Serious discussion: Which platform will

make the blockchain scalable in order to compete at least with VISA and more?
Is it ZIL? Waves? Ethereum itself? EOS?
Or is it IOTA?

Attached: financial.png (1366x768, 1.02M)

Its link you idiot

Of course it is
Eth though

eth with sharding? How is ZIL netxt sharding?

link is the glue between off cahin and on chain, I am referring to scalabilitly in this tread

Constellation/DAG with its micro services architecture and/or Chinese HPB High Performance Blockchain with hardware acceleration.

I trust more the Eth team.
Don't quite know much though.

This, it’s DAG

Link is the Glue between on chain and off-chain data I am referring to scalability in this tread

What is this mircoservice's architecture and in what is it different form IOTA, which is hated so much around here. Please argoment the answer, please. I want to buy your coin, but you should tell me the difference IOTA-- DAG costellation weed

Right now the only crypto currencies capable of handling transactions anywhere close tonas fast as Visa and MC are XRP and Holo. ZIL is a failing project because they can’t make sharding work and had to postpone mainnet because of it at about the same time ETH postponed scaling, too. Sharding is not the way forward, user.

Even though VISA claims their server can handle up to 56k tx/s, the fact is that the network rarely exceeds 1,700 tx/s. For a blockchain platform, you actually don’t even need more than a couple of hundreds transactions per second, as long as each dApp has their own blockchain. Because in what circumstances would you need to process more transactions per second than the biggest payment system in the world?

I think platforms that are giving each dApp their own blockchain are going to have a huge advantage in this race. All things considered, SkyFiber (Skycoin) and HBP will have the best chance because they have dedicated hardwares on top of a well-design architecture.

Attached: 97C9E919-250C-4953-BA4B-E61A44E4BD2D.jpg (1280x807, 182K)

Why is sharding not the way to go?

dedicated hardware is a buzz word, what kind of hardware can make the blockchain scalable?

Friendly Reminder:
XLM/CHAIN has already been chosen by VISA.

When Skycoins new consensus algorithm is fully operational, there will be no limit to scalability due to unlimited parallel blockchains. The consensus algo will have very low cost to run so it will be massively distributed. No transaction fees and block rewards will prevent centralization.

If the hardware is built only to serve the blockchain, it surely can handle more than a normal piece of hardware

Yes XLM is very interesting too.

Isn't sharding working on ZIL testnet?

It is. So many people will kill themselves because they overlooked ZIL below 10 cents. Missing the biggest moon mission since ETH because of this garbage ass fud is peak brainlet.

How much zil too make it??

These shills cant answer this question because DAG is nothing special. The team fell apart and ran through their $33M investment in 6 months. Only an idiot would invest in DAG.

Seriously? XEM. Get on board.

Attached: atodaso.jpg (614x411, 76K)