group project with a bunch of commie business students.
lamo
i really want to shit on my group, but an A is an A.
TL:DR. poor people in brazil should starve than to eat the garbage.
===================================
We do not think that Nestle is operating ethically in Brazil. Being the largest country in South America, Brazil has 208 million people to feed. As the Brazilian economy has grown their health problem of people starving has now changed into the increased rate of obesity. With a motto such as “Good Food, Good Life” you would think that Nestle would provide the very best food products for their consumers to buy. Nestle would like consumers to believe their food is nutritious and healthy and they claim to care for their consumers well being. But based on this case study we do not believe that Nestle does what they say they do.
Nestle is one of the larger companies in the world. In fact, as of 2016 Nestle is the largest food company in terms of sales at 91.1 billion dollars according to Business Insider.com. Because Nestle is such a large company, they have a lot of stakeholders across the world that can be directly affected by the actions of the firm. In this case, the citizens of Brazil are considered a primary stakeholder of Nestle’s actions. According to the case file, well-developed countries in the Americas and Europe are no longer demanding the cheap, highly processed foods that Nestle produces. Which is why Nestle has started to focus on countries like Brazil. Traditional Brazilian diet is being replaced with the ultra-processed food made from cheap commodities that require little to no cooking. Because these products are so cheap and mostly require no cooking, the citizens of Brazil may seem forced to consume these products considering the average Brazilian citizen is living in poverty. Nestle focused their marketing and sales for poor countries like Brazil thinking that they could solve hunger problems, which they did for Brazil at least. When the Brazilian citizens started consuming the Nestle products instead of their traditional food, it creates another problem for the country. The citizens are not used to these ultra-processed foods so when their diet switched they became obese but malnourished at the same time. The processed foods the citizens are consuming do not contain the proper nutrients that are needed to survive in that region of the world. If Brazil does not change it ways, it could become the most obese nation in the world in the next 15 years according to Business Insider.com. Nestle understands this, and yet still decides to sell ultra-processed foods in poor countries because the citizens will buy them so they don’t starve. Nestle is taking advantage of these citizens and it is causing a serious health crisis in Brazil.
Justin Sanchez
Moving forward Nestle should come out with a different motto to use. They do not offer “Good Food, Good Life” to the people in developing countries who are purchasing their processed foods. This leads people to believe they will live a good life, while eating good food. Nestle food products may taste good but that does not mean they are good for you. We do not think that changing their motto would affect their performance. Since Nestle products is being purchased by people in developing countries who are malnourished Nestle should revamp their products. They should still make great tasting food products but also make products that will help people in the developing countries that are purchasing their products. We think that this will not only help people like the people in Brazil but will also increase Nestle sales and improve their performance. ===================================== i guess i can talk a little about how corrupt the Brazil government is to rather make money from the big corporal than taking care of its people.
tho, the country has very few flat land and good port. i guess they just have to make due.
Delete this unless you want it to show up on plagerism report
Matthew Cox
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i forgot about this. how do i delete it?
Isaac Gray
alright, i just reported my post for "off topic"
Easton Hall
man this is so poorly written all school projects these days have such a specific, awkward phrasing to them. like some autistic language for retards the brainwashing is real. by telling people you have to write a certain way, you limit their thought process. reward the sheep, penalize actual thinkers, soon enough you're left with an army of drones
Adrian Hall
Why do kikes act like processed food causes obesity? It doesn't. Eating too much processed food causes obesity. Just stop eating so much you gluttonous fucks.
Bentley Clark
Here's the porn you asked me to commission you. You specifically wanted it to include that nazi frog right? I hope your university doesn't find out about the sick shit you're into...
i feel it's alright. i guess they were just trying to quote the source material. and plus, no one really gives a fuck in business ethics class.
Isaiah Davis
bit connect.
Connor Miller
As an user above already highlighted, this pathetic case study is so poorly written that it almost seems as if the texts original form has been processed through some sort of prole machine before being delivered to us in some base vernacular known only to 105ers. It defies belief that business students (or any students for that matter) should be so lacking in prose that their conception of satisfactory text is this limp deconstruction of thought. I can imagine it now... ‘yes, this sounds smart, this is what professionals write like!’ said Stacy, her porky fingers hovering over the touchbar on her new MacBook (bought on finance, of course). Taking a sip of her extra shot extra syrup frappucino, she scans her magnum opus, the distilled brilliance of her mind, mouthing the passages as she goes, delighting in her work. ‘Moving forward Nestle should come out with a different motto to use...’ SUBMIT
Samuel Young
it was a group project, they just put a couple guys' opinion together and call it an essay
Hudson Gonzalez
You're trying too hard
Josiah James
I am irrefutably in acquiescence with what my eloquent accomplice sine nomine has demurred here. The linguistic apathy of the contemporaneous postdoctorate fellow is languidly callous toward the learned faculties.
Eli Ward
You talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded.
Hunter Long
fuck, this thread thought summer was over tempted to post gore on this sage in all fields
