Gamedex partners with Chainlink:

Lol, again?

>pokemin cards on blockchain
quality partnerships there

Look up what MtGox stands for, lmao.

small fish are also fish, filling the pond

MtGox doesn't have a good opinion

It's where Bitcoin got its first big break.

Pokemon cards is still a huge business and very well connected troughout the world.

how is it connected to pikemon besides the domain being repurposed?

>he didn't look up what MtGox stands for

nothing on the scale that was implied for the project. It's a charity partnership by Sergey to prop up some small, well intentioned project,

this
haters gonna hate because their pathetic shitcoins will never be used for anything

Attached: 1500761590187.jpg (409x409, 45K)

>nothing on the scale that was implied for the project
What?

You are what you associate with. If you keep with small time, no name projects, you are likely one as well.

swift?

So ETH is a small-time, no-name project?

So because of Swift's involvement, no other projects can use Chainlink?

Also, I saw a poor person shopping at Walmart. Does that mean Walmart is run by poor people?

Eth doesn't really do partnerships besides the pones that re well estimed, even if controversial - like omisego.
Pokemon trading on the blockchain is shitpost level partnership.

If walmart decides to treat that hobo as an official, unirotnical, business partner than it's a sure sign of the company going to the ground. Like it already is said to be going exactly due to horrible people shopping there.

ETH has spawned literally hundreds of shitty projects, you know that right?

So does Chainlink treat Gamedex as a full-blown partner?

Network Usage =value = lambos

Attached: 1536731212054.jpg (781x767, 108K)

If a woman sleeps with a dirty homeless person, she is a worthless whore. This is similar. No amount of rich chad semen can redeem her

The point of eth is that those shitty projects aren't partnerships at all. It's a part of something everyone can do without Vitaliks permission.
Don't think you understand eth.

>being an erc token means your shitcoin is big time big name project
lmao

So what about ETH, which has given birth to the children of hundreds of homeless people?

Same with Chainlink.
It's a decentralized network, anyone can use it.

Where did I say that?
There are many erc tokens that are literal scams.

Its gonna be used for fantasy football, nfl, hockey etc etc that need real-time data with a shit load of regular api calls every gameday. Not just pokeymans.
>bullish

Attached: 1534921698907.gif (480x202, 3.22M)

partnership = customer/user
stay mad filthy no linker, I see faggots like you desperately trying to fud because deep down you know you fucked up but you're too proud to buy now and good, I hope you never buy, I want you to suffer in the future

Attached: nolinker syndrome.jpg (701x517, 116K)

Yeah, like chainlink

There's a difference in endorsing and allowing something to live at all. You tolerate insects, you don't treat them as something worthy on a 'inter-animal' level

Likely not, because some really high-profile parties have been direclty involved in the project, like Swift.

>partnership = customer/user
not in a decentralized, trustless environment. That's the whole point of this thing ffs

Did Chainlink endorse Gamedex?

And even if they did, why not help out one of the first prospective users of your product?

>pokemon cards on the blockchain
>chainlink considers itself a peer with this

Attached: laughing-hyena-photo.jpg (545x582, 65K)

What?
Are you sayiong partnerships are the same as customers/users in a decentralized, trustless environment?

They can help, that's no problem. In a similar manner like you give a quarter to a hobo. Endorsement is different.

Endorsement can be a form of help.

Also, did Chainlink endorse Gamedex?

They didn't, did they? And you're just an idiot talking out of your ass?

Can be, but isn't within the context we are operating in.
Acceptance of endorsement from an external project is endorsement by chainlink. this was made semi-official some time ago.

>isn't within the context we are operating in.
Of course it is.
If nothing else, it's exposure.

>Acceptance of endorsement from an external project is endorsement by chainlink.
So ETH endorsed every single shitty project that shat out an erc token?
Got it.

Attached: 1536046208580.jpg (992x1402, 407K)

gamedex is a shit ico cashgrab not even in presale yet tho?

why the fuss?

>word twisting
changing the definition of words established in the discussion doesn't make your assertions correct.

No words were twisted.

Can you make Sergey and Rory cards? This has potential.

Sure thing sweety

LINK collectibles on the blockchain when?

Attached: 1518852198271.png (644x704, 74K)

I think shitting on these "literal-who's" while at the same time believing in memetics is a tad bit schizophrenic.

Imagine trying this hard.

did not get that. care to repeat?

He's a fudding nolinker. Fuck him. Not selling, $1000 EOY

wait THAT'S what chainlink does? fuck why didn't you guys tell me this