Ethereum ICO vs Link ICO

I can despute any fud, come at me

Why are there only 4 devs for a project that raised 50% more money than Ethereum.
How much of this money did they pump into their lemonade stand at ETH SF?

they are working on the aggregation now you idiot. (service agreements set for november 2018) look at the pivotal tracker, but keep playing dumb.

>8tps
>revolutionary
lmao

i hold Link and this does not make me feel good

>I, uh... well you see.... ummmm.... they need it for.... expenses and stuff....

there isn't just 4 devs
theres a lot more on the business side
they pay for good lawyers
barely any

>there isn't just 4 devs
there are.
Steve, Dmitri, Alexis, John
Thomas is an integration engineer.

Thats it. Anyone else who has contributed has done minimal work.

because markets are based on supply and demand you pajeet

when Ethereum ICOd few people understood its significance or potential, and the amount of capital floating around in the cryptosphere (which has largely derived from BTC and subsequently ETH appreciation) was much less.

relative to its positioning in the development and adoption cycle as a whole, it was really a less significant raise, which is quite justifiable.

what was the realistic alternative, hold back even more for the developer and node funds?

The problem is not them raising $32 million, the problem is that they don't use it.
>You can't just hire 40 people and expect to make faster progress on a programming intensive task.
Sure, keep telling yourself that. But if ETH only had 4 devs it wouldn't have launched by now either.