How will historians describe them?

>TFW no Islamic State flag

>no sponsors
Erdogan bought oil from them.

>because all the Islamic shitholes ranging from Saudi-Arabia to Turkey support them

Is that why they were a part of the coalition against ISIS and actually paid for the US campaign both in the air and on the ground? Is that why KSA is the largest funder to the YPG?

Why are mentally ill people so common here? There is not one single credible geopolitical commentator that has ever come to the conclusion that ISIL was funded by the countries it is destabilising and yet the prevalent schizo conspiracy theorist opinion is that ISIL has been funded by: Assad, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, KSA, UAE, Qatar, Egypt, etc.

Where do these internet schizos formulate their retarded opinions from? Meth addiction?

>an actual army with supposedly no sponsors

Attached: image(5).jpg (300x169, 29K)

Because it was the CIA that organized the whole thing.

>no sponsors

Attached: frog lauch.png (398x376, 274K)

They really don't need sponsors. Not saying they don't have any, but it isn't unreasonable to say they are (were) well off in terms of finances.

Surprisingly organised for being renowned as actual spastics.

Attached: ISIS-infograph.jpg (957x606, 105K)

Because Bashar al kalb the dog of Tehran and Kremlin got them

Jersey!

>funded by the countries it is destabilising
Funded by the countries themselves? No, but rich Saudis and Qataris were certainly supporting it.