>#Bitcoin will lose 50% of its #cryptocurrency market share to #ETH within 5 years, due to it offering more uses and being backed with superior #blockchain technology. We completely agree – unlike #BTC, which is a one-trick pony, the limit of ETH’s application is sky itself.
Ether & Ethereum platform won forever
Angel Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
sifrdata.com
twitter.com
Joshua Flores
eth isnt secure
bitcoin is
Ryan Gray
Lmao
Gabriel Russell
Nigger monkey
Aiden Smith
>Weiss Ratings
Ryder Hernandez
>not realizing sentiment is based in a logical thought process
>the source is always wrong if I didn't like the source at some point in time
Juan Moore
Nobody gives a shit about fundamental security. They will not give a shit about the currencies until something forces them to, nobody will ever be forced to use Bit Coins on any scale that matters.
Landon Cook
*Bitcoin(BCH)
Samuel Martinez
They are both vaporwave
Aaron Clark
with so much fighting in between projects, nobody will win in the short term. Bitcoin maximalists will not abandon Bitcoin for ETH in case Bitcoin goes down. ETH maximalists (do they exist, kek?) will not abandon ETH for BTC. Meanwhile all people who joined the stage in 2017 will jump off the ship. Everyone watching will turn around their heads and pretend Crypto never happened. A quiet period for maybe 2-3 years and then suddenly a repetition of 2017 and Crypto will be the hottest shit under the sun. No matter if you are in BTC or ETH you'll have another attempt at making it. You fuck that up and well, you'll have to wait for the next cycle.
Parker Edwards
btc will be the largest smart contract platform. there will never be a maximalist/core brain drain to eth. they would go to ltc/monero/tari
Jacob Ross
bitcoin maximalists are irrelevant. They already hodl, they will go down with the ship and that's going to be it.
Benjamin Reyes
on a completely unrelated note, you shouldn't mix the two semantics of the literary device that is the greentext.
As a side note to that, given that merkle trees (blockchains), eliptic curve signature and proof of work are from the 70s, 80s abd 90s respectively, and the smart contract were conceptualized in the 90s already, and so given that Nakamotos cobtributiob was "only" the clever combination of the above, I'd unironically argue that the greentext is the heavier weighting contribution to modernity. I.e. greentext as literary device is more interesting than bitcoin is for economy
Jack Baker
>narcissistic injury, the post
Nathan Clark
>that one intolerable unable to take a side and squeaks, "Actually, they are both incorrect."
One side is correct here, and that's the general purpose platform. Nobody wants to adopt a defined BTC. They will create their own purposeful technology.
NPCs will be rejected from all history books, left borderline hysterical in the wake of a wondrous new dawn. Take comfort in your fellow nigger.
Easton Cooper
The asymmetry however will fuck the other side. If one side is incorrect and one pulls out and crashes so will the other. Talking about correlations, in terms of price correlation is too strong. There is no scenario where either ETH or BTC comes out ahead as sole winner without first decimating the other side and with it itself.
Elijah Diaz
The fucking jooz wants your shekels before etf is confirmed. Don't fall for it
Adrian Williams
you're completely wrong, the flippening will be the greatest crypto fomo in history.
NPCs literally think that bitcoin is always going to be the first because it's the first. The moment it's the second they will think it's shit and sell it all for ethereum.
Connor Hernandez
If Bitcoin drops by another 50%, then ETH will drop by even more. We'll be in double digits ETH and I am not sure who will FOMO at such a grim scenario except the people who already spend all their days obsessed about Crypto. The flippening may be a lot more depressing than it sounds user.
Cooper Ross
>sky itself is the limit
the gaslimit per transaction is the limit. And a very severe one.
Oliver Campbell
>If Bitcoin drops by another 50%, then ETH will drop by even more
No, no. There's almost no long-term correlation. BTC was lower in June, but eth was much higher. BTC has close to zero impact on eth price. Their cycles are almost entirely independent.
The last time it was, was in January when people were massively selling btc to buy eth - because btc was dropping and eth was rising! An exact opposite of what you wrote.
Cameron Diaz
out of all currencies ETH still has some the highest BTC correlation.
> sifrdata.com
It is slipping yes, but not by much.
Joshua Perry
Bitcoin is never going to be toppled as much as I would like It to be
Daniel Collins
Those are daily correlations of percentages. It's entirely possible for long-term results to be uncorrelated, but heavily correlated in the short-term. That's the case here. It's a very common statistical trap to fall into.
Consider two assets: A and B
When A falls -0.1% B falls -1%
when A rises 5% B rises +0.5%
The correlation between the two is going to be >0.9.
Yet in the long run A is going to be astronomically higher than B, and long-term results are correlated barely above noise
Luis Flores
or from a more abstract view, correlations are good descriptions of additive processes (ie. increases/decreases are added over long-term), but daily returns are part of a multiplicative process (daily percentage changes are multiplied by each other).
Ethan King
what makes eth not secure?
on pure mining difficulty, sure eth is slightly easier to 51% attack (but not still possible using btc asics)