Accord partners with Corda

twitter.com/AccordHQ/status/1053425651196268544
What does it mean for Chainlink?

Attached: 99BE0cAL_400x400.jpg (400x400, 9K)

it means 1k is fud

Link BTFO. Also, this news hit rebbit half a day before biz. Truly this board is dead

Pajeets killed Jow Forums. There's no reason to try to discuss anything here when there's nothing but dishonest replies. That's not beneficial to anyone who values their time.

If Drunk user is correct the Accord is not ‘all in’ on ChainLink.

But

There was one instance when a ChainLink twitter shill suggested to RGB that Corda would use ChainLink as a decentralised oracle solution and he ‘liked’ the tweet

checked

Corda is another DLT to which Chainlink will be able to connect.

>Accord is not all in on Chainlink

What do you mean ? He told they arent or what ?

just think about it. chainlink wants to do it with cryptocurrencys and shit, fully open, average pajeets running a node, etc. If something goes wrong, no one can be held accountable.
on the other hand corda is doing it a bit more closed, still open source and dlt and shit, but closed enough to be the chosen one for fintech and legal sector.
corda is clearly winning in this game, it's not the first time autists connected the dots that don't exist and later it turned out yeah they really need oracles, but not necessarily decentralised oracles.

I mean...why would corda use chainlink?!
bullshit

>If something goes wrong, no one can be held accountable.
So decentralization doesn't work?

There's definitely someone to hold accountable: whoever selected the nodes.

The centralised systems as the banking sector do not like decentralisation, it makes them useless. So at the first round I don't think they would go for full decentralisation. Thats why I think corda will suppress CL. (and if a big player goes this way, the others will follow like the legal sector)

And sorry for my ignorance, but what do you mean by selecting the nodes? The user will select precisely the nodes? Not that he will just select the amount of the nodes or something like that?

>and if a big player goes this way, the others will follow like the legal sector
Exactly, and this big player (Accord) explicitly partnered with Chainlink.

>And sorry for my ignorance, but what do you mean by selecting the nodes? The user will select precisely the nodes? Not that he will just select the amount of the nodes or something like that?
The user will have total control over what/how many/what type of nodes to select.

For the big players, I meant fintech.
I'm curious. So they partnered with chainlink? (no cl logo on the website tho, only sc) And then why they partnered with corda too? So you say corda WILL use cl? This is 100% by your opinion?

Sc is the company, cl is their product

>I'm curious. So they partnered with chainlink?

Attached: accord partners with chainlink.png (895x617, 75K)

man, it was sarcastic. I know they partnered with cl. The question was, why they partnered with corda too? I still dont know your opinion. Corda is cl competitor or corda will use cl?

ok, good point.

>it was sarcastic.
Lmao, no it wasn't.
You even implied they were partnered with SC, not CL.

>The question was, why they partnered with corda too?
Because corda offers a number of things, including a DLT backbone. Same with a ton of other industry crypto products like Hyperledger.
Chainlink will connect to all of them.

Corda's oracles are an absolute afterthought. No different from any homebrew oracle being used by tons of parties today.

oh this smartcorntract.com and chainlink oracle thing looks good...nwm ill try that another too, cuz im not 100% sure in this one.

I'm still curious, you just stated thing that are known, but they don't mean shit.
I hope u are right I have some stinkies too. I'm not against cl, I just dont want ppl to be blind.

It's very obvious you're completely clueless, so start learning.