Who would win in the war over Africa?
Brazil has the mindset of the africans while Turkey got the body of the africans... tough choice
Kara Boga is HIER to the Afrikan KANGZDOMS
Turkish army is not made up of monkeys
Current forces
Brazil is better in jungle warware and have actuall combate experience in the subject, it has a larger acess posibility to the african western coast, it is also adapted into crowded urban combat by the years of drug war. We lack of modern anti-air tech with will be an big issue, but we usefull tactics what can be also adapted for savanna in air-to-land support with our tucanos
But it is made up of turks
What kind of question is this?
The world
brazil would have a easier time winning the christian africa and turkey would easily get the muslim africa. Divided that map that way, I doubt turkey would ahve that much trouble beating brazil at it since despite not stable, the arab part of africa is more stable than congo.
Hypothetical
Plus Brazil has Portuguese-speaking people already. Turkey needs some allies in Sub-Saharan Africa unless Brazil would win easily.
are you seriously dividing this by religion you retards
What, Egypt would fight on Brazil's side?
Well, I think Turkey would win in North Africa and the coast of the Red Sea, while we would win in West Africa and surely Southern Africa with the support of Angola and Mozambique.
Indeed.
Now the final condition: destroy enemy's forces on the continent or enemy's country itself.
Who would win there?
Fuck yeah
Turks are our 1# enemy because they are behind all the islamist shit and our relationship with all african countries is great
How? Turkeys offical state religion is Athiesim dumbass
Well, what if we add The African Union (EU+NATO-like power) as a third faction.
A larger contingent of Brazil's military have more experience than Turkey
In the jungle and caatinga)savana warfare you are quite correct, but this "combat" experience part is more wishful thinking of yours. The last real combat Brazil's army saw as in the WW2, tinny bits of the army and Navy have some experience in the peacekeeping missions of U.N, but that is nothing when you count the whole army. Not to mention Brazil doesn't have power to an war of attrition or invasion, even our Generals admitted that when people was asking if Brazil you launch an offensive against Venezuela. Brazilian army is a defensive, due to the lack of power and philosophy. We could win an invasion or transform in to a Vietnam and win it by political means, but in a invasion, even nore in other continent, we would have no chance. The only airship carrier we had was deactivated in 2017 and it as a museum from the cold war that keeps broken we wouldn't even me able to launch the planes near the battlefield. And super tucanos and tucanos até training planes... The deployed planes you be the skyhawks, tiger 2, that will be substituted by the new friend, and and a-1, that designed as defensive planes in the Brazilian airforce.
In a autistic decision to invade somewhere the best chance of Brazil would be in a Paratrooper attack from the HC-130 or de New, but not in operation yet, KC-390.
The Ottoman Empire let a scar in the Arab world so is that the Arab revolution joined forces with the U.K for the promise of an Arabic country in the region, Lawrence of Arabia and shit, and well the rest of the story is well known.
Idk where you guys are taking that Turkey has less combat experience in war than Brazil. lol
Turkey is one of the country poking it's big nose in middle East since forever.
They were fighting ISIS, U.S backed rebels and Kurdish liberation army in the region recently.
And scaring Greece flying with jjets over Cyprus.
i hope it's the brazilians. with all the crime and the favelas they still seem like the far more sensible option. as a people they're less barbaric and backwards than the turks, and they have contributed things to the world other than genocides.
WTF
we would nuke that shit in a blink of an eye if we had nukes
miss me with having an eternal shithole under control
other than ours, of course**
Brazil's got the numbers but Turkey's got the brains, order and experience, they were ottomans and stuff.
we master jungle warfare, not savannah warfare
we are very adapted to hot and umid, not hot and dry climates, but we could adapt fast to it, i think
faster than euros, obviously, but maybe not faster than the afro-turks, but they have less numbers so we could probably win, but the goal is even worse than our current territory so we wouldn't even try to fight over it
Turkey since they are NATO ally plus, the islamic ideology doesn't give a fuck about anything but conquering new ppl while chritianity has all the forgive your brother cuck mindset.
Turkey would probably dominate the savannahs and deserts while brazilians would get the jungles.
Turkey would also have shorter supply lines and more advanced overall tech (to my understanding).
I have no idea how politics work with either country and african nations so resistance and support from african countries would probably be the deciding factor.
The defender alaways wins in this scenario,
If Braizl is attacking, Brazil ooses.
If Turkey attacks, Turkey looses.
Win in the WWII sense as leaders officialy giving up is pretty much dead. Now you have to kill leaders and and make a puppet goverment in place.
Make no mistake, is really easy to put any country to its knees. A salvo of cruise missiles that targets the the vital points of said target (power plants, dams, oil refineries and ammo dumbs) are enough. A 2 to 3 hours mission tops (this is more than it took US to strike Iraq with 200+ missiles).
But doing the ground work is another thing entirely. Assimetrical, nation wide warfare is fucked up. Ask US.
we are the niggest compared to turks, so most africans would choose us
savannahs would be a draw, i think, as we have a hot and dry biome and we are specialized with it (caatinga), but not the same as with our jungle biome
Nationalists sure but Egyptian Islamists will flock to the Turks side and they outnumber you Copts + Secular cucks.
Isn't most of Turkey a dry steppe? I think they'd win in the savannah and north Africa.
Brazil would have the upperhand though in SE Asia where it's tropical and humid like their BRland.
we have 5 big biomes, it's just that our amazon is the biggest and the one we are most trained in
amazon = hot and very humid
pantanal = hot and humid, with lands that constantly get flooded
caatinga = very hot and dry, the brazilian savannah
mata atlantica = where most of the country lives, normal and dry climate
cerrado = hot and dry, second largest biome, with very irregular terrains
bump