If two human babies, male and female were placed on an isolated island would they naturally adopt traditional gender roles as they aged?
If two human babies...
Ryder Fisher
Other urls found in this thread:
Charles Powell
they would both rot and be eaten by magots and wild animals equally as they age. two babies alone will just fucking die.
James Baker
No. The male would rape her as he wants to. The female cannot be expected to be provided in exchange for sex, so she would had to follow and physically support the male in menial tasks to increase her chance of survival.
Lucas Ward
I didn't think of that. What if they were 6-7 yrs old? The island would have coconuts and plenty of meat sources.
Aiden Wilson
Yes. The boy will hunt for food while the women does nothing
Aaron Butler
Boy would be stronger. Hunts and physical labor. Female naturally becomes submissive without outside empowerment. So probably yes
Jason Thompson
They are kids so they can’t climb the coconut tree and they can’t make a fire and they can’t hunt you’re a retard double nigger who posts wojaks
Jordan Butler
show me your biology degrees with a phd in ethology
David Ross
The man would fuck/rape the woman and tell her what to do but they would mostly work as a team albeit with the man having absolute veto power over the woman
Gavin Mitchell
No, they would die.
Isaac Clark
show me your tail
John Lopez
i'll show my fist on your fucking face
Luis Price
You can't because you're far haha
Xavier Jackson
The man has 30% more upper body strength and has a higher tendency to become violent, he will inevitably use this force himself upon the female and assume control of the group by sheer force, this assuming that its not a faggot weakling that dies in 2 days of course.
Matthew Thomas
>Sauce?
Jaxson Anderson
Angry monky
Easton Murphy
it is not a group is it tho, it is just a couple, I don't think it is in the best interests to just rape your mate into submission
Nathaniel Rogers
>best interests
This is pure animal stuff this people cant talk therfore cant rationalize at all they will have the intelligence akin of that of an animal and will act in pure instinct. Once the dude is horny (and he will be horny) he will try to fuck and the woman is physically incapble of stoping him, you can see this very behavior in nature, evolution doesn't give a shit if its consentual or not.
Anthony Nelson
>babies on an isolated island
They'd die in like three days from dehydration you brainlet
Mason Barnes
there's water everywhere
Joshua Fisher
>This is pure animal stuff this people cant talk therfore cant rationalize
what are you on about, many animals cooperate, thinking that dumping a couple in the jungle and suddenly they turn in their worst is not the way to go
Julian Murphy
No.the woman would be more.dominated hardcore than modern trad roles
Jaxon Nelson
90% of the "traditional gender roles" are genetic and not cultural. It is in women's nature to avoid threats by letting the man deal with it. Also, granted they're both mentally healthy, one way or the other the guy is going to fuck her. If the woman is smart, she will get what she wants in return though.
Liam Collins
The babies would probably die since they can't take care of themselves
David Diaz
David Parker
Yes and they will cooperate willingly or not I'm not doubting that. I'm just stating that the male will impose himself as leader of the tribe and the female will be relegsted to a secondary postion since its a thing that humans instinctly do.
>many animals cooperate
This means nothing btw meny animals also don't cooperate you cant compare how a human acts to what how a fish acts, the only animal you can compare to a human is a chimpanzee since they have the most in commom out of all animals in tearms of how our groups are naturally arranged to act.
Dominic Carter
You can't make this shit up
Michael King
>This means nothing btw meny animals also don't cooperate you cant compare how a human acts to what how a fish acts, the only animal you can compare to a human is a chimpanzee since they have the most in commom out of all animals in tearms of how our groups are naturally arranged to act.
that's not true, the majority of the machanisms in mammals are the same, the only difference is how they are tunned
Leo Johnson
>the only difference is how they are tunned
And thats exactly my point the way that humans are tunned is only comparable chimps due to the gigant diparities that exsist between on, per example, how a grup of lions behave in comparison to what a group of bison do. I dont know if you know this but humans are indeed a very special and unique race in tearms of everything, we do things like wars that almost no animals do but we do also arrange ourselfs in quite a "primitive way" such as animals do, we do have "alfa male" type people otherwise we wouldnt have kings and queens, presidents or Chad Thundercock.
Angel Ward
Probably this.
Colton Wilson
He meant drinkable water!
Holy shit, American education is truly a meme.
Nolan Smith
Their roles would correspond very strictly to their biology and environment, having no social development except that which they create in their life. So, moreorless yes. It would be different because there's only two though, they can't optimise into their roles without having a robust society as it's a matter of survival. The main difference between men and women is men's agency and decisiveness. Men are more aggressive and violent because they are more decisive and driven, and they have the strength and intelligence to back it.
Jason Scott
Both would die of dehydration.
Carter Peterson
Why rape? What if she wants it too?
Adrian Lewis
They are babies, they literally cannot do anything on their own whether they are male or female
Easton Green
Would depend on the psychologies of the children if they even lived and even if they did live, they would have psychological trauma.