Xrp! XRP! XRPPPP!!!

is this better

cnbc.com/2018/09/17/ripple-hints-cryptocurrency-product-xrapid-will-go-live-soon.html

your stupidity and memes arent going to save you dude.

Just bought 10k.

Wont miss the money if its gone BUT FUCK i want to see those stupid faces when they get proven wrong

Attached: IMG_20180913_204626.jpg (719x719, 152K)

>trusting Brad Garlichouse
>trusting the Jew ogre
>trusting a giu who owns 5% of all XRP to his name

THIS IS NOW A STELLAR THREAD

Attached: 1534514237261.jpg (500x246, 138K)

Attached: stellar token distribution 1.png (900x206, 21K)

Stellar leaves the chat

courts.ms.gov/index.php?cn=87490#dispArea

>how would The stellar development foundation, McCaleb or any of their partners be liable for this?

lmao poor cripples

You must be pretty upset about the chain partnership?

twitter.com/jesselund/status/1040032407636697088?s=09

Haha

Attached: Logo.png (225x225, 5K)

why would i be upset user?

Attached: comparison.png (1713x818, 527K)

Chain partnership... yeah what about their negative numbers they writing ;)

A dying horse aquires a salty waterpot

Gets him to die quicker.

How are the lawsuits in japan going?

Or how does the buttcoinerbatallion think about that JED hold 50k BTC ready to dump on the market?

>stellar "foundation"

Please try to tell me its non profit lmao lmao
LMAO IM DYING RIGHT NOW YOU BAGHOLDING FUCK HAHAHAHAHAHAA

Attached: 5a613b7b86a7a_Post3.thumb.png.27e8f66b7466430328049e659c92adb6.png (649x750, 414K)

>she actually included the unverified nodes that do nothing

lmao embarrassing pajeet

Attached: Itstime.jpg (350x200, 6K)

This is honestly sad. Your retort is "Chain is worthless" lmao

It's a non profit. Deal with it nigga.

Attached: Pushit.jpg (1920x1200, 90K)

>non profit
kek
the inflation lumens go right into their pockets user
900000000 lumens every year

Attached: stellar token distribution.png (1222x623, 85K)

R3 director said it. They ditched chain last year lmao.

Gtfo butthead.

Who are (they)? The SDF has a fund for operations. It's clearly marked.

Non profits can hold stock and collect capital gains you blithering faggot

Attached: wee.gif (611x900, 1.1M)

The same R3 that just assraped you in a settlement?

Attached: SereneStellar.png (161x196, 18K)

>Who are (they)?
the sdf founders
all their wallets and the wallets holding their partnerships' xlm, point to the inflation destination account to receive the xlm created for inflation distribution, provided below
>Account (SDF Inflation Destination) GDWNY2POLGK65VVKIH5KQSH7VWLKRTQ5M6ADLJAYC2UEHEBEARCZJWWI
and the lumens arriving to this adress go straight into their pockets

[citation needed]

Where is stripes inflation account?

Also wouldn't increasing the supply make the coins worth less? Yeah. Basic math pajeet.

How much is Brad paying you?

I love how desperate these bagholders are. I sold at 2.70 and never looked back.
XRP's volume is less than bCash, less than half EOS, and less than LTC.

XRP is dead fren

All minable coins have that problem too

Where is stripes inflation account?
you can search for it here
stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/XLM?filter=asset-holder
make sure to look for pic related
as i said before, all the lumens go right into that adress, and they dump from there

>Also wouldn't increasing the supply make the coins worth less? Yeah.
that's right, it decreases your lumens value as they sell their 900 million they get each year for free

Attached: inflation destination.png (560x42, 6K)

Smartest user in this /thread

Yeah well Bitcoin inflation is what; 1800 bitcoins a day get mined? Lol compared to 66billion to be dumped; that got created out of thin air? Only a brain let buys and holds xrp right now

Looks like the market doesnt give a shit

this.
imagine a "non profit foundation" dumping 900 million coins per year (that they get for free)
aside of the 96 billion coins they hold, yet to be dumped into the market, why would you buy this trash?

The escrow prevents them from dumping them quickly and doesn’t obligate them to dump what comes out of escrow either.

Miners have to sell to pay power bills

The "market" is about to assfuck everyone and is playing games as long as they can

Why xrp when liquid allows private btc transactions between exchanges, banks and wallet providers with 1 minute confirmation time? Bitcoin already has over 10x xrp's volume .

and what is going to increase the volume, brainlet?

banks using xrapid...

the tidal wave is coming

so why are banks signing up to use ripple and xrp when they can just use bitcoin instead?

>banks using xrapid
hahahaha
This meme is still alive?

you don't read enough to be relevant

Bitcoin users are paying millions of dollars per day to secure a useless blockchain. The amount of XRP that Ripple sells is a drop in the bucket compared to that. Who are the real brainlets?

Banks won't be using it. Ripple is committed to decentralization and no censorship. Banks won't play because that means sanctions busting and terror financing, unlike SWIFT which can be censored.

Ripple is so obsessed with knocking out BTC and LN that they've compromised their one advantage, regulatory capture, and will not get any institutions on board.

It's over.

>Sagar Sarbhai told CNBC that he is confident that commercial production will soon begin.
>Pajeet is confident in something
Sell

hahaha

amazing

the anti-ripple crew are seriously now jumping on the idea that xrp is going to be TOO decentralised?!

what a joke

you couldn't make this shit up

How do you take the news just posted in OP and get to > it's over

This is a cartoon world man... post has to be troll

because he's a fucking brainlet, that's how

really has to be

nobody could be that stupid

ripple are actively working with regulators, and have former regulators on their current staff, so there's no way they don't understand exactly what's going on and what they need to do

I'm not part of any "for or against crew", I'm just out for myself and making money. I bought XRP last year for 0.24 because I saw the dumb PR pump spend going on, and dumped it at just over 10x. Most of that news was "banks are going to use it / WU is testing it". So that fundamental is already burned out, and it won't move the market again (boy who cried wolf).

I've been following the project closely enough, and watched as Ripple went into a panic over LN. I talked to Schwartz who doubled down on their pursuit of decentralization in response to my very direct Q about SWIFT and Sanctions / Terror. They believe in some kind of twisted "Crypto Anarchy, but for Banks" vision, that isn't going to happen.
Again, xRapid is a shitcoin meant to serve the needs of Enterprise. It's problem will be regulatory compliance. The news of this moved the market last year, but it's become the boy who cried wolf.

for the record, i bought at 20 cents and sold at 15x return, but i've still bought back in for the rise that's coming with adoption

widespread adoption over the coming years is going to dwarf any other project

xRapid isn't XRP.

This is the thinking that ETH was going to moon b/c of CryptoKities.

Youre wrong on both of your claims for a number of reasons but mainly your mentality that any price movement after xrapid goes live is going to be primarily driven by "boy who cried wolf" speculators and not use case demand. Once xrapid goes live the entire paradigm around crypto will have changed.

>xRapid isn't XRP

this conversation is over

go and research the fundamentals

Xrapid uses XRP for liquidity though... and that means massive amounts of volume

Attached: 1524999650123.jpg (565x825, 58K)

>Once xrapid goes live the entire paradigm around crypto will have changed.

Attached: 07-minister.jpg (300x225, 10K)

>CryptoKitties uses ETH/Gas for transactions though... and that means massive amounts of volume

Attached: 1511997378027.jpg (1024x806, 85K)

You're making a false equivalence: the people that played cryptokitties weren't normies that didn't have any crypto and needed to go buy ETH just to play cryptokitties... it was a bunch of people that ALREADY HAD CRYPTO AND ETH TO BEGIN WITH. xRapid is bringing in volume that DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST.

Attached: 09-roll-safe.w710.h473.jpg (710x473, 53K)

you're comparing $30k a day of ETH volume to the potential for billions or even trillions from banks...?

damn, you stupid

Attached: lol.jpg (1080x373, 86K)

I'm using CryptoKitties as the most absurd thing about the whole ETH market token market. Most ETH action was ICO's. That WAS bringing in lots of normies, and they were buying ETH on Coinbase (normie central).
Banks won't use it, or risk US Treasury sanctions, so at best you'll have Iran and Russia and other global pariahs sign up. Even mainstream remittance companies haven't signed on, the one who have are well, pic related.

Attached: literally-who.png (355x253, 7K)

your lack of patience and understanding is going to cost you a lot of money

How so? I'm not shorting XRP, so I've got no monetary risk to XRP doing anything. I pumped it and dumped it like the cheap slut it is.

stay ignorant

Attached: rbc.jpg (777x926, 126K)

Hey, if things change, and Schwartz told me, turns out to be false, then I'd change my position. As of now, I'm trusting one of the directors over some autism spinner fanatic on an anime board.

if you're citing decentralisation as a reason for XRP failing then you're insane

bye!

Don't drink too much tonight crazy wine lady.

>I'm using CryptoKitties as the most absurd thing about the whole ETH market token market. Most ETH action was ICO's. That WAS bringing in lots of normies, and they were buying ETH on Coinbase (normie central).

At this point you're just propping up straw men. When I point out cryptokitties is a false equivalence you now claim you're using it because its absurd and pivot to claiming ICOs are the equivalent. Which is also absurd because normies that werent already involved in crypto weren't buying ETH to buy ICOS. Coinbase has buy limits of something like $100 a week for new users, that fact alone blows your nonsense argument out of the water.

>Banks won't use it, or risk US Treasury sanctions
ripple.com/insights/federal-reserve-task-force-ripple-improves-speed-transparency-global-payments/

I'm done trying to convince you user. Just remember in five years when you're still poor and thinking "I wish I'd bought XRP..." that I tried to warn you.

Attached: IMG_1494.gif (205x211, 1.17M)

>cripple

> global pariahs

Even if this were true, Russia and Iran both have robust banking systems thay would pour in billions.

But it isn't true. I can pretty confidently name some of the initial banks going live... Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand), Kakao Bank (Korea), SBI Sumishin Bank (Japan), National Bank of Abu Dhabi (UAE), Santander (Spain).. then probably half the banks in Turkey , Argentina, Brazil... then Barclays, then Bank of America, then central banks. But keep on believing what you want.

>that fact alone blows your nonsense argument out of the water.
xRapid is a settlement layer using XRP right? My expectation is similar performance with less enthusiasm since there are multiple currencies you can issue a security on top of.

>ripple.com/insights/federal-reserve-task-force-ripple-improves-speed-transparency-global-payments/
News from 2017, it moved the market, and I bought and dumped on it. It was fun.

I wonder why banks haven't fully embraced it?

>Just remember in five years when you're still poor and thinking "I wish I'd bought XRP..." that I tried to warn you.

If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP, you'd be FUD'ing it into the dirt right now to buy it at $0.01 each. In reality, your $2 bags are probably heavy as fuck.

> If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP

... this isnt a thought kid it is an absolute fact. wtf is wrong with you, what are you trying to do here, youre just fucking with us right, good one you got me for a minute

Copy paste list from Let's dig in there. Just throwing names around isn't good enough to buy on.
>Santander
Santander produced the "One Pay FX" app.
It has 16 reviews on the iTunes store, the top one looks like an XRP booster who wants them to "add crypto" to it, which isn't even the point of the app, it's to send Euro's and USD.

itunes.apple.com/us/app/one-pay-fx/id1363143795?mt=8

News of One Pay FX goes out on April 12th, 2018.
XRP price on 11/4/18: $0.49
XRP price today: $0.27

Something tells me that One Pay FX by Santander partnered with Ripple isn't having a positive effect on XRP.

then you should be doing your level best to crash the price of XRP to buy in at a deep discount.

You ever read about the Rothschilds and the Battle of Waterloo?

Im not talking about one pay fx. Im talking about xrapid live production. And im not responding here anymore.

The Santander citation from the list is One Pay FX. That is what they built! You have to test the market impacts of these 'partnerships', obviously, didn't work! The hype did from the initial press release, which was good for a pump and dump, but when the rubber met the road, it was a non event.

Why shouldn't I expect similar performance from the same asset? Next hype press release, and a massive let down?

>I wonder why banks haven't fully embraced it?
Because the Fed hasn't chosen which of the 13 (or so, I dont remember the exact number) option they are going with yet .... if you bother to look into all the other options on the table though ripple is the obvious winner, everything else is antiquated tech.... By 2020 the Fed should announce and anybody with half a brain knows the obvious choice is going to be Ripple.

>If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP, you'd be FUD'ing it into the dirt right now to buy it at $0.01 each. In reality, your $2 bags are probably heavy as fuck.

I bought at $0.17 dude.

If you took profits at $2+ and bought back in today, you'd be up substantially with more XRP. Holding all the way down like this is dumb.

The price has gone low enough goyjew. If this news is correct it means your running out of time to get it any lower regardless of market makers so you may as well buy now.

I won't be happy until it gives the entire rally back adjusted for inflation. ($0.19)

>If you took profits at $2+ and bought back in today, you'd be up substantially with more XRP. Holding all the way down like this is dumb.

thanks captain hindsight

if you sold at $2 and it went to $20 and you bought back you'd have 1/10th as well

Staying in over 10x is retarded.
Don't take advice from people who don't know this.
See I can buy back in now with my 90k after taxes, while this guy is still up on paper, but holding an asset that is dropping.

>Staying in over 10x is retarded.

Been holding since BTC was $1

Guess I'm retarded huh

0.01$ EOY

Attached: DQmbyCZoWtZbZs821QAGcmeexc7rETqKqBtzTeLsJvv7Drv.jpg (500x405, 51K)

>0.01$ EOY
$1 EOY

Did you take profits to get to no risk after it went past 10x?
It's risk averaging numbnuts.

yea man if you didnt sell at exactly 19,994 then you're a fucking idiot

checked and repilled

>Did you take profits to get to no risk after it went past 10x?
>It's risk averaging numbnuts.
Did I take $2k out of my literally enormous holdings? Yeah but not at 10x like a fucking retard at light 1000x

95% of Bitcoin isn't owned by top 100 wallets like XRP.

Only 14% BTC is owned by top 100.

You gotta be retarded to think the original crypto that has been around for 10 years and had to be mined has the same distribution as a token where pretty much everything was rewarded to the founders.

Attached: scam.jpg (291x173, 7K)

>95% of Bitcoin isn't owned by top 100 wallets like XRP.
>Only 14% BTC is owned by top 100.

97% of BTC is owned by 4% of addresses

No one knows how many addresses belong to each person. 100 people could own that 97% for all you know.

It's actually 37.6% for XRP. A high percentage of that is in escrow and can't be dumped. Much more certainty than BTC.

> 97% of BTC is owned by 4% of addresses

This is close to true but it's also true that a fucking idiot. There are 22 Million BTC addresses created in 10 years. So yeah, a small percentage of active addresses own the majority of BTC.

> If you hold 1 or more BTC or more, then you are also in the top 3% of addresses that owns 96% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .1 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 11% of addresses that owns 99.1% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .01 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 30% of addresses that owns 99.87% of Bitcoin

100 Top addresses, however, own only 14% of BTC

1500 Top addresses only only 35% of BTC

On the other hand, top 100 addresses own 80% of XRP in circulation and Ripple pretty much owns all the XRP that aren't in circulation -- effectively 100 addresses own 95% of the supply

Attached: dump.jpg (500x634, 46K)

Creating new addresses and wallets with BTC is also trivial. I did some work anonymously for another anonymous person the other day, and created a new wallet for the tx.
XRP you have to pay (cuck) for a wallet, so it's done less often.

> 85% of XRP is owned by top 100 wallets counting exchanges

ledger.exposed/rich-stats

> About 21% of BTC is owned by top 100 wallets counting exchanges

bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

> XRP can't be dumped...more certainty than BTC MUH

That's why there it dumped 93% from ATH?

That's why you have wallets like this that dumped ONE BILLION XRP in Jan/Feb?

bithomp.com/explorer/rDahLhHJaowRYn4hRkS9S2YpAeiTR8mjBF

Attached: fomo3.gif (400x246, 1.95M)

CHAINLINK IS SO MUCH BETTER LOOK HOW DISTRIBUTED THE FUNDS ARE

Attached: 100.png (949x456, 80K)

Click the 'Existing XRP' option on that site which shows 37.64%. Either way, it's not close to your 95% lie.

I didn't say XRP can't be dumped you fucktard. Stop misquoting me.

There are more whales in BTC and they are complete wildcards. The dumping will continue for a very long time while XRP's biggest whale just sold everything.

And lets not forget that the only thing those buying bitcorn have accomplished it to ship billions of dollars to mining pools and electric companies. There is so much more money being sucked out of the bitcorn ecosystem for absolutely no gain that complaining about XRP is absurd.

I swear XRP holders are fucking retarded

> Site shows 80.26 % of XRP (37,634,018,878 ) in CIRCULATION is held by top 100 wallets

SUM(Non-escrowed XRP Top 100 accounts) / SUM(Non-escrowed XRP accounts) * 100

> Site also shows 37.64 % of XRP in EXISTENCE is held by top 100 wallets

SUM(Non-escrowed XRP Top 100 accounts) / SUM(Existing XRP on ledger) * 100

But in the 2nd calculation for EXISTENCE counts the funds in escrow as not being owned by anyone which is blatantly false. ~The 60 Billion in ESCROW are XRP is owned by Ripple - they get to sell it.

Escrow or not Ripple still owns that XRP.

37,634,018,878 + 60 Billion in Escrow is owned by the top 100 holders

97.6 billion out of 100 Billion is owned by the top 100 holders

Attached: David_Schwartz.jpg (900x1200, 190K)

(((Ripple)))

lol this dumbfuck didn't request any XRP. He owns 2% of Ripple and gets a token salary. What a brainlet

Spends most of his time on Twitter. Loser.

Attached: Ripple-Cryptographer-David-Schwartz-About-Malleability-In-Bitcoin-YouTube-450x270.png (450x270, 132K)

Funds in escrow count as accounts too. You can't just add them together. And like I said before, if it's in escrow it can't be sold. But go ahead, keep changing your numbers on the fly.