Why can't women understand the concept of nation, patriotism, loyalty?

Why can't women understand the concept of nation, patriotism, loyalty?

Why are they so bland, and ultimately all their interests (cosmetics, clothes, tv shows) revolve around Chad's cock?

Attached: 1555857858017.gif (909x890, 501K)

Other urls found in this thread:

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/the-highlight/2019/8/7/20746147/congress-women-2019-gender-parity
youtube.com/watch?v=bKB1USWjfjY
economicshelp.org/blog/274/uk-economy/economic-impact-of-margaret-thatcher/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Your mysoginy is pretty fucking disgusting, bro.

Because women are Unique and Egopilled while m*Noids are Cringe and Spookpilled.

stop projecting incel. Just because you haven't talked to a woman in months doesn't mean you can go around making assumptions about us

>Why can't women understand the concept of nation, patriotism, loyalty?

Attached: 1557257242731.png (647x740, 167K)

>Ad personam
As expected from seething roasties.

Why can't women engage in argument without attacking their opponent?

FYI: what I have stated is objective fact. Women are statistically LESS involved with patriotic events, as well as politics. There are barely any female politicians, and most of them are members of left-wing, multicultural parties. There were few great female politicians, such as Margaret Thatcher and Catherine the Great, but those were exceptions. Vast majority of women do not give two fucks about well being of their country, and their main interest is seducing the most attractive male for purpose of having sex.

Attached: 1556121274906.png (604x630, 353K)

the collective of the nation preserves oneself

I'm not a woman.

Attached: musculoso.jpg (1995x2636, 693K)

Aren't you a little old for ghost-stories, kiddo?

>There were few great female politicians, such as Margaret Thatcher

Attached: 1556851681259.jpg (1080x1020, 72K)

Evolutionary survival/success
what’s the point in loyalty when they can hang around at the finish line and fuck the winner

>There were few great female politicians, such as Margaret Thatcher

Attached: 1345659072002.png (667x670, 386K)

Patriotism is a bourgeois lie though.

Cope more
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

My point still stands.

When I was in high school, me and my male friends enjoyed long discussions about history and politics.

Meanwhile, out female classmates were more interested in creating rankings of the most attractive boys in the class, literally.

Is that coincidence?

Thatcher literally saved British economy.

>Women are statistically LESS involved with patriotic events, as well as politics

Attached: reaction do you have a single fact to back that up.jpg (207x253, 17K)

>Why can't women understand the concept of nation, patriotism, loyalty?
Because those things are only in the way of getting impregnated and raising your off-spring in safety. All of their biological instincts work against the development of loyalty to any group.

Its not their fault, nature made them sluts.

have sex

Because when given equal rights, women become enemy of the man as much as Jews.

Attached: CatoMeme.jpg (640x820, 127K)

The average guy doesn’t give a fuck either.

Have sex, incel

I'm not downloading your kiddie porn virus, Padraig

Attached: 1530201143280.jpg (555x394, 31K)

>When I was in high school, me and my male friends enjoyed long discussions about history and politics.
>Thatcher literally saved British economy.

Attached: piotr and his friends.png (1066x600, 276K)

Only think women really care about is sex. In movies, men are the horny ones, but in reality, the oposite is true. Compare monasteries to nuneties, reletively few monks ever leave and plenty of those that do become priests and keep the celibacy, while barely any nun lasts over three years and almost all that leave are soon married.

Because nearly every man lives for them and to stick their dick in a hole
Fucking beta cucks

Ah yes, because as we all know, the bourgeoisie just love it when native workers have a greater share of national income than capital

>filename

thatcher didn't do shit
neoliberal economical policies have ruined this country

There you go

google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/the-highlight/2019/8/7/20746147/congress-women-2019-gender-parity

>For every woman across both chambers, there are roughly three men

Because they dont have to fight for the country, by nature. Their lives are meant to be fully controlled by men.
But the jewish propaganda forced the families apart.
Feminism and communism destabilized the economies and destroyed the family unit by having the women go to work instead of staying home and taking care of the children.
Now, the disorganized, familyless population is easy to control through media manipulation and controlled political movements/organizations.

Attached: 1569025803941.jpg (720x540, 41K)

>while barely any nun lasts over three years and almost all that leave are soon married
Interesting. Do you have any sources on that matter?

Seethe more, roasties

Attached: 1565895907535.jpg (728x899, 84K)

Based

Attached: 1473572519615.png (1500x3719, 595K)

I do not þink common knowledge needs sources.

>fighting and dying for your country is based and redpilled
>but also leaving your home to fight and die in wars force women to do men's work which isn't based and redpilled and jewish plot

Attached: 7878.png (211x239, 4K)

Jow Forums incel autism has no logic

Nobody is talking about going to war and dying, you dumb sluts, stop setting up a strawman.

It's about at least taking INTEREST in your country's well being, knowing its history, trying to improve it.

Even such simple things exceed mental capacities of women.

>revolve around Chad's cock
I doubt Chad likes rainbow eye shadow and watching Terrace House.

Women try to get a Chad like men try to get a Stacey. Nothing new. Unless you want to imply you don't care about the looks of a woman as long as she's patriotic.

My point is, this is literally the only thing most of women care about.

You're almost like a woman.
Small and fragile.
Bend over white boy

>Most men marry a non-working pet-like woman
What could go wrong?

>conflating free market ascendancy with leftism
However wrote this shit is a retard. Conservatives deny class dynamics precisely because they put the individual as an atomized unit and the hand of the free market above all. This comical unseen benevolent force being their substitute for god.
>blood and soil
If that were the case conservatives would immediately have to reject any notion of right of conquest. One of the few consistent beliefs they have. No instead they place subjugation by militarism or market forces above even that in every policy they craft and every decision they have ever taken.

Attached: 1525020700903.jpg (611x616, 59K)

>It's about at least taking INTEREST in your country's well being
>praise neoliberals

Attached: 1528986123431.jpg (471x400, 119K)

in western countries, there are more young men than young women because there hasn't been any wars in those regions lately
that's why you see the increase in prostitution, homosexuality, pornography and degeneracy - because there aren't enough women to go around
even after wars, the male population always recovers, because more boys are born and male children are generally healthier
men are meant by nature to work and fight for their family, and compete with other men for women, resources and territory

Why do nazis always think in terms of false dichotomies?

The problem with the women is that the status quo brainwashes them into being sex objects. The ones who don't sexualise themselves in the most obvious manner and don't fall for the sexualising trends are cast out and it's common courtesy that women are more subject to what society thinks, so they more or less are tacitly compelled to turn to sex objects.

I'm glad I'm a man. Add to this that Romania is a shithole and feminism doesn't have any clout here.

Bloody backward ethnics make video like this in Romania and every whitey fawns over this kind of behaviour.

youtube.com/watch?v=bKB1USWjfjY

>patriotism

Attached: 1468726665808.jpg (200x192, 4K)

>white knights ITT

Attached: 389FB7AB-3CB6-47AC-B1EF-DBE5DAD7EDC4.gif (498x498, 1.28M)

woman don't exist

Attached: 1563561216414.jpg (753x1160, 95K)

Attached: 1564706456008.jpg (800x450, 232K)

Patriotism means the president's son goes to study in France and England while his conscription papers are being forged. Meanwhile they both, the president and his spawn, post patriotic twaddle on twitter/tv as farmers' sons are being taken into an army barracks on their last day of high school.

because they are biologically programmed to follow their men, so if the men are loyal to the country, so are the women. What the problem comes down to is the lack of patriotism of the modern man and emancipation (which denies loyalty of women for men)

If my country gave a shit about me then I'd give a shit about my country.

Sounds like a dog

Anecdotal as fuck. There are also boys who only talk about retarded normie video games and rank girls only, while other girls debate politics.
Most of the men also care about shagging Stacey, among many other things with which they fill their time. Same for women.

what a stupid opinion

>Thatcher literally saved British economy.
Every economic and social problem England has in the present day can directly be laid at the feet of thatcherism.

cuz they are stupid concepts

>Make everything so females become the sexual selectors
>Behave like a beta moron, keeping them like pets after begging them to
Huh

Thatcher was literally the best British PM of 2nd half of XXth century, prove me wrong.

>Saved Falklands
>BTFO unprofitable mining business
>Liberalize and save British economy

economicshelp.org/blog/274/uk-economy/economic-impact-of-margaret-thatcher/

Yes user, we definitely need wars wiping out entire generations of young men because of porn and gays

Another alt-right incel.
Nobody care in civilized world about this useless issues

thats literally me

because women who were loyal to their tribe, were killed

Again, patriotism is not about war, or being a cuck to a government. It's about seeing your compatriots as a big community, and trying to improve its general well being - even by doing simple things. It's about taking interest in its history and culture, preserving them, and helping them to thrieve. See

Because all women are retarded

Because these things do not matter as much as you believe them to.

How often do you interact with women?

See

>Only think women really care about is sex
Wew

Why can't men understand the concept of sensitivity, beauty and gentleness?

Why are they so aggressive, and ultimately all their interests (bodybuilding, porn, guns) revolve around Stacy's vagina?

1) We reject "class dynamics" because it is a concept based on the labor theory of value, which is false. We consider the family to be an economic unit, not the individual (which is a liberal idea).
Healthy competition is not a God, but a driving force of progress and civilization. Only liberals and communists substitute God with their false beliefs of benevolent forces of common (state) ownership.
2) Nobody expects a canadian to understand the concept of a nation. You do not have a nation or a culture, you only have a leaf.

Attached: CzZ02xnXAAA2jRi.jpg (559x557, 76K)

Seems pretty self-crippling. Why should I reduce the scope of my learning to just the knowledge contained within my borders? Why should I limit my impact, if it is positive, to just a single nation? It sounds as if those options exceed your own mental capacities and as a result you wish for everyone to play along within your small conception of the world and man at large in it.

Attached: p01j2f3n.jpg (640x360, 28K)

because that would make you a faggot that woman don't want to date.

>We consider the family to be an economic unit, not the individual
Which is demonstrably false. What the science of production shows us is that individuals within the larger identifiable classes shape society.Thus both conservatives and liberals are wrong.
>Healthy competition is not God
And yet the whole of conservative society is ordained upon the wills of the market and all its woes attributed to opposing it.
>driving force of progress and civilization
Even you yourself cannot stop to do anything but castigate yourself at its feet even as it tears apart what you claim to hold dear.

>Why are they so aggressive
It’s a trait that I find both hot and scary. There’s a fine line between their aggressiveness being kinda hot and making them out to be monsters.

Define beauty. If you mean aesthetics in the academic sense, I probably know more about those than most women ever will.

Because to those same morons, those are "gay" things
One of the many reasons mankind can't evolve

>Why should I reduce the scope of my learning to just the knowledge contained within my borders? Why should I limit my impact, if it is positive, to just a single nation?

When did I ever state that you should limit yourself to those concepts?

Problem is, vast majority of women don't even know the history of their own country - not to even mention the history of other countries. So even such a simple thing as possessing a knowledge of who they are, and where are they heading, would be a huge step forward for society as a whole.

The society that knows its own history is much harder to manipulate.

And answering your other question - the same reason why you'd only help your own family members, not every stranger you meet on the street. Because - simply - you can't. Nations have opposing interests, and that's a natural thing. It doesn't matter that you have to be xenophobic, by any means - but rather that you should seek to help and preserve your own "family". Tribalism is simply in human nature.

being ready to defend your country makes war less likely

>who they are
You seem to me to be someone who seeks to rob people of their own conception of self.
>where they are heading
Once again it seems to me that you are not content to let people dissent or opt out.
>you should help your own family
Why not help those in need instead? Surely even if you place your family above all once they reach a certain level of comfort it becomes time to look outwardly.
>opposing interest
Humans also have the capacity for dialogue and compromise.
>tribalism is human nature
An appeal to nature is hilarious considering the structure of your life in contrast with the natural world.

Statistically men DO have much more valuable interests than women. Even intelligent women tend to be bland as fuck. That's a simple fact.

Of course, I don't claim that men aren't interested in sex. But rather, that women have no real interests aside from it.

See and

This is why Canada has no culture

It wasn't an actual question, you fucking imbeciles.
It was a way to display the stupidity of stereotyping an entire fucking gender made up by billions of individuals with different lived experiences, opinions and sensibilities.
To you and : try conversing with an irl woman some time.

>You are all generalizing
>I talked to some women, therefore all of them are like those, talk to them you idiots
Amazing logic, hypocrite

>A girl
Yikes, stay away from me, femcel

Attached: pepe.jpg (474x305, 17K)

HEY! No one calls me an imbecile. apologize pls

It is amusing to see the extent of blindness induced by Marxism. A bizarre sight, to say the least.
>What the science of production shows us is that individuals within the larger identifiable classes shape society
I'm gonna need a source for that. If "the science of production" you refer to is Marx, please explain how the labor theory of value even remotely makes sense.
>And yet the whole of conservative society is ordained upon the wills of the market and all its woes attributed to opposing it.
There are no "wills of the market". There are things people want, there are things people have to offer. The market is not a sentient being, you only choose to anthropomorphize it because you have trouble understanding what it is - a basic, simple freedom to exchange goods and services.
>as it tears apart what you claim to hold dear
How can free exchange of goods and services can do any damage to what I love?
The only ones tearing apart what I hold dear are feminists, liberals and communists. You reject the nation, the family, and the very concept of freedom and independence, and infect others with your mind AIDS.

Attached: shiggy.jpg (700x700, 247K)

>I talked to some women, therefore all of them are like those, talk to them you idiots
I didn't say anything like that. Are you legitimately illiterate or something?

Sorry Aussiebro, that maybe was a bit harsh haha

>You seem to me to be someone who seeks to rob people of their own conception of self
>Once again it seems to me that you are not content to let people dissent or opt out.

How does knowing your history robs you of your own conception of self? Your argument makes no sense. You are literally claiming that posessing knowledge is something damaging.

>Why not help those in need instead?
Where did I ever say that you should't?
Of course, you are free to do it, if you want to. It doesn't change what I said earlier: that you should place your family first, and that you simply aren't able to physically help everyone.

>Humans also have the capacity for dialogue and compromise.
Of course they do, but it's naive to think that you can solve everything in a way of dialogue and compromise, especially in terms of geopolitics. Let's take Ukrainian-Russian conflict for example, or Pakistani-Indian. Attending this board, you should be well aware of that.

>An appeal to nature is hilarious considering the structure of your life in contrast with the natural world.

Elaborate, what did you mean by that?

>You reject the nation, the family, and the very concept of freedom and independence,
The market rejects all of the above in its pursuit of profit. Do you attribute globalism to Marx or Communism? Do not make me laugh.
>There are no "wills of the market"
Are you joking with me right now? That term comes from the most pro-market schools of economics on earth. The will of the market is anything that increases its scope and size.

Attached: Edmonton_RedSmog_2019.jpg (1075x555, 84K)

short answer is women are mentally children and need men for guidance. 99% of them dont grow past the development of high school to early college. Its not their fault they can't understand patriotism, like stated they were biologically molded over time to act that way. women truly aren't the problem, they are more of the catalyst through which the decline of values happen. the real problem is the erosion of these values in men like states and also the cancerous welfare state. if men tomorrow all decided to be disband the welfare state and all turned "right wing" we'd see an immediate change. of course the women would bitch and screech to high hell but within a few months they'd all become docile and follow along when they saw that this wasn't just a fleeting prank but the new norm.

Attached: AP410919056-300x195.jpg (300x195, 24K)

Based Italian-friend. Don't ever srop believing in the dream. Pass your values onto your children, that one day our descendents might learn where their ancestors failed.

>Confirming it's basically pets

I've already answered to your post here but you didn't even bother to reply.

In addition to your "hurr talk to actual women" argument: I've talked to many. And I know a LOT of intelligent women.

Problem is, even those don't really use the potential of their intellect for anything else than their professional work. Instead of - let's say - at least trying to understand the history politics of their country (I'm not saying engage in it. Just try to understand it), the'd rather pursue the hedonistic lifestyle. Instead of reading books - they'd rather watch dumb Americans tv series.

I'm 99% sure that even here, on Jow Forums, most of females rather dwell in threads about cute cats and hot men than the ones about history and culture of other countries.

It's really something that staggers me.

women can only win a fight by shunning he opposition. that is in their nature. they can't go into a debate without destroying the image of the opponent. because they know that destroing the image of the opposition makes people less likely to belive on them. that does stop working when people stop giving a fuck about their image and stand on their ground.

Also women, by nature, are parasites. they can only survive by manipulating and taken advantage of other people (most likely men). because they know they can't win in friction war nor with logical arguments. thus, they didn't developed the sense of nation, patriotism and loyalty. because to have these ideals, you need to have fight experience instead of playing the pussy card and getting everything you want. that is also the reason women hate anything that makes men happy that doesn't involve direct contact with them.
tl;dr: it is in their genes

have sex

>Why can't women understand spooks

why should they?

>How does knowing your history robs you of your own conception of self?
You can know something. But does that imply you are slavishly tied to what you have learned? That is the distinction I am making.
>you should place your familty first
But surely you agree that one should have the choice of whether or not to actually do so?
>naive
I do not think it is naive at all, without diplomacy this earth would have been a barren desert by 1952.
>elaborate
Appealing to nature is a fallacy especially in the context that humans have been bucking human nature and animal instinct in the way in which they live their lives since the establishment of the first permanent settlements. Considering how our conception of it has been radically different every 100-500 years or so. Simply look at philosophy.