Canada is in the European Union. We are European

This would be based

this country is supposedly freer than the US

Attached: 1567562342179.jpg (279x245, 13K)

Only thing more cringe than EU would be Canada

Uh sweetie are you in Eurovision? No. Australia is in the European Union.

Attached: Australia EU.jpg (288x175, 11K)

t. pierre ᑎᑎᑦ ᓄᑕᐅᓐᑦᑐᖏᕋᐅᓰᑦ

>europaike enose
Wtf

EU is shit ruling over successful states

american opinions about the eu can safely be discarded.

So should a g*rms

This

but not Canadians?

>We are European
No

yes canadians are in north america but you know what I mean. canadians dont see europe as a rival power and thus have no unreasonable hatred for it born from domestic political propaganda.

Germany hates the US despite Anglo/American intervention preventing France from breaking it up after WWI and the Soviet Union after WWII.

>You are an American dependent
You too shortly

we were broken up after both wars faggot.

>another cringe desert ami larping about le Anglo brotherhood
you are a new worlder subhuman and will never be European (cultured and respected)

Silence! you spastik

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.png (1200x1421, 304K)

America could have taken over Canada at any point and any time since the civil revolutions, they're just not spastic barbarians like you Germans

oh no no no no
Ahahahhaha

Ready to be the 51st state of your former colony?

Attached: 1500106823576s.jpg (250x168, 6K)

Yes and George Clemenceau wanted to completely destroy Germany, which he was prevented from doing so by the UK/US.

rich coming from the spastic nation that had to try to take over every undeveloped nation on the planet and whose other spastic antics can currently be observed for years already as they try to leave the eu.
who the fuck asked you anyway. the statement that americans are biased towards the eu in a negative way is clearly true. nobody asked for their lap dogs opinion.

>cultured and respected
Europe's relevance falls every decade. The European Union is the last coping mechanism of Europeans in order to maintain some resemblance of influence in the world. The new world is in the Asia-Pacific, and Europe is going to be left behind.

thanks for the fresh take zhang

Just laying out the harsh geo-political reality for Europe Osman. Deal with it.

>tp
>tf

Attached: 1541716745109.jpg (540x307, 58K)

China is an authoritarian power seeking to change the global status quo. I don't support them. Doesn't change the global reality though, particuarly with regards to Europe.

How is the global relevance of Europe going to improve by acting as 28 (27) separate countries instead of a more unified bloc?

>the new world is in asia pacific.

cope. nothng could be further from the truth. judging by population and coastal areas the new centre of global trade will be the indian ocean. africa and india are close with gigantic populations, the suez canal gives access to europe and the middle east plenty of ressources.

I didn't say it would Mario. Read my post again before being retarded.

You seem to imply that the "last coping mechanism" isn't working well

Attached: 1566465847528.png (707x711, 136K)

The Asia Pacific consistently has the highest economic growth rates, with their only dependence being oil from the gulf. This will only increase with the Belt and Road Initiative. Europe's declining economic and population growth means it's irrelevance is both inevitable and unavoidable.

My post was regarding the inevitable decline Mario. You clearly still havn't read my post. Read it again.

Percentages are changing but the pie is getting bigger. Europe will remain one of the most important global markets for centuries

It will remain an important market, but nowhere near the importance that it had last century or even this century. Hence it's geopolitical power and leverage will be sharply diminished.

what

What does a piece of shit cunt sub-human German even get to speak about the USA anyway?

You niggers were producing ladas in the East while the USA gave you BMW, Audi, VW, Porsche and Mercedes.

Say thank you and shut your faggot European unwashed smelly mouth

>It will remain an important market, but nowhere near the importance that it had last century or even this century
We are going towards a multipolar world. This is not a bad thing
>Hence it's geopolitical power and leverage will be sharply diminished
Nope, it will get bigger as the integration process continues. Today's Europe geopolitical influence is only mostly limited to soft power

china isnt growing in terms of population either. the growth of china is limited once they hit western levels of gdp per capita. the largest potential for the future is in india and africa once china peaks. aside from china there is little note worthy in the pacific area aside frome indonesia.
there are not that many nations capable of potentially being super powers. yes the future will be much more multipolar. but europe can easily maintain to be one of those. china is of course one of those powers. so is india and the usa. but also the eu. indonesia potentially too but on a lesser scale. africa is very fractured but some of the larger more populous countries can easily become significant secondary powers, or great powers wich depends on us seeing similar common interest blocks like the eu and on population growth.
but as the eu europe guarantees itself a spot on the big boy table so to say. unlike australia for example.

Canada just opened an accession procedure to join the EU. Don't you watch the news?

>What does a piece of shit cunt sub-human German even get to speak about the USA anyway?
>You niggers were producing ladas in the East while the USA gave you BMW, Audi, VW, Porsche and Mercedes.
>Say thank you and shut your faggot European unwashed smelly mouth

Attached: KwOuU7p.jpg (2013x2195, 251K)

I just woke up Luigi, ok?

>We are going towards a multipolar world. This is not a bad thing
It is for so called European liberal values. Since the 18th century the world has been largely carved up and adjudicated by European power and influence. This is no longer the case, and in the future their influence will be even further reduced.
>Nope, it will get bigger as the integration process continues. Today's Europe geopolitical influence is only mostly limited to soft power
Nope. This would only occur if European powers increase their military spending, something which is politically unrealistic in most European states. And even if they did, they would be outmatched by the Asia Pacific because of Europe's declining relative population and comparative economic growth.

Sure, it's possible that countries like China and India overtake Europe. But no one can predict the future. In the 60's they said that Japan will eventually overtake the US which never happened, it might as well be the same with India and China.

This all exactly coincides with my overall argument; Europe's increasingly irrelevance. Powers such as India, China, Indonesia and other Asian states with high levels of economic growth such as Vietnam and the Philippines all contribute in transferring the region of trade increasingly from West to East (it already has switched, but it will be futher exacerbated in the years and decades to come). So as these powers rise, relatively others must fall. These are the European powers, whose long term viability is under serious scrutiny.

>It is for so called European liberal values. Since the 18th century the world has been largely carved up and adjudicated by European power and influence. This is no longer the case, and in the future their influence will be even further reduced.
European empires started to decline with WWI, it's hardly new stuff. We weren't even united back then
>Nope. This would only occur if European powers increase their military spending, something which is politically unrealistic in most European states
Combined EU military is pretty high. A rationalization in the budget would allow for higher efficacy without the need for huge investments
>And even if they did, they would be outmatched by the Asia Pacific because of Europe's declining relative population and comparative economic growth
Following your reasoning the future will be Africa then, not China

It's not possible, it's inevitable. China and India have far higher populations than Japan. First China and India were overtaking individual European countries. With their ongoing economic growth and increasing investment, their rise will have large impacts on the global geo-political environment.

>European empires started to decline with WWI, it's hardly new stuff. We weren't even united back then
I'm glad we agree.
>Combined EU military is pretty high. A rationalization in the budget would allow for higher efficacy without the need for huge investments
Not really. The in the NATO era the European states have been more or less united in regards to foreign policy. Yet their military supremacy has still suffered greatly.
>Following your reasoning the future will be Africa then, not China
To an extent. This is why China is focusing so much on investing in Africa and is essentially snatching it from under the US/Europe's noses. Only France has any influence there, and even they will struggle to match the level of China's economic investment.

>suddenly everyone wants to be in the European Union
What happened? I thought everyone hated us?

*enosi
ει, ι, υ, η are pronounced like "ι" new fag.
Δεν είναι "Η Κανάδα";

european nations already have little to say. postwar and before the eu we are secondary powers in a world dominated by one superpower.
in the future we are one major power in a world of multiple major powers. sure we wont go back to the status of more than a century ago with most of the world undeveloped backwaters and only europe and north america civilised. but compared to now or especially a few decades ago european relevance isnt going to fall if the eu centralizes further.

Further EU centralisation would only be done under the purpose that there would be a more unified foreign policy and military. Even in the most generous projections where this can somehow happen (despite their still existing some divisions internally within the EU, such as on Russia) then its influence will still decline due to demographics and economic factors.

Yes euros please buy Canadian oil fuck Russia

>Not really. The in the NATO era the European states have been more or less united in regards to foreign policy. Yet their military supremacy has still suffered greatly.
Lol. NATO is basically US + friend. Capabilities have shrunken for obvious reason. Now that the US is becoming increasingly isolationistic they will grow again
>This is why China is focusing so much on investing in Africa and is essentially snatching it from under the US/Europe's noses. Only France has any influence there, and even they will struggle to match the level of China's economic investment.
The EU imports from developing countries more than the USA, Canada, Japan and China combined, and Europe is the main trade partner of most of Africa

Bro you were commie faggots ruled by Stalin's Stasi. Meanwhile the USA gave you EVERYTHING you spoiled little european fagget. Shut your autistic mouth and say thank you

Attached: 240_F_509463_hAuvwblmRbGu4JSddIx7M1OBLVfBCr.jpg (360x240, 48K)

What kind of fucking disease infected diarrhea tier neighbours have you been? Shut your mouth when talking about USA/Canada

Only Austria, Ireland, Finland and Sweden are in the EU but not NATO; hardly military superpowers. The one's in NATO but not the EU are the US, Canada, Turkey and soon to be the UK. There is clearly much more influence there than the other way around.
>The EU imports from developing countries more than the USA, Canada, Japan and China combined, and Europe is the main trade partner of most of Africa
Sure, but this whole point is focused on trends and projections into the future. These show that Europe's influence in developing countries is declining in favour of rising powers in the East.

>Only Austria, Ireland, Finland and Sweden are in the EU but not NATO; hardly military superpowers
All of those countries have no need for a big military. No military bases abroad, small sizes, no real enemies. Finland has a comparatively big army to defend against Russia but that's it
>There is clearly much more influence there than the other way around.
Nobody argued that. The US alone are basically NATO
>Sure, but this whole point is focused on trends and projections into the future. These show that Europe's influence in developing countries is declining in favour of rising powers in the East.
Basically all developed countries are "declining". It's only natural as the third world with its big population and resources develops. What was unnatural is that the rest of the world was so poor and irrelevant given all of that
But that's mostly the pie getting bigger

foreign policy and military are precicely what increases influence in the world the most. economically europe is already a global superpower. the individual nations will loose influence heavily but the eu will increase in importance as the world reorientates itself from a monopolar to a multipolar world. nations close to europe will logically fall under european influence due to economic ties and common security interests. the near east, levant and north africa will be much more dominated by europe in the future. india will have a lot of influence in the middle east. fighting over influence in indochina with you guessed it china.
unless a strong african power arises africa will be mainly split in influence between secondary african powers, china and europe.
I believe the usa will gradually pull back their influence to the americas over time.

>All of those countries have no need for a big military. No military bases abroad, small sizes, no real enemies. Finland has a comparatively big army to defend against Russia but that's it
Yet the whole argument is about military influence. Would the EU supposedly "re-arm" in the face of US isolationism? We're not going to see the US any more anti-Europe than it is right now, and yet there has been no main military rearmamants within NATO.
>Basically all developed countries are "declining". It's only natural as the third world with its big population and resources develops. What was unnatural is that the rest of the world was so poor and irrelevant given all of that
But that's mostly the pie getting bigger
Exactly. But the pie getting bigger isn't relevant. All that matter is relative power, which in this case indicates a shift away from the West to the East.

Meant to be to You are naive in your projections over Europe's contestability over those geo-political areas. Countries want to back a winning horse. Are they going to go for the region which is suffering under low economic growth, and with a incoming demographic disaster coming up, or a rising region promising wealth, investment and prosperity? Now I've said it before, I don't support China at all, but their geopolitical strength in the future cannot be ignored.'

>>Canada is a feeling

Attached: 1550743803594.jpg (675x675, 69K)

I'm going to bed, I shouldn't be awake as it is. I look forward to reading your responses when I wake up. For what it's worth, I don't actually think it's a GOOD thing, unlike what China says, about Europe's relative decline. The principles of free trade, liberalism, the peaceful resolution of disputes and the rules-based global order are all going to be strained due to the power transitions. However the reality cannot be ignored, and facing the facts of the geopolitical and geostrategic environment is the best way of mitigating the potential harmful impacts.

its not about backing the winning horse.
its about common interests. north africa, turkey and the levant as I mentioned will have strong economic ties to europe due to proximity and connection over the med. sea. close ties to europe secure trade agreements.
backing the winning horse only makes sense if we talk about a new cold war.
but if most of your trade is with europe you prefer goodrelationships with europe over ones with china or the usa. security is a similar concern. europe is much closer. troubles in said areas can actually affect us, via terrorists and refugee waves. of course we are keen to cooperate in security matters with countries in the region. the usa or china dont care, they might just fuck up a country with no consequences.

>Would the EU supposedly "re-arm" in the face of US isolationism?
Mostly start caring about the military again. It's happening already
>We're not going to see the US any more anti-Europe than it is right now, and yet there has been no main military rearmamants within NATO.
Simply because NATO is the US. It doesn't have a reason to exist without America
>Exactly. But the pie getting bigger isn't relevant. All that matter is relative power, which in this case indicates a shift away from the West to the East.
And then from the East to Africa. As long as your interests are protected (as they are), percentages shifts matter little, especially now when everything is interconnected

when anglo leaves

Attached: eu.png (810x540, 1.25M)

Honestly I spit on the Germans, but not you France, not you

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.gif (280x160, 2.18M)

i spit exclusively on you tho, fuck bongs

france has a new bff now. fuck off. we all know brits only entered the eu to split the french of from the germans. well you failed. the sons of charlemagne shall never fight again.

Shouldn’t have left them alone at the beaches then

this

Attached: 1542561841112.webm (1920x1080, 2.43M)

Lmao imagine how fucked the climate would get

Enjoy being Germany's bitches. You were never our BFF, you were our little sistes now dating a NIgger Somali

We just wants some friends

Attached: 1523828390725.png (268x273, 72K)

says the cunt that spend almost a millenium since 1066 to hate on whatever the french do lmao

Dear friend, go and suck German cock. It's your right to do so. But us Brits would never bow down.
France will be in my opinion Western Civilisation's greatest lost. We haven't had a worth opponent since you

>g-g-go suck german dick reeeeee
Germany and France are brother countries since always, england is just a little island we colonised bringing culture and knowledges in so they can fuck us back..

elementry school girl tier quarrel right there

Attached: 1560275957774.png (464x401, 132K)

Welp, maybe you should move your European ass to Germany

why should i, i already live in France which makes the core of europe alongside with germany, we just need to expell parasites like yours and southerners

You are not French. Prouve-le moi

No self respecting French lickes the anus of Germany. He's probably a sand nigger living in France

Will ease tensions with Quebec. I'm all for it desu

j'ai rien à prouver a une saleté d'anglois de merde, grande tapin de salope de tous tes morts

Ta gueule sale pedale de merde je suis un quebecois et tes putains de theories a la con sont completement mongoles

quels théories ? que les angloizes sont des grandes tapins ? c'est pas des théories c'est avéré, maintenant coupe ton proxy ou retourne au pays des caribous tarbenaque d'hostie de tes morts la grace de chienne

Tu fais honte a la france et la francophonie, suicide toi mohammed

All the shit in the EU came from the members. If the members didn't have anti-white governments, the EU wouldn't be so gay either.

mais mdr, c'est toi saleté de traitre qui suce la biite angloize, de gaule se retourne dans sa tombe