WTC releases real HW

walty releases real hardware

medium.com/@Waltonchain_EN/waltonchain-reveals-the-iot-ru20-a-uhf-android-smart-rfid-reader-writer-to-support-high-level-e6aabcd4b9af

Attached: 1_4rZnntX_DeHusUO3Av4PKw.jpg (1500x1000, 153K)

the fucking STATE of that lmfao

hire an industrial designer ffs

Needs more plug-ins

What year is it 1999?kek

it reads 450 tags per second

This is for use in factories and such. Noone cares what it looks like, as long as you can drop it 50 times and have a truck run over it.

Attached: photo_2018-04-24_16-02-21.jpg (512x512, 41K)

this

Attached: 1_B37RbEc8Kmin2i2hTOLsuA.png (438x527, 22K)

also name other projects with real in-house developed HW

What's the point of reading tags so fast? Wouldn't you run out of tags eventually?

Tags can be read at 450 per second and the reading distance is 15 meters.

That's full industrial level and it's crypto.

>What's the point of reading tags so fast?
>Wouldn't you run out of tags eventually?

Attached: 7fa.png (662x708, 792K)

good luck trying to sell that thing lmao

Again, they are a hardware company, we knew they could do this. Does their software keep up? That's yet to be seen.

Should have just made the hardware and used oracles

why use third party when they can do decentralization with their own blockchain?

History would say they don't know wtf they are doing with blockchain. Hows the token swap going? Tough nut to crack?

yea, just pick one of that massive amount of oracles out there. Currently it's faster to develop a blockchain than waiting for a suitable oracle.

walton was one of the only real use case out there, i did join the ico and dump at 10$, meaby join again once btc takes the dump

If by develop a blockchain you mean fork an existing one, sure.

so what blockchain are you suggesting WTC should use?

LINK IS DEAD

it's not

Holy fuck it's not even a Gigabit ethernet port wtf

I'm suggesting a team that excels in hardware should concentrate on that, and use sw developed by experts in that field

I love the wtc idea, just dont trust the team to execute the part of it they have no experience in

> 450 tags per second
> gigabit
are you retarded?

You would place this under a conveyor belt in a factory for instance, allowing it to scan the products that roll by (sometimes at very high speeds).

A FUCKING BOX
there is probably just a raspi inside

Attached: adolf.jpg (184x176, 7K)

kek yeah let's ramp up production costs so ppl can use it to download rdr2

So what if it is? The point is that it reads a large amount of NFC tags from very far away and registers them in a blockchain or whatever. A raspi would be capable of that. It's expensive because its an industrial strength NFC reader.

>production costs
>adds hdmi post but not g-eth

audio too.

The purpose of this device is to read/write RFID tags and possible register them in a blockchain. Why the fuck would you need gigabit?

Lol. Lets add hdmi, audio and require a power pack instead of proper iec connector....oh and lets make it 100mbps network #china

I can't imagine the cost difference in more than 2 cents. Who even manufacturers these last generation parts

Since it runs android I'm assuming there's some kind of user interface for this device. So what's wrong with HDMI to connect it to a display?

I'll agree that audio is not needed for this use case. And if they really wanted it they could have audio over HDMI.

Overall, I'm pretty sure the specs and ports have been mulled over during the design phase and it's just us guessing now over a medium post.