Preach socialism as a poor person

blame Republicans, boomers, and neo-cons

>noooo you can't start a union without obeying the proper procedures of the taft-hartley act!

Attached: soy seething.png (231x218, 8K)

Americans are the biggest bootlickers on the planet. They make mainlander Chinese look rebellious and freespirited by comparison.

off grid libertarian socialism is your best bet until you can have your way. Your people will be farmers and cryptominers and hackers/pirates. You can rotate people among agro, mining, and piracy. Of course at first, you'd need to own a parcel but take advantage of the affordable prices now before they go up. Do this before I do.

>tfw no comrades to start a commune and begin red prepping with

>off grid libertarian socialism

not a large scale solution to any society, just bougie individualistic mindset

pay no nevermind camarada

Attached: jestersociety.jpg (847x600, 72K)

I think it's trying to communicate

Attached: 1563337576329.png (750x375, 110K)

>preach socialism
yikes

Why is socialism getting more and more popular in the US? In the rest of the world it's diminishing
Socialists here mostly boomers and will die in the next few decades

Learn english and read it.

BECAUSE OUR LIFE IS FUCKING SHIT

Society is the summation of an entire population's thoughts and actions. Saying "we should improve society" is the same as "everyone else has a problem, not me".

Attached: 1434945998496.jpg (258x270, 24K)

anarchists are libs, news at 11
because the US never took steps to preserve capitalism, only accelerate its demise

>I suffer in America

Attached: seattle.jpg (650x364, 62K)

>being this much of an individualist
I thought this sort of flaccid centrism only existed in parody.

>anarchist are libs
>IF YOU CRITICIZE STALIN YOU'RE A FUCKING RADLIB
Why do tankies do this?

A lot of people want to change society you fucking moron. Explain all the revolutions that ever happened. fucking hell you are stupid lol

Attached: 1567381745672.jpg (1024x1028, 107K)

Attached: 1567115689582.jpg (815x520, 42K)

Capitalism is a failing ideology.

the overwhelming majority of people that preach socialism in the US are champagne socialists

>A lot of people want to change society
Is that supposed to contradict something I said?

Attached: 1561218612838.png (358x242, 104K)

Nice opinion, thanks for sharing.

>everyone who isn't an anarchist is a tankie
bruh

Attached: anarchists mls centrist marxist.png (500x500, 384K)

when Americans say "socialism", we just mean things like not going bankrupt because you had to go to the doctor or paying $100k a year for college (i.e. what Europoors and Asians take for granted)

lol mate socialism, communism and fascism all have failed. Capitalism is the only ideology that has been able to sustain a nation for more than a century.

>the only alternative to capitalism's self-destruction is le ebil digtatorshibs
good argument

>he says while enjoying his socialist healthcare and welfare system

*clears throat*

Attached: 7827905._SX318_.jpg (318x375, 30K)

Attached: 1498630437968.png (644x794, 135K)

>capitalism will self-destruct any day now

Attached: 1542243382886.png (1838x1282, 402K)

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: shocked bordiga.jpg (1200x1091, 80K)

>I am a revolutionary by handing out pamphlets of Garl Marggs

You forgetting something, peasant?

Attached: Alice1[1].jpg (360x348, 16K)

Dang when did they change flag.

For me? It's human capitalism.

>implying I’m on welfare
>implying I’ve been to hospital in my adult life

Seems to me that the anarchists were right again! Politics and the party of have become the new religion! Marxists:
0 Anarchists:1

Average rent in Seattle is 2,400 Dollars for 65m2. Even if you make six figures, you'll be lucky to have 2k a month after tax and all expenditures

People are way too defensive of capitalism. When the limits of communist planning hit a brick wall in the 80s, the system had to change or collapse. Since the 80s, capitalism has also provided extremely limited wealth increases in the western world. In Canada, something like 50% of the population are $200 away from bankruptcy and "From 1982 to 2015, the share of total income going to those in the top 1 per cent grew from 8 per cent to 14.2 per cent — a jump of 78 per cent. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the bottom 50 per cent — half the country — fell by 29 per cent. So while our economy has grown, the bulk of those gains are flowing to the richest 1 per cent of people."

People are too dense and easily swayed by their fucking little trinkets to see capitalism has some serious issues that will become extremely problematic in decades ahead

lol I’d rather be poor than starve to death in a gulag.

You'll be just fine outside of the major cities. I have almost paid my mortgage and I'm not even 30 yet

Once automation is here it's over. Automation is of course extremely more efficient than humans but at the rate we're going the rich will yet again just get richer off the gains of automation and the unemployed masses will just crumble

You won't starve in a gulag unless capitalist countries sanction you.

>what is engineering
>what is non-physical labour
>what are interaction-based jobs

*marries each others countries royalties*
*gets abundant 'king of -countries-' titles*
heh, nothing personal peasant, you have to work for it.

I didn't say we need to literally bring back stalinism, dumbass
Situation is infinitely shittier in neolib Canada, I'm afraid.
Pretty much. Automation of basic driving and reception/accountant jobs will fuck a lot of shit up

A job market based entirely on service and white-collar professionalism is not sustainable. There simply isn't enough work to go around for everyone to provide for their families without some sort of dividend or handout.

It's always so cute when Anglo-Sphere countries discuss capitalism or socialism. It's either dog eat dog crapitalism or Gulag Archipelago. The inferior Albion simply has never heard of social market economy master race. :^)

Attached: Onkel Helmut.jpg (1200x800, 425K)

>implying Lenin did nothing wrong
>implying Mao did nothing wrong
>implying Pol Pot did nothing wrong

You benefit from them indirectly even if you haven't personally directly benefited from these institutions, you dumb fucking Jow Forumstard.

willing to bet hard-earned money that commoner hands typed this post

Attached: peasant coming through.jpg (720x671, 188K)

We just need to start eating them already.

But you're american too

So this is what goes in the mind of the right.

Attached: 1564858102337.jpg (480x364, 25K)

Lenin was a rich kid.

t. modern leftist who thinks everyone right of Trotsky is a Jow Forumstard

Lmao, communism in China pulled 700 million out of poverty.

>Explain all the revolutions

People with actual power using people's contempt to install themselves in power.

If people wanting to change things actually mattered on itself there wouldn't ever had any stable society on earth

Capitalism did.

trotsky is pretty Jow Forums though

Attached: cpusa trot.jpg (540x462, 14K)

Deng Xiaoping reforms were anything but communism. Chinks got poor due to retarded Maoist policies. Which one is communism now?

I think in america alone only 8% of jobs are held by people with stem degrees. The majority of workforce is retail and food services. You think every trucker and coal miner is going to make the cut to design self driving trucks and mining robots?

>American education

Under socialism you had everything you needed for a happy life. In capitalism you all this crap you don't need and is bad for you but basic shelter, good food and enough to raise a family is hard to come by.

>marxist leninist
>haven't read marx
Marxism-Leninism is the only real marxism.

Communist faggots love to spout those one liners when we are more indebted and surveilled than ever

Debt slavery is literally the bread and butter of capitalism you dolt

Marxism-Leninism has nothing to do with anything Marx or Lenin ever said

That is my point

gtfo leftcom

Except for the part where its literally all based off marx's ideas with lenin's additions.

*leans back in armchair*

Attached: monopoly no.jpg (900x900, 117K)

>You won't starve in a gulag unless capitalist countries sanction you.

Sanctions had nothing to do with the gulags.
China is doing that shit right now.
Half the world was "socialist" and they were still blaming the capitalist countries for their problems.
How come we didn't need them?
Communism is a just a religion for atheists. Communism it's self is a utopian dream state where people have evolved into peaceful subservient cooperative beings.
It's like the weird pamphlets Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses leave on your door with pastel drawings of children of all races playing together with the animals and shit in some paradise.
That's why nothing is ever "real communism"... it's socialism, which is the widely varying systems of state control seen as necessary to bring about the communist utopia.
It's the "dictatorship of the proletariat" of which Marx stated "their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions".
That's why the far-left collects such a cluster-fuck of any sort of angry radicals they can, even though they often have completely opposing ideologies other than extreme animosity towards current western systems. Their goal is to ruin everything and create chaos and misery to the point where their nanny state control over everything starts looking good.

lots of retards and literal jews push it in university elective and liberal arts classes that most people have to take, it doesnt help when a bunch of trannies take some useless degree and then complain about muh debt because they were too stupid to use google before picking their degree

lowkey based, didnt think there was any fellow leftists on a tibetan ceramic forums

Communism has literally never been implemented

this
i need dicatorship of the prolies NOW

tfw i'll never speak rich

Attached: yes I speak Jewish.png (633x290, 17K)

>socialism failed because of capitalism
That's like saying my rocket could totally fly if it weren't for all this air weighing it down.

Attached: 1523530658294.jpg (582x960, 84K)

in a communist state who will be enforcing that the goods are distributed equitably to people, and who decides what equitable is? if there is no state then is it just a communal lynch mob or something?

This. I'm surprised how little Ludwig Erhard's policies are brought up as positive example, in Anglo politics, Germany went from ruins to the center of Europe's economy.

The dictatorship of the proletariat

did you accidentally just admit only non-working people are socialists?