Would they be culturally closer to East Asians and Southeast Asians if they didn't get kebab'd?

Would they be culturally closer to East Asians and Southeast Asians if they didn't get kebab'd?

Attached: india-political-map.gif (600x727, 97K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi_Sultanate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire
worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/india-will-worlds-highest-muslim-population-2060
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

No and we aren't kebab'd.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi_Sultanate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire
worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/india-will-worlds-highest-muslim-population-2060

>*visits Taj Mahal*
>No
>*speaks Muslim language filled with Persian and Arabic*
>and
>*eats tandoori food made by Muslims*
>we
>*names country after a Muslim river*
>aren’t
>*shits in Hindu holy rivers*
>kebab’d

...

>tandoori food
Created by Punjabi Hindus
>Muslim language
Barely 15-20 % of vocabulary of spoken hindi is from Persian or Arabic, and there is barely any of it in formal hindi.

East and SEA borrowed from our culture so yeah.
>Indus
>Muslim
kek. Sindhu appears alongside Ganga in most Hindu texts.

it's like English should be called a Greek language because there are many words from Greek into English. fucking retarded.

I know that arch which Japs put in front of temples or near seaside is originally Indian architecture.

To be fair, English is a mutt language.

Hindi is a mutt language too, but calling it a Muslim language would be disingenuous.

We're kebab'd too and we don't even wear Turban or make Muslim domed buildings like they do

It was designed by the Muslim elite to be intelligible to Muslims
According to google it was made in central India by Muslims

Turban was think in South Asia even before Muslims.

Well to be frank Muslim rule over India is considered to be one of the most brutal Islamic rules in history. Timur the Muslim Mongol from Uzbekistan literally built pyramids of Hindus and Jains skulls.

The river is occupied by Muslims. It doesn’t matter that it’s in some Hindu book.
You’ll always be named after a Pakistani Muslim river. Cope more.

>It was designed by the Muslim elite to be intelligible to Muslims
No it was a dialect of khariboli you retarded paki.

Mughal rulers brought with them to India the Persian language.[27][42][43] The Turko-Afghan Delhi Sultanate established Persian as its official language, a policy continued by the Mughal Empire, which extended over most of northern South Asia from the 16th to 18th centuries and cemented Persian influence on the developing Hindustani. In cities such as Delhi, Khariboli began to acquire some Persian loanwords and continued to be called "Hindi" as well as "Urdu".[44][41]

>Paki reading comprehension
You literally disapproved your own post you retard. I never denied hindi had Persian loan words, but it still doesn't make it a Muslim language.

If some Hindus invades America and changed English into some new language with Sanskrit words so it would be easy for Hindus then I would call the new language a Hindu language
Exact same thing happened with Hindi.

Only Islamic language is Arabic since Allah sent Quran in Arabic. Persian is considered as language of muslim culture becan use Islamization of Turkics happened mostly through Iranians and not Arabs. Arabs were far away after their first invasion of Turkestan happened, so Islam kept being transferred through Persians. In the end Turkics worshiped Persian language because they considered it language close to Islam and Islamic society. So Turkics imposed same mentality when they ruled India.

>It was designed by the Muslim elite to be intelligible to Muslims

Well then they failed miserably, 99% of persians and arabs can barely understand bollywood songs, even urdu songs of 50's would be impossible for them to understand.

You are one hell of a retard, English has tons of loan words from romance languages yet it is still a germanic language.

Yes but it succeeded in its primary objective: to cuck Hindus.

No shit, I’m not talking about language families you mong.
Hindi is still an indo-Aryan language. Doesn’t mean it’s not Muslim.

Modern persian in itself is about 35-40% arabic derived. It's a heavily arabized language since arabic influence not just vocabulary but also grammar. This is not the case with urdu for instance, it borrows vocabulary from persian and arabic but its grammar shows almost no persian influence. This is why pakistanis will understand even modern bollywood songs (which use very little urdu compared to 50's) but not persians.

I disagree.
If Sankskrit words are added to the English language, it's still English, just with Hindu influence.

Your ancestors were the cucked Hindus lad.

How does it cuck hindus? Care to explain?

How the fuck is it a Muslim language when it's grammar, script and the majority of its vocabulary is derived from Sanskrit?

Allah sent the taurat in hebrew, and other texts in other languages. I’m sure Persian prophets received revelation in Persian

Persian grammar isn't based on Semitic languages. Semites have set of consonants between which they add different vowels in order to form 10-12 words from that set of consonants. That's not case in Persian.

Your ancestors were cucked by Hindus actually
Pic related
Literally all the Hindus during the mughal era were REEEing about language. They had to learn how to speak in ooga booga Sanskrit grammar and add all the Persian, Turkic and Arabic words just to talk to officials.

Attached: 98286186-03EC-4507-9AC4-998353F8D1B2.jpg (1280x913, 233K)

Yamnaya weren't dharma followers. Dharma was shaped from mixing Dravidian and Yamnaya customs for several generations, at least 3-4 centuries of mixing.

Now you making shit up, like I said before, just because Hindi has loan words from Persian and turkish doesn't make it a Muslim language, it's grammar, it's script and the majority of its vocabulary is derived from Sanskrit.

Sure but their religion was the ancestor to all modern Hindu beliefs

So what would i have to do to Sanskrit/khariboli to make it a Muslim language for you? Occupying the country that speaks it and making it almost an analytic language with a ton of Muslim loanwords designedly by and for Muslim isn’t enough?

How thick is your head? Hindi wasn't created by and for Muslims, and just because it has some loan words does not make it a Muslim language, hell even Slavic languages have Turkish loanwords, it doesn't make them Muslim languages.

Balkan Slavic languages still have most of their grammar and a negligible amount of Turkic words. Not a good comparison. Hindi is vulgar vulgar vulgar vulgar Sanskrit with Persian and Arabic words.
>Hindi wasn't created by and for Muslims
See

No retard, the Hindi grammar isn't even close to any Muslim language and 80% of hindi vocabulary is still derived from Sanskrit, even more in formal hindi. You are just going in circles here.

>No retard, the Hindi grammar isn't even close to any Muslim language
A. I didn’t say that
B. It isn’t even close to Sanskrit either, so what’s your point?
>80% of hindi vocabulary is still derived from Sanskrit
Yes but nobody uses the native words/speaks “formal Hindi”. When was the last time you heard someone use the native word for but, woman, mother, father, et cetera.

It is close to Sanskrit, if you have studied even a little bit of Sanskrit you would know that.
Even in the informal setting the amount of perso-arabic words aren't more than
20%.
>When was the last time you heard someone use the native word for but, woman, mother, father, et cetera.
All the fucking time, woman is mahila or nari, mother is Mata, father is pitta all of them derived from Sanskrit.

>it’s close to sanskrit
Than why can no Indian understand sanskrit
>woman
An Indian on here told me no one uses the native words and everyone uses the Arabic word for genitals.

>than
Then