Please, first-worlders, share your wisdom with us and help us achieve your standard of living...

Please, first-worlders, share your wisdom with us and help us achieve your standard of living, please help us fulfill your expectations and rise from the filth and chaos that we've created for ourselves

Attached: 858456234623.gif (498x377, 303K)

stop watching anime go outside and better your own community

be rich lol

you can't because we're already reached 1st world status. we have to keep you guys down to keep our living standards this level. the best of you can immigrate here though, but your countries are forever fucked until you dethrone us.

stop trying to fix the system and just try to ascend the food chain

Just cross the fucking border, retarded

This the true answer , first time I seen a first world worlder confess or know this
Thank you leaf

This
America for everyone nigger

Attached: images.jpeg-8.jpg (606x506, 23K)

Mexico is already the world's 15th largest economy. What the fuck are you doing with that money?

>What the fuck are you doing with that money?
Buying guns from AmeriKKKa

Attached: 8809.jpg (1328x271, 57K)

1.Travel to New World
2.Subjugate natives
????
PROFIT

The only way is to develop your country. Ignore the retarded liberals, don't privatize all your stuff like a fucking retard like we are doing.

but that's exactly how he ended up in his current predicament

Attached: 1525733583068.jpg (680x401, 37K)

Is that why Southeast Asia is seeing major economic boost ?
Is that why the global economy is becoming ever more interlinked and capital is traveling around the world more than ever ?

Having a functional state is normally pretty important
You need to get past that before you can even think about nice soc den things

so they are making a little money? they aren't even close to catching up to us. the median wealth of the most advanced country in SEA, malayasia, is a paltry 7000. the median income in canada makes that in 2 months.

travel to africa and exploit africans for recources

They're growing, but you're deluded if you think they're just making a little money.
It's a trend.

World economy doesn't revolve around keeping other country down, hell country's influence in it is as low as ever.

they will hit the middle income trap soon

and i'm telling ya, they'll never amount to anything. they are only growing because the developed nations are consuming. when they get to the point of even remotely approaching us, their wages will rise and we will abandon them and move the factories in the next shit hole. we will continue to build wealth at a greater a pace than them and while they may be growing in GDP, it will be spread among a relatively large population.

Participate in the 4th industrial revolution

There is some exploitation but it's basically to let foreign companies use the cheapest labour
And that's what gets countries out of being agricultural anyway. Basically every third world country is better than it has ever been before

Kys cringelord faggot

You're not cute.

What seems the most plausible to you ?

>A. Third world countries are poor, because of political instability and corruption, making any investments both native and foreigns hazardous; because of the shortage of high skilled workers; and because of outdated policies and industry.

>B. They're being kept down, just because.

why do you hate him?

those two scenarios are not mutually exclusive user. has it occurred to you that some of us cause those problems in scenario A? guess why our immigration policies favour intelligent, educated people. who do we take them from? poorer countries seeking a higher standard of living. who do you think greases the palms of the corrupt officials in those poorer countries to set up mines and factories? who do you think pushes poorer countries into scenarios where their political parties have to bend to international norms that may not be in their best interest for 'aid'?

Too late
Do you not see the connection? Most corruption is possible because that's the will of the powers above. An economic and political system is imposed on a country; people who are malleable and agreeable get put on power by the overlords; the system never gets fixed because it's not good for business.

>why our immigration policies favour intelligent, educated people. who do we take them from?
Because companies are in need of high skilled worker, and they don't bring up crime rate ? From country with high skilled worker ?

>who do you think greases the palms of the corrupt officials in those poorer countries to set up mines and factories?
Which countries are you talking about ? For real ?

> who do you think pushes poorer countries into scenarios where their political parties have to bend to international norms that may not be in their best interest for 'aid'?
Literally any lobbyist ? They're not exclusive to third world countries user.

If anything instability ( Main reason of why lots of third world countries are poor ) isn't something that big company like.
It is not a concerned efforts from a big obscure assembly of G8 country.

>Because companies are in need of high skilled worker, and they don't bring up crime rate ? From country with high skilled worker ?

yes and that's favourable to us. but what about the poorer country where they spent money training that doctor that now works in Canada? how will they ever get their healthcare system to an advanced state if us developed countries consistently poach all their top talent with promises of wealth and standard or living? we take the best from them and leave the garbage behind.

>>Which countries are you talking about ? For real ?

well, for one, SNC lavalin was recently charged with corruption dating back to Gaddafi era Libya. you can google the numerous examples.

political instability is when the leadership of a country cannot balance the demands of its citizens. this is exacerbated when local customs do not conform with developed countries ideals. so we dangle 'aid' in front of them so that they conform to our rules, but in doing so it angers the locals. this causes political instability.