Has a more noble, honourable, beautiful nation ever existed?

Has a more noble, honourable, beautiful nation ever existed?

Attached: british flag.jpg (1280x720, 114K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Canadians
youtube.com/watch?v=_qhLPWcm-0w
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Rome_in_World_War_II
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Don't even think it's possible, lad.

Oui

Attached: LA FRANCE.jpg (1024x644, 134K)

Spain.

Attached: 1559795573489.jpg (722x941, 135K)

Niger

A
FUCKING
RAMP

hallo

Attached: 1481053323519.jpg (320x316, 26K)

yeah but it was destroyed

Attached: german_empire_1871_by_cyowari_dcl3a5v-pre.jpg (1031x775, 137K)

>plunge the world in a collective massacre
>all because some dude and the varg tier pagan autism

ALL HAIL IJN AND JMSDF!!!!!!!!

Attached: 40855103_p0.jpg (1679x1200, 1.56M)

Yeah it's called literally any other country

>colonizes half the world

we did it for money, not some misplaced racial autism

Argentina

Ever heard that one animaniacs song?

Right

Attached: 1567525045231.png (785x1000, 254K)

>pretty much spearheaded scientific racism and innovative racist polices.

Attached: 1531461592508.jpg (960x576, 58K)

You don't have to post a picture of yourself as a reply when I'm correct, my seething friend

>makes a retarded statement
>someone replies with a soyboy
>NO U

slanderous lies

Attached: 1562733288894.jpg (552x828, 45K)

>>makes a retarded statement
a correct statement
>>someone replies with a soyboy
a soyboy replies
>>NO U
not an argument

I've asked this question so much lately but no one has told me, so once again, why do leafs make so many cringy posts? And have such shit opinions?

You essentially responded with NO U, that's less of an argument than actually proving how your initial statement is in any way true

I responded to a non-argument (a meme picture that wasn't even used as it's supposed to be used) with a non-argument, what's the problem? And really, a man with no arms could count the amount of "noble, honourable, beautiful" things the UK has done with his remaining fingers

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Canadians

>And really, a man with no arms could count the amount of "noble, honourable, beautiful" things the UK has done with his remaining fingers

Attached: 1554645348243.jpg (785x731, 101K)

based

That "non argument" is typically an implication that you made a retarded/cringy/uneducated statement, now please stop arguing about this argument and elaborate how "literally any country" as bested us in the listed elements

Please shut the fuck up

have sex rorke

>indebted Greece to rothschilds in 1830s
>Imposed austerity on us in 1870s
>Abandoned us in the greco turkish war in 1890s
>Stole our land in 1913 to create Albania
>Invaded us in ww1 for not supporting their anti German blood feud
>Abandoned us in 1920
>dragged us into ww2 onto the losers side against our med brothers
>
Gave us napalm to use against our own civilians in our civil war
>Abandoned Cyprus
>Imposed EU austerity
>Opposed Grexit
fuck you

Attached: 1554032534665.png (691x653, 20K)

>as
has*

youtube.com/watch?v=_qhLPWcm-0w

Attached: 1557981551946.png (1000x1000, 225K)

Attached: 1567680370721.png (633x758, 335K)

Only two of those are me, regardless, your point?

>That "non argument" is typically an implication that you made a retarded/cringy/uneducated statement
It's typically an implication the poster hasn't reached puberty and has no argument
>now please stop arguing about this argument and elaborate how "literally any country" as bested us in the listed elements
The UK has negative score in all of the listed elements so while my statement may have been slightly hyperbole, it still applies when considering civilized countries only

have sex?

>Gave us napalm to use against our own civilians in our civil war
thank you for your service

london paki absolutely seething

fuck you anglo kike

Attached: 1547492612015.jpg (598x687, 75K)

Based

>still arguing over what was implied by either party
>continues to state that the UK is lacking in all the listed elements without any evidence or reference ergo clearly based off of either assumption or bias
Do you have an actual argument to back your initial statement or are you gonna keep trying to argue over whether my argument was a non argument or the use of the soyboy meme and keep going round in circles?
You're a braindead shitposter got it

That'd be Venice

Attached: Repubblica_di_Venezia.png (1000x635, 114K)

> Britain
> noble
> honourable
> beautiful

Is this so called British joke? I think it's not sophisticated enough

you always get me confused with him lol

Maybe I'd bother finding evidence if any proof was posted that UK had actually ever done anything listed in the OP, but none is, so I can't bother for an argument on a Fijian handicrafts forum.
Actually, maybe you really are doing something beautiful and noble with the no-deal brexit. Should be some top-tier comedy for the rest of the year.

>I have no idea what I'm talking about so I keep finding reasons to dodge the actual argument
>Actually, maybe you really are doing something beautiful and noble with the no-deal brexit. Should be some top-tier comedy for the rest of the year.
Ahhhhh that explains it.

if OP wanted serious replies to his shit thread he would've presented examples of "noble, honourable, beautiful" things the UK has done

Japanese Empire

>Aye.

Attached: 1566745147301.jpg (235x283, 16K)

>he still doesn't have any actual evidence to back his shitty opinion that he claims is fact
>still trying to rationalise his inability to provide proof/references by claiming it's the OPs fault for his logical flaws

even Albania is more noble honorable beautiful than England

You're honestly just talking out of your ass if you think that. Unless judging by your illiteracy I'm willing to assume you're Albanian, otherwise why would you list such a random country

>>he still doesn't have any actual evidence to back his shitty opinion that he claims is fact
true, just like OP's shitty baseless implication
>>still trying to rationalise his inability to provide proof/references by claiming it's the OPs fault for his logical flaws
neither of us provided any evidence so the weight of our arguments are equal at zero

I wasn't the one who made an absurd statement to begin with, in each reply of mine I've insisted that you provide evidence to back such a statement, but it's becoming increasingly obvious that you're basing it off of assumption and have no idea what you're talking about. So either provide evidence/references as to how we're so lacking or stop wasting my time by getting so petty over the whole concept of this argument rather than the matter at hand.

He is right and you know it
Even Analbanians are more honorable than you that means you are even LESS honorable than Analbanians

I like the UK and its culture
Shame about the cuisine being trash

the UK is unironically the protagonist of the world

Except he isn't and you're both full of shit

I'm not wasting your time, you're the one that keeps replying when you could just walk away from this non-argument where neither side is providing anything factual to back their statements. As for you not making the initial argument, that is irrelevant as you are still on that side for taking their defense.

>believing a stereotype

I suppose I could but it's sort of amusing to catch your bluff, because every reply you give just shows more and more that you don't have a clue what you're on about, and continue to try going back and forth with the whole "argument non argument" bullshit in order to dodge the subject matter.

not a stereotype, black pudding's fucking disgusting

Whenever I've asked an anglophobe how Britain is dishonourable or perfidious they just dodge or mutter about how England killed a French POW 900 years ago or something like that. I've never had this stereotype explained to me. And no going to war with Germany is not perfidy.

Muy basado

Attached: Spanish_Empire_Allegory.png (790x524, 1.24M)

With what kind of propaganda is filled your "history" books?

You fucking destroyed it with opium

Attached: 2C480E39-C4F2-469B-AB45-E3DF329D2313.jpg (902x643, 181K)

You say it's amusing, so would you retract your statement that I was wasting your time? If it's not clear yet, I'm not stupid enough to make a serious reply to a shitpost thread

Have you actually tried it? If so where, and how?
Also I don't think a single case represents an entire selection

Lmao what?
I dont give a fuck about France you guys bombed Italian cities full of civilians even after our surrending
Inb4 lol get rekt
Yes you are dishonarble and cowards that has always to rely on powerful allies to get shit done never winning a war on its own

What kind of shit quality bait do you think you're posting?

I CLENCH MY FIST AND BEAT IT

Attached: image0.png (365x676, 196K)

>you guys bombed Italian cities full of civilians even after our surrending

Attached: 1567629902229.png (454x520, 11K)

Attached: 1565339569842.jpg (1920x1080, 1.46M)

based anglos are rats

Attached: cartagena de indias.png (256x847, 154K)

Thank for posting the best thing anglos can do
Claim shit they never did for themselves

I have no clue what you're talking about, you'll have to be more specific. The Allied air campaign was of questionable morality but it wasn't dishonourable, in fact being a bomber pilot was one of the most certain ways to get killed in that period.

>Battle of Chartagena
>Carthage
Based fitting their barbaric culture

I say it's amusing because I know deep down you have the faintest idea what you're talking about and every reply is a cover up of that fact, you claim you're not stupid enough to argue on a thread that's all of a sudden, a "shitposting thread" (which is really a couple of braindead Euros posting low quality bait), yet you've taken time to go back and forth over this whole argument and the reasoning behind it than anything of value in regards to any country in the world besting us

>that has always to rely on powerful allies to get shit done never winning a war on its own
euros getting used on the regular

Attached: 1566609504606.jpg (531x434, 111K)

Are we talking about bombers or about countries?
Individials are of fluctuating moralities but your country is the one who gave the orders

>OOOHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST LET YOUR ALLIES FIGHT THE WAR AND TAKE CREDIT

Attached: 1560280109398.jpg (785x731, 112K)

When you will be really on your own without allies you will see how all those years of outsourcing combats is worth for you

>Yes you are dishonarble and cowards that has always to rely on powerful allies to get shit done never winning a war on its own
>Thank for posting the best thing anglos can do
Claim shit they never did for themselves
>b-b-but your nationalism revolves around cowardice and never doing anything yourselves
>posts solid evidence of such claims proving to be false
>b-b-but nationalism is stupid, you can't take credit for something you didn't do first hand!!!
>this is definitely just a British thing and not something virtually anyone does in defence of their country and what it stands for

>Has a more noble, honourable, beautiful nation ever existed?
Yes, and they are not white apes though.

Attached: 1560771501744.jpg (736x744, 165K)

every Catholic country past and present

Well even if you're talking about the strategy of aerial bombing there's still nothing unique about the UK or the Allies doing it, ours is only remembered and argued over because it was the successful one. Are V2 rockets that can't target anything within a 50 mile radius dishonourable?

>oh no, our average iq score is 1 point below the others, while being a perfectly reasonable average score regardless

I'd only have to mention colonization or things related to that like slavery, which is none of the "noble, honourable, beautiful" mentioned in OP to have more points against the UK than anyone in this thread has for them, but I didn't because I figured you'd keep replying longer

there is nothing dishonourable about slavery

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Rome_in_World_War_II

>Many Americans were against a major destruction of Rome. However, the British War Cabinet refused to see bombing Rome as a crime against humanity. The first bombardment occurred on July 19, 1943 and was carried out by 500 American bombers which dropped 1,168 tons of bombs. The entire working class district of San Lorenzo was destroyed, and 3,000 Italian civilians were killed in the raids over five residential/railway districts. The military targets were few...

>pic related says: from the "liberators"

You rats lack dignity, honor and everything that makes man human

Attached: Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-476-2094-17A,_Italien,_Rom,_zerstörtes_Gebäude.jpg (800x531, 58K)

There is everything dishonourable about killing and enslaving people who never had a chance against you. Saying it isn't is like saying it's honourable to win a fight when you have an assault rifle when the other side has a knife.

>I'd only have to mention colonization or things related to that like slavery, which is none of the "noble, honourable, beautiful" mentioned in OP
Except we ended the international slave trade and forced other countries to do the same at the might of our empire

It's almost like almost every powerful European country enslaved Africans, even going to the sadistic lengths Belgium did before we exposed them for it

seething dagos on the rag

The unicity comes from the sheer amount of damage
And not its not about being successful because killing citizen is not a hard task to accomplish we are talking about plain evil from your shitty and overrated leaders elected by equally shitty britons

Doesn't change the fact you did it as well
True, but it still isn't honourable in any sense and is dishonourable in every sense