So this guy posted yesterday that he sold for VET.
NANO is up ~20% since then and VET is down a few %.
LMAO.
Patience is key my frens.
Also, NANO is a pretty interesting coin.
NANO : Don't be this guy
Jack White
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
bitcoinkit.com
exposingthelieofislam.wordpress.com
medium.com
medium.com
reddit.com
reddit.com
accenture.com
ccn.com
archive.is
nano.org
archive.is
archive.fo
news.kucoin.com
reddit.com
archive.is
reddit.com
reddit.com
nanode.co
quora.com
archive.is
archive.is
nanode.co
reddit.com
reddit.com
archive.is
quora.com
quora.com
quora.com
youtu.be
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
prnt.sc
prnt.sc
archive.is
bitsonline.com
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
i.imgur.com
i.imgur.com
i.imgur.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
youtu.be
imgur.com
imgur.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
twitter.com
Landon Sanchez
I'm going to drop some really bad news later today or tomorrow for the guy who sold all his Nano.
John Evans
So nano is decent despite being a redditor coin?
Chase Stewart
>linux
not gonna make it user
Jackson Williams
I tried to tell em
Justin Jackson
If it's the same news I'm thinking of it won't be until later in the month but regardless patience will pay off
Kevin Sanders
Nano has the most bullish chart. It's going to skyrocket.
Aaron Nelson
Nano is a total shitcoin with constant node crashes, even with very low TPS levels. It was originally pushed by Italian scammers and the dev team is the most incompetent in crypto. Take a look at this:
Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
archive.is
Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
archive.is
Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
archive.is
Also notice the sheer stupidity and denial from the insane nano community
Easton Campbell
>Pic, Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018, buying some more, while screaming: "2 da moooOOoooon!!"
Justin Garcia
Just look at the stupid comments from the crazy and fanatic nanoids.
Nano is bitconnect 2.0
Carter Clark
pls drop it now right here senpai.
lmao i've tried to tell so many times.
LOL this guy again. Sad you lost all your money on bitgrail. but it was your own fault.
no-one with half a brain trusted that shit exchange.
I've been introducing all my friends to crypto with nano, it's fast, it's free and it just works.
I've noticed nothign about your stupid node crashes and fud tier bs. lmao
It's good new DAG tech and competitor for digital cash. now gtfo my thread you salty loser.
Ayden Lee
nano is a good fren
Anthony Ross
I bought at 20k sats, 30k sats and 40k sats.
not everyone buys the top lmao. pleb,
Jeremiah Cox
Are you the same nano idiot with your stupid VPN talking to yourself all the time. I see you moron did not address a single point. No logic, no reason, no facts, just smear and utter nano garbage. Your shitcoin will crash. Go back to plebbit, boomer.
John Clark
>no using Jow Forums tomorrow style
you idiots are destroying your eyes
Nolan Taylor
lol howmuch did you lose ? : D r u financially ruined :D well don't buy back in now, stay out, stay ruined.
Joseph Gonzalez
Yeah, all crazy nanoids bought everything at all time low, or you day-traded like the world's best business genius. None of you are affected by the catastrophic disaster like the nano shitcoin truly is. No one is believing you fanatic idiots. Go home. You have to go. Back to plebbit boomer. Feels like stealing, right boomer? Pic related.
Ryder Brown
>beard grooming
>The Kabba Original
Leo Smith
Believe me douchebag, I have far more money than you do. Not that it is an argument or even relevant. You nano psychos are so stupid.
Aaron Ramirez
lmao keep the butthurt coming :D
Cameron Anderson
>lmao keep the butthurt coming :D
Great way of defending your shitcoin. Total joke.
Parker Sanchez
le vindicated screencap poster
Leo Bell
Gnu plus linux to you
Brayden Cruz
>stupid boomer and plebbit pretending to be from Jow Forums. You have to go back, boomer. Pic related.
Daniel Roberts
come December this will be an obvious portfolio addition for potential suicide prevention. Alot of invested characters will be against it though.. miners.. arbitration.. cashcoins.. got a lot against it
John White
please drop the news. I'm just buying nano cause it works. I don't follow the news for it.
Zachary Ortiz
The protocol is stated to be completed by end of year. Comes with a bunch of tech which fixes some of the FUD surrounding it. Its been stated a few times that the team is making sure that the protocol is finished before finalizing adoption partnerships which they have been approached with already. Security audit will lead to coinbase + brainblocks fiat ramp. Basically it will be very well positioned for the next bullrun. So an obvious choice for serious gains.. Was one of the first movers in the turn around too.
Charles Walker
Are there any news about the security audit? Never heard anything.
Jackson Smith
"Meeting with multiple candidates for the audit and collecting proposals and ideas on how the candidate would plan to proceed. When chosen, they will be announced publicly." Doubtful will hear anything more than this cause there is no point till Vote Stapling, Lazy Bootstrapping, Spam prevention and Pruning are on mainnet
Jaxon James
Vechain fucks should kill themselves at this point. How brainless garbage like this can even breathe!?
Ayden Morris
Have you managed to have at least 2 months without severe node crashes and frozen accounts on trading platforms? Many years ago it was promised that sooooooon, the node problems would be fixed, pic related.
Evan Anderson
Nano always have insane partnership rumours, in true bitconnect style, pic related.
Jaxson Perez
and this insane rumour, pic related. Plus paypal, bank of America etc, etc.
Samuel Rogers
bitcoinkit.com
It's also been stable for the last couple of version. Shitty exchanges will be shitty exchanges and new code will be new code. and 'you' - I just do proper checks on the state of all sort of crypto and keep away from the tribalism bs. This is a good pickup once the protocol is finished. Will hit coinbase early 2019
William Bennett
lol, well spotted.
Nolan Lopez
Agreed - no idea who would have approached them. Very doubtful any bignames would approach a crypto not in the top 10. Would be more early devs with ideas who can use a POS coin with 0 fees as the base protocol. Good moonshot coin for 2019 but time will tell... worth 5-20% dec/jan
Julian Evans
Coinbase is now listing Nano as a currency you can track.
Brayden Brown
lols. just to put things straight. not everything is what it seems
Colton Parker
nobshit retard. see for yourself, download a wallet and go to a faucet to see how fast it is. get some of your friends to do the same. it's what everyone thought crypto would be.
Dominic Sullivan
I litteraly got 5 friends their first crypto coins using nano. I bought some on binance, sent to my computer wallet, then I send it to my phone wallet. then I used the QR code and got friends to download the phone wallet and all send them some nano.
it was so fast and so easy.
I'd never do this with (((Bitcoin))).
Maybe with BCH. but corecoin? lmao.
Grayson Roberts
it's been on there for a month or two, along with the rest of the top 50 coins.
Brayden Nelson
to add to that, one of my retard friends even managed to introduce a tech illeterate that doesn't have a laptop and can barily work with his phone to download the wallet and send him some nano.
I was amazed that even my most retarded friends could easily use it and explain how to use to other even more retarded friends.
and that's why I keep buying this shit.
also, we plan on using it during festivals and regularly use it to pay eachother for favors.
like last time I didn't want to buy more drinking coupons, I just sent a fren some nano and he gave me one coupon, so I didn't have to buy like 10
Hudson Moore
pic related for all the newfags. also charlie lee sold his LTC and bought NANO. there will be huge news this month. the devs have been busting their asses with protocol updates the last two months. this is it lads; if you're not on this train you will regret it very soon.
Jackson Sullivan
same here friend. they all said, this is what i thought BTC would be; it's so much easier and it's fast and feeless.
Lincoln Hall
Stupid nano bot. The bitconnect crowd has now jumped on the next scam, - nano. So tragic.
Evan Anderson
>It's also been stable for the last couple of version.
Crashed just a few weeks ago with version 16.
>Will hit coinbase early 2019
How do you know? With the insane node problems, vulnerability to spam attack, no security audit etc, - I would guess late 2019, hopelessly behind everyone else, if ever.
Grayson Adams
Dont think Binance's withdraws or deposits have been down since June - There were issues with the mac nodes in v16 for sure though. I think you might be exaggerating the node issues for whatever reasons but once the protocol is done the nodes will be seriously lightweight compared to bitcoin. Maybe we settle with mid 2019 as I am an optimistic guy. This is going to be the most lightweight crypto out there if you look at the code so no way that there is an issue of centralization in the future. The devs have lots of work to do though.. good luck to them
Xavier Green
well, as a user, I haven't had any problems with my wallet not working or not being able to transact, ever. So all this node issue stuff? doesn't matter.
Jose Diaz
funny but a month ago I heard all kinds of nasty shit about this coin, now that it pumped it's a NEW PARADIGM. you fuckers can't be trusted for sure
Hudson Powell
>8/22/18
get a load of this shitlord
Henry Sanders
>t. miner who knows his days are numbered
Evan Bailey
>didn't do his own research and download wallet to try for himself
>relying on what others say
NPC detected and definitely not going to make it
Grayson Sullivan
I must have daily updates that you nano boomer morons are flooding biz with your spam? Are you on medication, grandpa?
>t. miner who knows his days are numbered
Bitconnect 2.0 "argumentation"
Here, nano psycho, address the insane problems with yourtotal shitcoin with constant node crashes, even with very low TPS levels. It was originally pushed by Italian scammers and the dev team is the most incompetent in crypto. Take a look at this:
Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
archive.is
Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
archive.is
Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
archive.is
Also notice the sheer stupidity and denial from the insane nano community
Easton Martin
>7/19/2018
you're going the wrong way retard. LMAO at you so hard.
all these old posts again that you are claiming are true. yes, there were node crashes with the 15.1 release due to a syncing issue, but it was resolved in the 15.2 release. now 16.2 is out and working great, with v17 (Boulton) coming out within weeks.
move on with your tired shit. i sincerely hope you're doing reverse trolling because you really are a retard if that's not the case.
Blake James
>there were node crashes with the 15.1 release due to a syncing issue, but it was resolved in the 15.2 release. now 16.2
Total bullshit. Again more lies from you nano psychos and your retarded shitcoin. Enjoy moron:
medium.com
Elijah Thompson
>9/17/18
>got the version number off by one
good lord, you are so buttmad you come off like Bitfinex'd.
try keeping up you actual retard
>medium.com
>Following the successful release of version 16.2 last week
Carson Reed
I've been holding nano since January. There's no reason why this coin won't go to Pluto. I am 100% certain nano will reach $1000 per token within the next few years. I have every dime bet on it
Alexander Watson
>redditfag posts shill thread on Jow Forums
>this guy is still mad 2 months later
Justin Bailey
>Nano has 756 TPS [1][2]. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [3]. Competitors work on 1 million TPS solutions [4]. Nano’s aim to be global currency is either delusional or a fraud.
>7,000 TPS was falsely boosted and promoted, causing the Nano price to skyrocket 97.7x in December 2016 alone. Real transactions per second (TPS) for Nano, however, was a meagre and pathetic 100-200 TPS [5].
>Nano falsely claim theoretical unlimited scalability, only constrained by hardware and bandwidth limitation [6]. This is as absurd as claiming that a car has unlimited speed theoretically, and the goal is to drive so fast that the car escapes earth’s gravitational field and park on the moon. Nano’s technical updates don’t bring it closer to the goal. It’s like saying the improvements on the engine of the car has brought us closer to driving to the moon.
>Nano advocates like to use average demand as benchmark for needed TPS. This is false. Who will use a currency that will crash at every emergency, at Christmas and other holidays?
>Nano (Raiblocks) was a dead amateur coin, worth less than 10 cents less than a year ago, until it was discovered and pumped hard by Italian scammers. Only after the pump did Nano full time dev. This amateur project has had a full-time dev for less than a year, with a horrific team and management picked among incompetent friends and supporters.
>Lead devs are leaving Nano. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.
>Devs are dumping Nano on the market [7]. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.
Christian Cruz
(Cont.)
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. All exchanges down less than 6 weeks ago [8]. Kucoin less than 3 weeks ago [9]. Another failed update and node crash this week [10][11]. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency.
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [8] [9] [10] [11]. Coinbase will also stay away from a coin riddled with legal problems [7] [12]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, if at all, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost [13] [14]. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Having the problem highlighted to them, admitting to it, their response has been the usual -to promise and deflect -without providing any real technical solution. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. This also scares the Coinbase experts; a total crash in Nano, via spam vulnerability and insane node issues, will reflect badly on Coinbase.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography. A disaster in waiting.
William Powell
(Cont.)
>Former head of engineering at Facebook, Bryan Veloso: Nano "just a hype...no real use case" [16]. Currently NANO is only processing 0.15 transactions per second. Transactions have gone down in the last months. Extreme low usage combined with a very speculative 90x pump in just one month, causing a flash crash, are all indicators of a coin with pure hype and speculation, without any real value. Bryan Veloso’s claim that Nano is just hype with no real use cases is validated by empirical data.
>Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin: “Nano will have a hard time being decentralized... It won't be as uncensorable as Bitcoin or Litecoin” [17]. “Nano is not without faults...it has a LONG way to go” [18].
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately, at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that devs are dumping Nano in a fire sale [15].
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy.
>Nano’s essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon, eBay, etc. will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through it in a matter of 1-3 years [15]. Also, multiple pending and coming lawsuits against the Nano foundation.
>100 addresses hold 65% of all 133 million Nano. Initial distribution to friends of developers, nontransparent distribution method. Who solved the captchas? Where is the audit? Extreme centralization that only got worse with BitGrail, where large holders of Nano (including devs/friends of devs) managed illegally and unethically to get out of the insolvent exchange, leaving normal investors behind to take an 80% loss.
Noah Murphy
(Cont.)
> 51.27% voting weight, held in 6 addresses, opens vulnerability to devastating 51% attacks.
>Flawed structure, currently insane 92% of the voting power in the top 1% of the nodes only [19].
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilizing high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model that will most likely crash the network. Even if it worked, no matter how unlikely, with full adaption the cost of running a node would be astronomical, leading to extreme centralization. Having again the elites controlling our money must be avoided. No financial incentives for DPOS representatives to keep securing the network.
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH), pumped again. Failing to pump further, will result in a dump again, very soon. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>70% centralization of all Nano, due to Nano original developers setting default node to their own.
>The code hasn't even been audited by an established software security company.
>Nano is permissioned and non-trustless [20]
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [21]
>90% of github commits by only one person (Colin) in the whole “team”.
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
Brandon Cox
Whats the go with you? I mean your fud larps are fun to read but what is actually up? accumulating?
Xavier Bailey
(Cont.)
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with, it’s just an empty logo. Unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Nano has post Bitgrail probably the worst community in crypto [22][23], much of it due to the Nano teams catastrophic handling of the Bitgrail crash.>There are many other coins that are far better than Nano, with instant transactions, zero fees, near infinite scalability, near infinite decentralization, permissionlessness and trustlessness, 1 millionth the energy usage of Bitcoin [24][25][26]. Nano is an extremely risky investment [27]
>Posted some of the above questions on Nano subreddit. Got banned.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano devs personally and Nano foundation. Ugly truths about the Nano team, Nano devs and Bitgrail will come out [12][7]. It could lead to bankruptcy and a total shut down of the project.
>Anyone investing in this documented shitcoin deserves to lose their money. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0
FOOTNOTES:
[1] reddit.com
[2] reddit.com
[3] accenture.com
[4] ccn.com
[5] archive.is
[6] nano.org
[7] archive.is
[8] archive.fo
[9] news.kucoin.com
[10] medium.com
[11] reddit.com
[12] archive.is
[13] reddit.com
Angel Rivera
(Cont.)
[14] reddit.com
[15] nanode.co
[16] quora.com
[17] archive.is
[18] archive.is
[19] nanode.co
[20] reddit.com
[21] reddit.com
[22] →
[23] archive.is
[24] quora.com
[25] quora.com
[26] quora.com
[27] youtu.be
Caleb Johnson
What's wrong with you nano idiots? Do you really have no understanding of what a business analysis and business decision is? Why do you nano morons always behave like children and act like it is something personal?
Isaiah Ross
your first 2 points contradict themselves.. how can it have 750 tps then the next point say 100-200.. Honestly there are issues with the currency but it is new and requires time just like bitcoin. Maybe you should relax a bit and wait till its finish mmk?
Ian Brown
Hey fren nothing person just wanting to know whats up with your copy paste
Kevin Williams
>your first 2 points contradict themselves.. how can it have 750 tps then the next point say 100-200
Different time frame, nano moron. You guys are so stupid you should not be allowed to invest. Nano is bitconnect 2.0 Back to plebbit.
Juan Cooper
this guy actually had all those pastas. holy kek, you are hilarious. excellent reverse troll
Julian Smith
>Honestly there are issues with the currency but it is new and requires time just like bitcoin
Bitcoin has not permacrashed for years, pushed by Italian scammers and insane lies regarding TPS.
> away from the tribalism bs
You are 100% in the nano tribe
Jordan Russell
we appreciate your concern for our finances. thank you brother
Jordan Morales
Your list sucks then if it isn't up to date. Funny thing is that nano is great for investing if you arnt a complete noob - did you get rekt? if you invested at its low its already 150% up
Isaiah Nelson
Nano $50+ 2019
Bentley Evans
You're in the tribe of the fairies my fren
Joseph Morales
Brody Ortiz
>Your list sucks then if it isn't up to date.
Idiot. One TPS number is from DEC 2016. The other from this summer. Get your shit together. Learn to read and process basic information.
Kevin Gonzalez
he's still accumulating or he's a retard and left his coins on Bitgrail or he went all in at $30+
Dominic Long
Why list old info? Tell me what are your picks to invest in? You seem like a passionate guy would be good to hear what you recon will be a better play come the next bullrun. I doubt you'll tell me though
Hudson Collins
>he's still accumulating or he's a retard and left his coins on Bitgrail or he went all in at $30+
More insane lies from you stupid nanoids. You are mental. Thanks for proving once again that Nano indeed is Bitconnect 2.0
Landon Ross
Nano’s relationship with BitGrail, their main trading platform, was incestuous and dirty from the very beginning. However, after “Bomber”, CEO of BitGrail found out that his exchange had been hacked for 80% of their Nano assets in October 2017, close to 10% of total supply of Nano, the relationship between Nano devs and BitGrail became criminal.
BITGRAIL PROBLEMS KNOWN BY NANO DEV TEAM PRIOR TO BITGRAIL CRASH
>Insolvency of BitGrail and missing 10 million nano, discovered and made public by the Nano community [1][2]
>Missing transactions on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [2][3]
>Single transactions replicated multiple times on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [4][3][5][6].
>Millions of Nanos moving out from BitGrail, when the exchange was closed for withdrawals, discovered and made public by the Nano community [7].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to alleged ‘maintenance’.
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to ‘KYC’ excuse [8] [9]. Hundreds of thousands remained unverified [10].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks, due to alleged ‘pending withdrawals’, which were never processed [11].
>Nano withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to node problems.
>Customer support ignores tickets - not just for days but for weeks [12]
>Bomber increasingly unhinged and psychotic. Insults his customers on social media for asking legitimate questions [12]. Nano community expressed concern to the Nano devs.
Ryder Cruz
>Nano indeed is Bitconnect 2.0
imagine being so retarded you cannot tell the difference. fucking LOLOL
Brayden Myers
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (1 of 2)
>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano, do arbitrage between exchanges. [13][7][14].
>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano move assets to safety. Just one of these accounts handled 50million USD [13][7][14][15].
>Insider trading on BitGrail done via accounts connected to Nano Devs. Traded tens of millions of dollars [15].
>Nano dev team used incestuous relationship with Bomber to get instant KYC verification [16], impossible for standard Nano investors.
>Ordinary Nano investors accounts blocked from doing arbitrage, moving assets to safety or doing insider trading, unlike Nano dev team. Stuck with coming 80% loss [17].
>Zack Shapiro (Nano dev): Everything under control. Just too much work with KYC. Not insolvent. (statement made 4 days before BitGrail insolvent) [18].
>Zack Shapiro: No reason to worry, BitGrail doing normal KYC, “scams don’t do that” [19]
>Zack Shapiro: “Yes, you can [trust BitGrail]. I talk to Bomber every day and he’s a good guy. We’ll get it all sorted next week. Just hang in there” [20] [21]
>Zack Shapiro: Confirms BitGrail is a serious business. “Opposite of an exit scam actually” [22]
>Zack Shapiro: BitGrail is “Legitimate. Complying with the laws of their contry” [23]
>Zack Shapiro: “Funds are safe on Bitgrail…Again, funds are safe” [24][25]
>Mica Busch (Nano dev): ‘‘funds are safe, [BitGrails] representative account does not show any suspicious activity’’ [26]
>Nano: “Be assured that your funds are safe” [27][28]
Samuel Jones
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (2 of 2)
>Person who discovered and exposed 50million USD account being connected to Nano Dev team, got later banned from Nano subreddit [13].
>Nano community member who discovered/reported that nearly all nano on BitGrail was missing, was forced to delete initial post titled; ‘10 Million XRB Possibly Missing XRB From BitGrail’ [2] and repost under different headline ‘I need some help with tracing funds’ [1].
>Nano team systematically deleted threads of investors’ concerns and the sharing of new information regarding BitGrail [4].
>Nano dev team confirmed knowing about all BitGrail problems, told investors to relax, and promised a thorough investigation [29][30][28]. ‘Developers are taking care of that’ [31].
Zachary Williams
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITEIS POST-BIGRAIL CRASH
>Nano Dev team claimed to do all they could to investigate and find missing Nano. No update since. Nothing done. [32]
>Nano community did all the work, themselves researching/investigating. [33][34][35] [32][41].
>BitGrail victim group representative, Espen Enger met with Nano lawyer Josh Kleiman in Italy [36]. Details of the deal made with the Nano team is not made known to the BitGrail victims.
>After meeting between Enger and Kleiman all criticism of Nano Dev team became banned on BitGrail victim discord [37].
>Change in BitGrail victim group management. Protection of Nano Dev team and suddenly non BitGrail victims used as hostile mods on BitGrail victim group discord [38].
>Don’t be surprised if Enger gets millions, and/or cushy job at Nano when all this is over. As a big thank you from the shady Nano team.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano foundation and Nano team members. Outside the original BitGrail victim group, now Discord BitGrail/WebCoin Lawsuit [39][40].
Jack Cook
Footnotes to the above Nano -BitGrail Crash (and Nano dev team involvement) –1 of 2
[1] archive.is
[2] archive.is
[3] archive.is
[4] archive.is
[5] prnt.sc
[6] prnt.sc
[7] archive.is
[8] bitsonline.com
[9] archive.is
[10] imgur.com
[11] archive.is
[12] archive.is
[13] archive.is
[14] imgur.com
[15] archive.is
[16] imgur.com
[17] archive.is
[18] imgur.com
[19] imgur.com
[20] imgur.com
Caleb Reyes
>spending all this time on these pastas and actually believing them
this is pure autism folks
Wyatt Flores
Sorry for your loss
Carson Williams
Footnotes – part 2 of 2
[21] imgur.com
[22] imgur.com
[23] imgur.com
[24] imgur.com
[25] imgur.com
[26] archive.is
[27] imgur.com
[28] archive.is
[29] i.imgur.com
[30] i.imgur.com
[31] i.imgur.com
[32] archive.is
[33] archive.is
[34] archive.is
[35] archive.is
[36] youtu.be
[37] imgur.com
[38] imgur.com
[39] archive.is
[40] Google: silvermillerlaw com 2018/04/2018-4-6-DE-1-CLASS-ACTION-COMPLAINT-1
[41] archive.is
Dominic Hall
Zachary Howard
You gotta add this as post (3 of 3) for you next copy and paste otherwise you might get confused
Jonathan Gonzalez
Zack Shapiro
Daniel Edwards
>footnotes 2 of 2
fucking kek, i'm dying bro. thanks for the lulz
Sebastian Martin
Josh Kleiman
Hudson Morales
Espen Enger
Aiden Bailey
meanwhile NANO keeps rising and this guy keeps posting his pastas. this is great
Dominic Ramirez
Elastos
Brandon Garcia
maybe this is the guy who ran Bitgrail?
Isaiah Johnson
While both Nano and Bitgrail leaders told nano investors that Bitgrail was safe and not compromised, archive.is