Enigma 2 Chainlink 0

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto. Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust. 'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen. The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

guy is just saying oracles will come baked in with the enigma blockchain vs CL simply acting as a bandaid patch on ethereum due to technical limitations

So you can either use Chainlink that’s blockchain agnostic with all your current legacy systems OR you can completely redo your entire infrastructure and be forced to use enigma for everything because the devs claimed it would have baked in oracles without having anything to show for it

Hmmmmm

enigma will be agnostic you brainlet

Enigma is trash and Chainlink is already working see this thread from yesterday:

enigma testnet live as well, mainnet eoy with staking

Tfw both made up 50/50 on portfolio. Comfy desu

Reminds me of tron where the founder claimed it could cure cancer or manipulate the fine constants every other week. It’s easy for your shitcoin devs to make bold claims but not so easy to implement.

coindesk.com/8-blockchain-projects-enlist-early-to-test-secret-enigma-contracts/

Attached: 1492389742397.jpg (634x634, 45K)

checked

premieroffshore.com/offshore-ico-scam-and-cayman-islands-corporations/
guess where chainlink is based out of

chainlink is a scam. they are not partnered with swift, they paid to have a booth at their show. sergey is incapable of finishing a project and his history has shown he will not be following through with this either.

youtube.com/watch?v=1nmLU284fIk