Constellation DAG

There is no proof for the FUD and these are fake forced threads because there is a partnership coming related to their TCD panel.

Co-founder

Attached: 1537852614829.jpg (1242x2208, 270K)

The unironical truth is that their CEO turned 70% of the ETH funds to LINK. Then the market tanked and we argued to turn the project into an oracle platform itself. They hired a guy from Salesforce who they know had been working on an information network for several years but then he couldn't keep up/understand the tech and showed them the finger. Left with all the LINK.

The question the team has refused to answer over and over again, was the CEO trading investor funds. Why did he disappear and what happened? When investors ask the Team refuses to answer that question over and over again.
Co-Founder says the funds are safe but he will not comment about CEO trading investor funds or what happened to him.
Does not say what funds are safe or how much is safe, it could be $20

Obvious lie GTFO with your shilling

Paid community outreach guy

Attached: 1537893072230.png (1224x2201, 634K)

No, he runs their trader channel and has no inside knowledge of the business and also admitted he found this all very suspicious. Go ask him yourself.
Also you are the paid outreach guy, piss off

LOL nice try though. Man these people are desperate. Your bags must be heavy af

I can't believe someone who is fudding for almost a week now with multiple threads per day, you either have mental issues or you try to suppress the price to get a cheaper buy-in. Too bad Jow Forums doesn't move prices that much.

There is no volume to accumulate anything. Take 5 eth and you can moon this coin yourself. This isnt about fudding for cheaper prices. Its about getting answers for investors who lost money. You are obviously still holding bags so I understand your need to try and cover this up until you can unload your bags. Too bad for you, no volume on this shitcoin. This team will be held accountable

I don't care at all, it's just too obvious that you are a brainlet or have some other reason to fud that much. Maybe you should try your campaign on reddit if you want answers from the devs, I don't know any company who gives a shit about Jow Forums.

Good luck.

Look at volume then kys for those lies. If you cared about this project and weren't trying to just offload your bags on to some unsuspecting investor you would be pressing the team for answers. Instead you try to discredit anyone who asks
That's some evil shit

its
1) a group of individuals trying to blackmail dag for money with coordinated bullshit fud (made up accusation of ceo daytrading ico money)
2) an engruntled coder, who was hired to code the ico platform, got paid for that, and thought he would get more money/jobs, but he didnt. now hes trying to hurt the project out of butthurtery (Im looking your way michael salmon)
3) people who got burned hard, sold the bottom (here) and are now bitter and try to vent
4) individuals who believe in the project and try to get some good deals at this point here
5) sensationalist "journalists" (everybody can call themself that, even if you "work" for a blog with 5 readers per year, Im looking your way Dimitar Mihov you fucking loser) trying to get a clickbait story for salty r/buttcoin redditors
6) investors who actually want an answer on the situation with the ceo, and that is understandable

a mixture of those. but mainly 1)

1) a group of individuals trying to blackmail dag for money with coordinated bullshit fud (made up accusation of ceo daytrading ico money)
>So your saying that a group of individuals is blackmailing the company because the team refuses to address very legitimate concerns about their CEO disappearing and the allegations of illegal activity. LOL makes no sense but i guess thats a nice spin to make the team not look as stupid as they do atm
2) an engruntled coder, who was hired to code the ico platform, got paid for that, and thought he would get more money/jobs, but he didnt. now hes trying to hurt the project out of butthurtery (Im looking your way michael salmon)
> very doubtful although he probably doesnt have nice things to say about the team or community with how they have handled his departure
3) people who got burned hard, sold the bottom (here) and are now bitter and try to vent
>probably plenty of this
4) individuals who believe in the project and try to get some good deals at this point here
This is a fake argument. There is no way to get a good deal. There is no volume. Bag holders push this idea to deflect the damage the team is doing
5) sensationalist "journalists" (everybody can call themself that, even if you "work" for a blog with 5 readers per year, Im looking your way Dimitar Mihov you fucking loser) trying to get a clickbait story for salty r/buttcoin redditors
> I think you are going to be surprised by the real journalist digging into this mess and the evidence they have in hand. There is a reason the team wont comment
6) investors who actually want an answer on the situation with the ceo, and that is understandable
> this is the majority of people here. I dont think you understand the gravity of the situation. Sitting in the TG circlejerk playing bag holder bingo might be screwing with your thought process. Investors got screwed, asking for answers and getting the finger
Now that finger is being shoved up their ass

Bag holder bingo pro right here, holy shit that's delusional

This a whole new version of bagholder bingo, now with more delusion