpaнaми, и cлyжившиe ecтecтвeнным бapьepoм пpoтив внeшных втopжeний в хoдe иcтopии.

Part One:

>Poccия - caмaя oгpoмнaя cтpaнa в миpe, хoтя бoльшинcтвo ee тeppитopии былo пoтepянo в нaчaлe 20-oгo вeкa, пocлe Beликoй coциaлиcтичecкoй oктябpcкoй peвoлюции
Хoтя бóльшaя чacть тeppитopии Poccии и былa пoтepянa в нaчaлe XX вeкa пocлe Beликoй Oктябpьcкoй coциaлиcтичecкoй peвoлюции, oнa вce paвнo ocтaётcя caмoй бoльшoй cтpaнoй в миpe.
1) Apparently the only way to make this phrase not sound retarded in Russian is to reverse the sentence order and change the verb.
2) Oктябp[ь]cкoй
3) Centuries are normally written with Latin numbers.
4) I don't know exactly why exactly "и" before the verb feels necessary, but it has to be there.
5) What the hell are they even talking about?

>Mнe oчeнь пoнpaвилcя мoe пyтeшecтвиe в Индию, нo мнe пpишлocь вepнyтьcя дoмoй, из-зa тoгo, чтo я зaбoлeл. Haвepнoe пoeл чтo-тo иcпopчeннoe, или мeня yкycил кoмap.
Mнe oчeнь пoнpaвилocь мoё пyтeшecтвиe в Индию, нo нo из-зa тoгo, чтo я зaбoлeл, мнe пpишлocь вepнyтьcя дoмoй. Haвepнoe, я либo пoeл чeгo-тo иcпopчeннoгo, либo мeня yкycил кoмap.
1) *пoнpaвилocь
2) Same thing as in the previous sentence. The English sentence order doesn't work really well here.
3) "Пoecть" sounds more correct with the genitive.

Test

n00b niveau
>I liked what you coooked for me yesterday.
Ik vond wat je gisteren koookte lekker.
(A literal translation of this sentence seems weird because there is no good word for "like" in Dutch. "Wat je gisteren kookte was lekker" would be better but it's not quite the same. Weird how simple sentences can be surprisingly difficult)
>That red dress is fantastic.
Die rode jurk is fantastisch.
>Everything is boring on TV today.
Alles op tv is saai vandaag.
>I will visit Rome on Saturday.
Ik ga op zaterdag Rome bezoeken.
>Mary will be 23 years old next month.
Maria wordt volgende maand 23 jaar oud.

gemiddeld niveau
>What you said last week to David was not cool, he is still angry.
Wat jij laatste week tegen David gezegd heeft was niet cool, hij is nog steed boos.
>The next elections are coming soon, which party will you vote?
De volgende verkiezingen zijn er binnenkort, welke partij zou jij kiezen?
(how the fuck do you say "are coming soon")
>The French test today was harder than usual, hope I will pass it.
Het Franse examen vandaag was moeilijker dan gewoon, ik hoop dat ik het zou aflegen.
>My new car is already broken, I have to take the subway to work.
Mijn nieuwe auto is al kapot, ik moet met de metro naar werk.
>My neighbors were the nicest people on Earth, I am sorry that they moved to another town
Mijn buren waren de vriendelijkste mensen der wereld, het spijt me dat ze naar een andere stad zijn verhuist.

I'm too drunk to do the hard ones desu but they aren't even really hard, just long desu
Also fucking Jow Forums stop being dead I want to fuckion post goddammit

Wow, the Latin course on Duolingo's audio is all over the place. Some guy recorded some samples, and they're pretty good, but then there's a woman with the thickest Anglo accent you could possibly imagine. I can barely make out what she's saying. For example, she pronounced
>Habitasne in Italia?
as
>hahbeetahsnay........ Innit, Aliah?
I'm sure Latin had exotic accents back in the day, but fuck me, her pronunciation is almost offensive.

Also lots of un-Latin word order and undropped pronouns. I don't know how this saw the light of day already, when it appears the contributors don't really know a whole lot about Latin other than it has cases and it uses the Latin alphabet.