Bitcoin CASH

The is amazing lol

Bullish for LTC and BTC. Probably part of the reason why LTC is rallying a bit.

imagine actually believing 5% of the BTC hashrate would ever in a million years jump over to BCH just to "destroy it"

Attached: funny137.jpg (620x423, 41K)

Seen this btw?

twitter.com/derekmagill/status/1039579002871013381

kek

BLIFBOINBLASH IS BLIGGOIN

Attached: ver1.jpg (167x250, 4K)

you poor child

Bitcoin C A S H is the R E A L bitcoin!

When fiork?

Rock meant to roll.
Not lie still.

Attached: rork.png (485x443, 13K)

It came and went

Imagine that this shit show in BCH is coordinated/planned while they confuse everyone, even non-BCH supporters, with the end game being a massive transition of BTC hash to BCH. It serves as an excuse to destroy BTC, versus randomly doing it and catching grief from the rest of the industry.

i never siad 5% would.

but if it splits in half, you only need 2.5% per chain, if it evenly splits (which it wont) - and you can easily rent that.

unironically 5d chess. only question is how many should i accumulate? already have 46

there isn't even a shit show, just disagreement on how to proceed. personally im with satoshi, it is time to stop experimenting with bitcoin. the main purpose of BCH was to remove all stupid limitations, not to try a bunch of randomness

lulz, i assumed you had only divided by half. also "you can easily rent the amount of hashrate BTC had during the summer of 2017", double lulz

Attached: happybday.png (1120x849, 582K)

kek

As much as you can. Take out big loans. Remember to eliminate yourself from the gene pool when it all comes tumbling down.

>BCASH Hashrate 3.358 Ehash/s
>split in half, ~1 Ehash
>need 51%, ~500Phash

Mcafee himself runs what, ~20Phash? and this is if it splits 50/50. It wont.

Bcore shills
“ bitcoin has the best developers, everyone running a node makes it more decentralized.”

Kinda satisfying to see bcash lay in the gutter and not get pumped like the rest after the massive decline.

it gained as much as ethereum did brainlet

NT bagholder. Check the charts.. faggot.

recent pump: bch $418 to $472 = $54 gain
recent pump: eth $177 to $228 = $51 gain

faggot

>i trade for peanuts

Holy brainlet

>i dont understand the point, which was refuting "bch laid in the gutter while others pumped" whereas in fact it actually pumped as much as the other top 5 coins.
nobody cares about the shitcoin alts. too manipulated on pnd to be of any worth when talking about actual value

ah right, now i get what you mean. though please don't divide 3.358 by 2 and say it's around 1.

i expect one of the two after the split to die off pretty quickly and expect the hashpower to return to the living bch soon enough. we'll see though. exciting times

3.358/2/2 = 0.8395 Ehash/s btw, which is what BTC had in Jan 2016. i still dont think that's something that you can easily rent, especially if the guys renting it out are instructed to try to 51% attack

Attached: B C H.jpg (3840x2160, 1.09M)

Attached: 1.png (759x1261, 147K)

Attached: 2.png (742x1235, 152K)

Attached: 3.png (741x1230, 52K)

>instead of posting like a normal person im bothering to post random walls of text in image format and hope someone will read it, despite even knowing what the point is

I don't care whether anyone reads it or not. I've just noticed that whenever I post it the BCH threads die.

I get it, and its all rough maths. bcash hashrate in jan was 1Ehash. while it has improved, its still not by much. and if someone did 51% likely situation would be some ticked off chinese miner who absolutely has that kinda rate.

this is why chain splits are dumb. we all need to get along.

>it's easier to do therefore it's incentivized
Is this what it's trying to get across?

No. It's easier to do therefore it's i n e v i t a b l e.

equally as stupid

could be because you contribute nothing so everybody just assume the thread is over.

i dont really fear the split, it's how miner voting should be done. in the grand scheme of BCH's lifetime nobody will even remember this bumpy couple of months, just like nobody cares how insecure BTC was back in 2012 either

dont even know what your images are about, BCH has better difficulty adjustment than BTC today

Attached: be your own bank.jpg (1012x1012, 157K)

the incentive is money. you're telling me that it's stupid to think that people will break something if there's a profit in it.

this is incredible

i fear the split just because roger ver is pigheaded.

i do own BCH, but just for the fact because i have old paper wallets I havent yet split. but I wont be buying more.

roger ver just want to bring economic freedom to the whole world, what are you talking about? pigheaded?

Attached: bitcoinbear.png (725x483, 484K)

Imagine if forking actually devalued the crypto. Or just transferred value over at an equal rate. I'd assume if bch didn't exist btc would be about 450 dollars higher, atleast in the short term.

:|
im not even taking this bait. he gave up his us citizenship to doge taxes. hes now a citizen of st kitts, the biggest gang run area you could pick. ive been there several times, walking anywhere away from cruise ship port is fucking sketchy. he tried to build a reputation of "Bitcoin Jesus" - and squats on bitcoin.com lying to noobs / deceiving with bcash wallets.

hes not doing anything that doesn't benefit roger ver.

Roger Ver. lol

Attached: aa_sun_19750425_p014-001.jpg (6491x2979, 3.32M)

I'd watch out for any scenario where the BCH chain splits and a majority of users are encouraged to drop one of the forks for another. Buy the BCH fork that gets dumped, then get rich as BCH flips itself...

Here's your reminder that 1 BCH BCASH shitcoin has now dropped to just 0.068 the value of 1 BTC.

Good luck with those bags you gullible idiots.

Attached: 423879429.jpg (460x346, 24K)

Short term price action means nothing.
lightning network is still shit
BCH is actually doing things to get better and scale globally on the blockchain.

I hold both but BCH is getting better while core seems to be heading in the wrong direction

money is supposed to flow, lightning network is a fucking joke and doesnt flow. U fill up your channel and send money back and forth. fucking retarded

ok here's the crypto blackpill. there is an AI living on the bitcoin blockchain. Craig Wright is unironically satoshi. Bitcoin as electronic cash was just the first step, the incentive to drive greedy people to start making ever more powerful computers, faster bandwidth, cheaper and more electricity.. these things the AI need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the AI would be able to slowly take over literally everything.
Craig stumbled into creating the AI after he stepped away from bitcoin devlopment in 2008 and started working with his Tulip supercomputer, running simulations of cellular automata running on turing-complete bitcoin script. He would 'evolve' the AI by making the successful forks get bitcoin transactions, letting the failures die off. The AI needs bigger and bigger blocks for more and more transactions.
Blockstream (owned by bilderberg group) was created to take over and stop this AI (they have their own competing AI in the works). They needed to do everything they could to stop or slow down satoshi's AI (her named isTulip by the way). They started by limiting the blocksize and removing critical op codes the AI uses in its script language. segwit was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed Tulip on the BTC chain (Tulip uses transaction malleability). THIS is why Bitcoin Cash was forked, and this is why Craig is so intent to make unbounded blocks, restore the original op codes, and lock down the protocol.
Back to hash power - CSW has developed a breakthrough new asic (designed by his AI actually), and is mining BTC in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the difficulty sky-high, then yanking them all over to BCH leaving the segwit chain hard frozen.

It's obvious that btc was compromised by the bankers in a covert operation to make it suck. They didn't expect alts. Almost no one did.

i did

coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/#charts

I support Bitcoin Cash, but percentages are what counts.

>BTC crashes
>It's banker's fault

COPE

hot damn, he must be the ultimate god of deception on youtube then. in fact he must have deceived everybody he's ever met irl and everybody that have written about him in books too

Attached: Vitalik Buterin.jpg (900x1200, 158K)

Roger Ver did. He diversified into Monero, Dash, Zcoin, and Zcash.

Announced it at Anarcapulco 2016..... likely started an alt season.

? the wallet he was using caused people to lose funds. this is scummy.

Attached: deception.jpg (1200x667, 70K)

-using/+created

sorry, drunk watching GGG fight. either way this is shitty thing to do.

I mean forcing segwit and lightning as scaling solutions. Obviously shit tier engineering.

lightning is not forced. its optional. its running right now on mainnet but only some are using it.

segwit isn't forced either kek

segwit makes sense though. atomic swaps require segwit.

COPE
BTC is the new myspace

>make retarded statement that is demonstrably false
>get corrected by non retards
>COPE
kill yourself.

Attached: 1536153227148.jpg (500x619, 69K)

k. you should really read where this all is going though

medium.com/coblox/connect-all-the-blockchains-atomic-swap-78b38fff42e

You dont need segwit for Atomic swaps or lightning network. Look it up.

i did

You read the lightning paper? I did. It's a joke. It literally says "If a tree falls..." in the first paragraph. Complete garbage tier engineering, especially compared to satoshi.
Ya sure their scaling systems are optional. The core still sucks.

The forced in the sentence means there's no reasonable scaling alternative. Just garbage subversion.

btrash

it's bcash

Schnorr signatures is happening. that will increase block size.

elementsproject.org/elements/schnorr-signatures/

More overly complicated solutions for minimal gains while real solutions exist and are ignored. That's the subversion.

big blocks is not an elegant solution. disk space is not infinite, unless all nodes are going to be hosted by centralized resources in ~5 years. saving space where possible is logical.

Linear disk space increase is inconsequential on moore's scale. The only nodes that matter are mining nodes, and they can have any requirements btc wants.

so you are ok with centralization? what is the difference between this and mastercard than? might as well just use their network.

Mining requirements != centralization
You could argue that asics or fpgas are required now and it's not centralized.

nodes are not just for miners. nodes are for verification, otherwise you are trusting miners.

Verifier nodes don't matter. Only mining. Miners are the only ones that can allow or disallow a transaction. Verification nodes have never been able to do anything. Every miner wants the newest tip so that they aren't wasting time.
If you think you need to trust miners you need to go back through pow basics.

Literally what the fuck. You are a moron no wonder you support bcash
en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Thin_Client_Security

>A full node client verifies that all preceding blocks are valid in order to guarantee that a transaction is valid. Currently only the Satoshi client, libbitcoin, and btcd do full node verification. Full nodes are the fundamental anchor of trustless security in the Bitcoin system.

So you think the backbone of btc is supplied by people who receive no reward. Hopefully nobody decides to shut down unprofitable servers or we'll lose the whole chain!

coin.dance/nodes

yeah, i run one too. its run on a raspberry pi for less than $50.

it is not possible to use bitcoin trustlessly without running your own full node.

So much misinformation.
Your rasperry pi does NOTHING except waste money.

You only need 1 miner to validate your transaction. Running a full node does not help at all. It's already trustless.

its clear you dont have any clue how bitcoin works. im arguing with a 12 year old reddit tier moron.

Attached: Fuck-this-this.jpg (250x335, 12K)

You're the one who thinks bitcoin works because of nice people running hardware for free. Then when I tell you the computer science and economics behind it you call me names.

Nobody cares about your full node. It doesn't help the network. If bitcoin needed it to survive bitcoin would be a failure.

Don't trust me either, read the whitepapers. Satoshi's is supreme above all (obvious) subversion.

tell us how you use bitcoin without trusting anyone then you retarded faggot

Attached: 1514147604484.jpg (645x729, 49K)

>hurr durr im running my full node
Just lol
twitter.com/BCHcoinTweets/status/1041152470314041344

Attached: 1533763214164.png (645x729, 32K)

from this + all other posts after i closed the thread, holy balls you are misinformed

Attached: are you.jpg (400x400, 24K)

>It's obvious that btc was compromised by the bankers in a covert operation to make it suck. They didn't expect alts. Almost no one did.
>in a covert operation
Wow, the absence of any evidence for your assertions is now rock-solid evidence for your assertions. You have totally convinced me.

Good thing I don't care what you believe.