/brit/

Haven't been to the cinema since 2015 (that was with a girl btw)

>In 1998, Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair passed the Human Rights Act, which swept into British law the European Convention on Human Rights (a pre-E.U. document dating from 1953). It also bound Britain to abide by decisions reached by the European Court of Human Rights, which sits in the French city of Strasbourg. Article 8.1 of the Convention (“Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence”) was supposed to protect people from the prying eyes of the state, as our Fourth Amendment does. But as the judge and scholar Jonathan (Lord) Sumption noted in a series of lectures this summer, it quickly became the “functional equivalent” of the due process clause of the American 14th Amendment—grounds for all kinds of judicial adventurism. British judges discovered that Article 8:

Football is back tomorrow. That time of the year when there’s both football and baseball on.

Attached: 1F8FB835-AEA2-4FE5-AED9-158A124C89F0.jpg (586x591, 60K)

always thought the shard was beside the walkie talkie etc

Is Messi autistic?

Can't abide these God awful scrapers in London. So fucking bland and unimaginative.

Went to a cinema in Portugal once, they had a fucking intermission lol

remember when sara's dad died? rather sad that isn't it

WHO OWNS DA NORF
>WE DO
WHO OWNS DA NORF
>WE DO
SHOW ME

Attached: images.png (201x251, 7K)

>potentially covers anything that intrudes upon a person’s autonomy unless the Court considers it to be justified…the legal status of illegitimate children, immigration and deportation, extradition, criminal sentencing, the recording of crime, abortion, artificial insemination, homosexuality and same sex unions, child abduction, the policing of public demonstrations, employment and social security rights, environmental and planning law, noise abatement, eviction for non-payment of rent and a great deal else besides.

Yeah lol, also there's a young version of Greedo in it.

youtube.com/watch?v=mwT_bBXy8bM
you tell me

>In the late 1990s, Blair began a reform of the House of Lords, depriving all but a few dozen hereditary peers of their right to sit. He replaced those ousted with a body that was meant to be more meritocratic but wound up less diverse and arguably more class-bound—a collection of activist foundation heads, “rights barristers” (as legal agitators are called), think-tank directors and in-the-tank journalists, and political henchmen. Judicial functions that the House of Lords once carried out were calved off into an actual Supreme Court, which took over as the high court of the land.

clairo is so fucking bad, how the fuck did she even get popular? surely an industry plant, absolutely dire shite

at least other art hoe music has vague redeeming quality

London liverpool street to norwich, arrive whenever best pleases you

the south brought it on themselves, hope they drown in it

Attached: 1564056937280.jpg (542x616, 95K)

you arrive in the city of pengdon

Attached: 48630615187_e7b4531a19_o.jpg (2400x1679, 2.34M)

Her dad was some rich guy with connections

yeah nobody cares
post it in a pastebin and fuck off

>Eventually even the reliably anti-Brexit Economist came to see that some of Britain’s major problems had arisen from constitutional meddling. David Cameron’s 2011 Fixed-Term Parliaments Act, in particular, made it much more difficult to call the general elections that would ordinarily have been provoked by the resounding repudiation of Theresa May’s withdrawal package. Blair and Cameron, the magazine noted, “came to power when history was said to have come to an end. They saw no need to take particular care of the constitution.” E.U. membership hid these problems—if Britain wasn’t paying attention to its constitution at the time, it was partly because it had been using someone else’s.

wish i could experience the charge of the light brigade

BLESS THIS IMMUNITY

i kill myself and my body gets instantly looted by minority youth

Thanks to Game of Thrones millions of Northerners will now no longer be mistaken for Australians/Irish by Americans.
Thank you for your service.

Attached: 1561916260495.jpg (760x752, 114K)

went with my bro to the TDK

honestly commented that CIA was 'one of us'

literally don't remember the movie after said plane scen

Alright I'll come by Norwich at 1! Thanks man

>These shifts in Britain’s constitutional culture have become obvious during the rolling European migration crisis of recent decades. The more courts took control of immigration policy, the harder immigration was to stop. As home secretary under David Cameron, May promised to limit Britain’s galloping population growth to “tens of thousands a year, not hundreds of thousands.” But net migration has been running at around a quarter-million ever since, rising as high as 333,000 in 2015. Last year, according to Migration Watch U.K., net migration was 258,000. That means 74,000 Europeans added to 232,000 non-Europeans who arrived, and 48,000 Britons who left. May was just a talker when it came to immigration policy, but no politician in three decades had done any better. Once the judiciary rules politics, all politicians are just talkers. Understand that, and you are most of the way to understanding Brexit.

fuck i just despise blair so much through and through

Do year 10 english and you'll experience it

*grabs a pint at the Founders Arms on the river*
pengdon

>The transfer of competences from legislatures to courts is a superb thing for the rich, because of the way the constitution interacts with occupational sociology. Where the judiciary is drawn from the legal profession, and where the legal profession is credentialed by expensive and elite professional schools, judicialization always means a transfer of power from the country at large to the richest sliver of it. This is true no matter what glorious-sounding pretext is found to justify the shift—racial harmony, European peace, a fair shake for women. In a global age, judicial review is a tool that powerful people expect to find in a constitution, in the same way one might expect to find a hair dryer in a hotel room.

CIA walked past me one day in the street and I was honestly starstruck

Black kids throw acid in my face and steal my phone as I lay on the ground riving in pain

youtube.com/watch?v=IR8NvbZUs8M

can anyone say this is honestly a good song? how the fucks this pub singer getting on jimmy kimmel, radio 1 etc. in a weeks span lmao

I want to have sex with Emma Watson.

Attached: F76C2544-2E3B-4BDD-AE85-BB9EB2FA8121.jpg (497x747, 58K)

I got drunk at the White Hart by Liverpool Street station

Show was a bit confusing as you had English, Irish and Scottish actors all ostensibly from the same regions of the same country but speaking in their native accents.

Saw a ford pickup with a usa license plate today

>From the beginning, a certain number of Remainers had called for a second referendum, arguing that the people had not really known what they were voting for when they chose Brexit. The Independent newspaper had the gall to call this hypothetical rerun a “People’s Vote,” though sometimes they called it a “Final Say.” The People themselves were suspicious. It was the oldest trick in the E.U. book to hold second referenda when—and only when—the public’s wishes diverged from those of Brussels. It had been used in Denmark in 1993 and in Ireland in 2002 and 2009. By 2017, though, these do-overs had become a Europe-wide symbol of contempt for voters. And that is why Parliament voted overwhelmingly in March 2017 to validate the referendum, activate the E.U.’s Article 50, and fix the date for British withdrawal.

no way, i saw like 6. fags are everywhere

stay in my hotel room the entire time ordering just eat as big cities give make me anxious

did it have a gun rack?

Here’s a baby Muskox

Attached: IMG_20190907_193437.jpg (1024x693, 74K)

ye with coors light in

>But there were a couple of details left. Article 50 called for a two-year negotiating period between the seceding country and the E.U., in order that the two might come to an optimal post-separation arrangement. From the outset there was a dangerous asymmetry of motives. Britain had nothing against its neighbors on the continent—it sought only the right to make its own decisions again. The E.U.’s leaders, however, had an incentive to inflict maximum hardship on Britain. In most member countries the E.U. was being blamed for stagnating economies, dizzying inequality, and out-of-control immigration. If Britain were granted a pain-free exit, others would follow suit.

You will have to buy your ticket online tonight and post it on here for me to take you seriously tho.

you drop out of hyperspeed within range of the automated defense systems aboard 8837 Pengdon and receive clearance for landing

Attached: 8837 pengdon.jpg (737x581, 61K)

Wish I could have experienced the Siege of Tenochtitlan

as if trying to order a just eat to hotel room wouldn't cause you massive anxiety

Come across a major discovery lads
Look at a woman's face. Now imagine if it was slightly more masculine, and on a male body. If she looks like she'd be an incel if she was male, she's ugly. You're just distracted by her tits. If she looks like she'd be a good looking lad, she's a genuinely good looking woman.
Androgyny= key to beauty.

Leftypol sits in silence as Professor Norf Rorke lays down exactly the kind of slimy globalist tricks Leftypol has been indoctrinated into shilling for

Such a touchy subject. Like when you forget if its Greg Norman or Russell Crowe that comes from New Zealand or Australia and they get all bent outta shape and pissy about it, it might help if your flags weren't identical

well I, for one, am enjoying reading it

The Starks were a good example of this as Sean Bean is English, the woman who played Cat is Northern Irish and the guy who played Robb Stark is Scottish

>Early in the negotiating process, Britain’s ambassador to the E.U., the Brussels insider Ivan Rogers, submitted his resignation, warning that Britain was going to get its head handed to it at the bargaining table. “Serious multilateral negotiating experience is in short supply in Whitehall,” he wrote, “and that is not the case in the [European] Commission or in the Council.” He was right about that, and it was a lesson in the sociology of Brexit. In England, at least, the electoral map of Brexit looked like the electoral map of Donald Trump’s presidential victory in America would look later that year. Remain was the choice of those who benefited from the global economy. It won overwhelmingly in a few compact islands of rich people, intellectuals, and minorities—London, Oxford, Cambridge. The ranks of Remain-aligned politicians were crowded with well-educated, tech-savvy, cosmopolitan people. Leave won everyplace else. It was the choice of yesterday’s Britain, the Britain of losers.

what's the story behind that then

White ford pickup, ranger I think.The plate was similar to this

No

Attached: GovUS2001A1a.jpg (700x353, 63K)

This article was fantastic ngl, best written piece on brexit since the referendum was held

Blumpf on tour

explain yourself faker

>Even after its victory, Leave found itself constantly out-thought, out-classed, and out-worked by Remain. May made David Davis, a party bull approaching the end of his career, her chief negotiator. He didn’t seem to think the post would require too much energy, expertise, or imagination—because, at the end of the day, Britain could walk away from the negotiating table with no deal. How could May have put Brexit at risk by picking someone like Davis to secure it? Well, how could Donald Trump have put his presidency at risk by picking someone like Jeff Sessions to defend it? The answer in both cases was the same: in populist causes, the pickings are slim, personnel-wise.

oh i thought you meant a real pickup

Leftypol clutching his ruined anus

I have only seen one right hand drive car in my life here, it was some classy old British car

russia stronk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Europe

The best we get here is the Deranged version of the ranger

>Constantly belittling the public for not understanding the ins and outs of negotiating trade agreements, Rogers, for all his smarts, failed to understand that a) this was a negotiation about something deeper than trade, and b) the sovereign people sets parameters for negotiators, not vice versa. Rogers could not see that his countrymen did not feel the same loyalty to the E.U. and its “process” that he did. He couldn’t imagine why people would want it to go away.

Imagine my shock

>Rogers and other British experts were strangely unimpressed by the powerful practical levers their own side disposed of. Britain was the largest importer of cars from Germany. It had a trade deficit with most countries on the continent, which meant that any breakdown in talks would idle more European factories than British ones. It was, with France, one of only two serious military powers in Western Europe. It had an intelligence-gathering relationship with the United States that continental Europe was desperate to preserve the benefits of. It contained 40% of Europe’s data servers. It was due to recover its own rich fishing banks—schools of mackerel north of Scotland, beds of prawns southwest of Cornwall—where E.U. vessels took 59% of the haul. And it was the financial capital of the world. The E.U. would have no choice but to do business with an independent Britain.

2008 credit crunch is now referred to as the Great Recession

half way through watching a documentary on the BTK killer, seems like a top lad

99% of the norf accents on the show are straight up northern English.
Don't know why mind, Scots would have blended in fairly well.

The absolute state of 20 fenchurch street

>ranger
Was it the brand new one? New model this year, first in a while

As of April 2019, there are more than 50 buildings 100 metres (330 ft) tall under construction in the UK – 40 in London, 7 in Greater Manchester, 3 in Birmingham, 2 in Liverpool, and 1 in Woking.

>And yet there was a hangdog tone in all elite descriptions of the Article 50 discussions. People were wishing their own country ill in an international negotiation. “If I were an E.U. negotiator,” wrote the Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament Sir Ed Davey in a fantasy of his own country’s humiliation that appeared in the Independent, “my starting position would be to increase the divorce fee to £50bn, arguing that the U.K. must now pay the E.U.’s cost of handling the no-deal Brexit, after refusing the first deal. Given the severely negative impact of a no-deal Brexit on everything from our sheep farmers to our NHS [National Health Service], I rather think any U.K. government would be so desperate to make some deals that £50bn might suddenly seem a bargain.”

He gets caught in the most ridiculous way - you will have a good laugh

>Remainers’ hearts were with the Europeans at the table, not with the Brexiteers who were supposed to be their countrymen. There may be an innocent “epistemological” explanation for this. When a regime is changing, the old world is made of concrete things that have lost their legitimacy, while the world to come is made up of legitimate things that have not yet become concrete. Rogers hated the whole enterprise of undoing existing E.U. structures: “[W]e are privileging notional autonomy to make our own laws over real power to set the rules by which in practice we shall be governed.” The Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf similarly saw no point in the Brexiteer reluctance to bind Britain’s trade policy to the E.U.’s. “It would only prevent the U.K. from making trade deals that are less important than maintaining good relations with the E.U.,” Wolf wrote in the Financial Times.

Nah it was the old one, don't think they sell the grim base model single cab here which is what it was

I only want just one sniff.

Attached: A08DFD24-C558-4558-ABAF-9E3054D4A51F.jpg (543x768, 102K)

That was such bullshit. Cheating Pep got lucky that game

For me it's the BT Tower

Attached: 32375931028_541dcd1ae4_b.jpg (725x1024, 221K)

>Every negotiator on the British side behaved as if there were nothing more important than maintaining good relations with the E.U. Perhaps that was to be expected. The E.U. pursues the goal of transcending (a fancy way to say “getting rid of”) the nation-states that make it up. As the Union grows ever closer, there must eventually come a moment when the loyalty of subjects is transferred from the institutions of the nation to those of federal Europe. Brexit showed that, for elites to whom the E.U. offers a grand role, that moment has come already. The E.U., not Britain, is their country. They saw Brexit not as most British people did—as a solemn and even sacred uprising by an ancient people against a usurper. No. Elites saw Brexit as a local nuisance in the domestic politics of the only legitimate custodian of Britain’s long-term interests: the E.U.

you posted this before

Lol forgot about that it was peak boomer

What's the thing that looks like this in Liverpool called?

The anglo is immunised against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, pirate, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off an anorak. But call him a Brit and you will be astonished at how he doesn't recoil, how uninjured he is, how he suddenly guffaws: “Yeah pal, have you got a problem with that?”

about to have a filthy, raunchy, greasy, stinky, sweaty, musky, gassy, moist coom sesh

Attached: 1557124267952.png (1044x869, 185K)

Ah yes depression coming back again just in time for Autumn.

st johns beacon
went up it a few months ago, windows are dirty af