Why do these stupid fucking relayers keep spamming these low quality no effort 0xBTC posts? Like seriously shut the fuck up. Where did they come from Jow Forumsbros? Can we get them banned from this damn board please? Who else finds it so fucking annoying. It’s literally a SHA256 Bitcoin clone on Ethereum. God damn pajeet poo eating spammers. Fuck you all and shut the fuck up. No one is gonna buy your premined scam.
Huuurrr duuurrr 0xButtcoin is the real BCH
Chase Richardson
Other urls found in this thread:
etherscan.io
twitter.com
Camden Walker
that image was posted in the discord like 15 minutes ago
Justin Price
It's a solid project with a real chance for growth. I wish I had been shilled this hard on BTC back in the day.
Christian Anderson
yep thats how we felt when bcash shitheads and stinkies started spamming this forum
Landon Thomas
But why OxBogcoin? Why not something actually useful?
Evan Robinson
This shit is going to make me so fucking rich
Julian Peterson
shut up, shill, kek
Gabriel Bailey
I’m beginning to think that 0xBtc is a scam.. guys I’ve read through the contract and although I only know js, I’m certain I see something very very wrong. There seems be an exception in sending address formatting, allowing a certain address to drain the supply not yet mined.
Init: (supplyTotalAddress: “0x1******”
1 > 2: a = b -c
returnSender supply.amountTotal(intUserSend)
minerNonce = success
I see something fishy there, some pajeet shit. This thing stinks and if you’re not fluent in code it might look okay, but let me analyze this in English for you. That total supply address holds all tokens in the smart contract to be minted through successful nonces (solutions [miner]). When that address is the one listed in the contract the total remaining supply is returned to sender. This shit reeks stay FAR FAR AWAY. I’ve warned you. My team is going to figure this exploit out and fuck 0xshitcoin. Be warned.
Caleb Johnson
Does your dad happen to work at Nintendo?
Evan Garcia
pretty low-quality fud, I mean really, "1>2"? None of this shit is in the code, anyone can verify that.
etherscan.io
Connor Baker
Your post's "magic address" is not in the contract, as anyone can see. In fact, none of your code is there. Yawwwwn
Christian Harris
sure looking that way :)
Ryder Carter
based "going to make me so fucking rich" poster
Isaiah Anderson
>It’s literally a SHA256 Bitcoin clone
No it literally isnt. It shares the same difficulty adjustment for token distribution but thats it.
Camden Collins
>real chance for growth
What growth? Is this shit gonna get segwit or lightning? How about 10mb blocks?
Oh wait, there are no blocks, not even a blockchain kek
Connor Mitchell
yup different algo as anyone knowledgeable on the token and erc918 in general will tell you. Old debunked fud with 0 research put in
Adrian Roberts
This shit is gonna get casper, plasma and sharding, which will scale it way beyond BTC or BCH.
Nathan Sanchez
Not fud, Im just correcting the retarded OP.
Leo Morales
Yeah, pretty sure the other user was talking about OP's FUD.
Jonathan Reyes
brainlet here
but doesnt it use SHA3?
Ayden Phillips
Taking them one by one:
"Init" - only present as part of "Initial" in a comment.
"supplyTotalAddress" - not present at all.
"0x1" - not present at all.
"1 > 2" - not present at all, whitespace-insensitive search.
"a = b -c" - not present at all, whitespace-insensitive search, any permutation/fragment.
"returnSender" - not present at all.
"supply" - only present as part of a name.
"amountTotal" - not present at all.
"intUserSend" - not present at all.
"minerNonce" - not present at all.
"success" - only present as UNUSED function args.
John Price
Correction: "success" is a RETURN value, not an arg.
That's what I get for reading code on too little sleep.
Cameron Hernandez
Oh snap I realized OP is an anti 0xbtc post. I thought it was a shill.
Jackson Ward
Olala. Another 0xBTC post.