At what point is this going to be a problem for TSLA?

at what point is this going to be a problem for TSLA?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-10-08 at 12.32.44 PM.png (1296x650, 92K)

It'll never be a problem unless they have convertible bonds or want to raise capital in the form of convertible bonds or equity.

Tesla was always a stock subsidised by the government and low interest rates. Such companies don't survive when interest rates go up.

Wait

It’s down 60 points in a week?

Attached: EFFF53DE-A420-4941-90D5-1D3FC273FD07.jpg (529x529, 86K)

Attached: bobrosstwx.png (1540x1068, 1.17M)

TSLA is going to moon hard there is a bullish stoch rsi divergence on the monthly. :D All this FUD is so some kikes can load up heavy bags. It might have another leg down but the future is bright, the bots will trade this.

>TSLA is going to moon hard there is a bullish stoch rsi divergence on the monthly. :D All this FUD is so some kikes can load up heavy bags. It might have another leg down but the future is bright, the bots will trade this.
Isn't it still trading at a high earnings multiple?

lowest it'll go is 200.

>the bots will trade this

Elon Musk saved by a bunch of AI's... Better than going under, I guess

umm sweetie, the convertible bond due Feb 2019 prices are at $360. He is fucked.

>umm sweetie, the convertible bond due Feb 2019 prices are at $360.
what does that mean

JUST

Attached: JUST PAPI.png (829x262, 31K)

>sweetie
>what does that mean
he's hot for you

aww that's sweet

Is there any way Tesla can survive this?

>Is there any way Tesla can survive this?
Maybe musk should stop fucking drug addicts and tweeting about Saudi buyouts and the SEC's unfair regulations about lying about buyouts being the cause of his stock going down for like a week

>tweeting about Saudi buyouts and the SEC's unfair regulations
Elon WANTS to be 'fired' by the SEC.
He know Tesla is FUBAR, but being fired by the SEC allows him to spin the inevitable default into SEC's fault.
SEC knows this, which is why they are soft on him.

>Elon WANTS to be 'fired' by the SEC.
if that were true he would have gone along with it

with what? sec allowed him to remain ceo

they were forcing him to resign as chairman of the board

which was a symbolic concession in his case

well the SEC is not going to pull him as CEO, that was not even discussed

exactly, which is why he's chimping out

maybe i have not really thought of it that way before, seems like a pretty elaborate ruse

>Conservatards are ITT crying again