Google

Name one thing GNU that doesn't have a non-GNU alternative.

Attached: 1532142471618.png (3388x3638, 280K)

how about you provide your own sources for the arguments you make?

You're asking me to list every piece of GNU software ever made, and list the alternative. A fool's errand. I'm asking you to name one piece of software.

Attached: original prankster.jpg (1024x1372, 197K)

all i'm asking you to do is provide sources for the claims you make, yet you can't seem to do that, all you do is post unrelated images and schizophrenic-like rants that don't seem to be related to anything?

Apple and Amazon are going to be the big winners. Amazon because it's the new global business for everything, Apple because it has been moving to change the online space to one it controls (moving everything to apps rather than websites) and will continue to retain its strong niche market in hardware.

Google's ad revenue will decline. Facebook will become increasingly irrelevant. Microsoft will hang in by inertia.

Windows and OSX will continue to be strong while Linux continues to be a joke relegated to revenues from tech support.

>all i'm asking you to do is provide sources for every piece of GNU software ever made
And I'm telling you I will. Name one that doesn't have an alternative, and I will provide a source for one that exists.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
here you go sweaty, if you can read give this a good hard go and return when you've understood it

That's not a piece of GNU software, user

Attached: point and laugh.gif (722x720, 405K)

so i take it you gave up on attempting to understand the article? i hope you at least gave it the good old community college try

I didn't even click. That's not what we agreed on. You provide GNU software that doesn't have an alternative, and I disprove you with a counter-example. It's called Linux, not GNU/Linux for a reason.

show me where i have agreed with you on the terms you claim

The burden of proof is on you.

as is the proof on you for your gnu claim

yeah if i only had to hold two stocks it would be amazon and apple.

>as is the proof on you for your gnu claim
It's Linux. Not GNU/Linux. QED

Attached: (you).png (448x468, 297K)

>Google coin

>Facebook coin

>Microsoft coin

>Apple coin

>Amazon coin

>Windows coin

>OSX coin

>Linux coin

>Free and open-source software community coin

so you can not provide proof for your claims is what you are saying, good to know.

I provided a source for every piece of software you named user.

Attached: 2 frames is surely enough.gif (500x454, 165K)

i hope you understand that that is not how arguments works, the one who makes a claim is expected to provide sources for his claim, claiming something and telling your opponent to find sources for it himself just makes you look bad and uneducated

You're asking me to prove a near infinite amount of things. I'm asking for one counter example.

Attached: point and laugh.jpg (1000x708, 132K)

i am not asking you to provide infinite anything, all i need is for you to source the claims you make, posting anime pictures will not help you

>i am not asking you to provide infinite anything
You're asking me to provide a source for every piece of GNU software's alternative. I'm saying that's laborious, and I'd rather prove it to you by asking you to provide a counter example. You can't provide one, so the statement seems valid.

no, I can provide whatever I want, yet I refuse because the proof of a claim lays on the one making it

My claim is
>I can name a non-GNU alternative for every piece of GNU software
You state
>Okay prove it
I say
>No problem. Name a piece of GNU software
You say
>No
The conversation will not progress because you won't let it.

Attached: this guy.jpg (1200x1200, 119K)

Your claim is:
>I can name a non-GNU alternative for every piece of GNU software
I state
>Okay prove it
You state
>No, I can not, you prove it

Error! no software named. Cannot provide counter-example for undeclared example. Please try again.

so, you can not provide any sources for the initial claim that you made?

36 replies and I've provided counter-example for each example you came up with.

have you provided a counter-example for the fact that you can not source the claims you have made?

Does the set containing all sets include itself?

does the person making a claim on Jow Forums have to provide proof?

Linux exists in a non-free, non-GNU form. What else do you need proof of?

i would like proof of the claims you have made in your post here

>Brave
Competing with Google for top browser. Expanded into other competing areas, using the BAT token as a means to support web content creators a la Patreon.

Attached: brave.jpg (1940x956, 73K)

Sure thing. We'll do a direct proof. You name a piece of GNU software that doesn't have a an alternative, and I'll provide a counter-example. Once we have expended all options, the statement will hold true. I'll wait for you to start before making my next reply.

Attached: i'm waiting.jpg (900x900, 57K)

>We'll do a direct proof
I would love that! Please directly prove your statements so we can be done with this conversation.

Emacs
/argument

vi