>pumps have massive volume
>dumps have nonexistant volume
Gonna go ahead and put CHAINLINK in the title to get rid of downs syndrome filterfags
Michael Bennett
Austin Flores
Big if true
Bentley Davis
the dumps look about equal to the pumps, which will be more obvious in the next few days
Jackson Sanchez
did you miss the memo or something? We're only fudding when newfags ask about link. Don't fud in actual link discussion threads
Dominic Peterson
>Volume decreasing with each pump on the monthly scale
>hit the bollinger bands on the weekly for the first time ever
>extremely overdue for a pullback or even a reversal of trends
Seems like you got the wrong memo. We're fudding till mainnet.
Adam Butler
go home astro
Jack Cox
temporary
Lucas Hughes
>implying he ever leaves it
Andrew Walker
It’s called loading user
Logan Cruz
>the dumps look about equal to the pumps
lmao, no they don't swingfaggot.
Nicholas Harris
>Volume decreasing with each pump
Wrong.
Outside of the outlier spike from the Bithumb listing, the volume from the last pump was the highest so far.
Swingtraders getting desperate.
Evan Kelly
>almost a week left in this month
just buy back in, it's not going any lower
Julian Morales
i think you didnt get the memo. the discussion has left biz
Kayden Kelly
more discord groups?
Parker Taylor
Checked. 100k bandaids eoy.
Thomas Lewis
>nonexistant
holy shit we're not gonna make it.
Jaxson Morales
LINK will go down in sats, but up in price. BTC bull is coming.
William Butler
?
David Lee
Yes, a whole 4 hours of high volume. I am not talking about the volume of the tiny little pumps. The volume of the uptrend as a whole is decreasing. Outside of those pumps volume is completely disappearing for the rest of the month. And the volume on those pumps was because of partnerships and conferences all revealed this month and with Devcon soon that will be the last one, the news is going to dry up soon and we will see a reversal.
Link will go down in sats but down in USD as well due to people selling for BTC.
Nathaniel Hernandez
careful. hes going to tell you to look at the weekly and monthly chart. Then he's going to samefag the thread to death
Luke Lopez
>Yes, a whole 4 hours of high volume.
24 hours you dumbass
>I am not talking about the volume of the tiny little pumps.
Pumping 25% isn't "tiny little pump".
Anything else you want to be completely and utterly wrong about?
Oliver Wright
No, it was 4 hours of high volume. Go check the charts you stupid little faggot.
Pumping 25% then immediately losing about 85% of your pump as it dumps right afterwards each time means you are actually having tiny little pumps.
Samuel Phillips
That's the case with every coin dump ass.
Jacob Barnes
>No, it was 4 hours of high volume
See pic. 24 solid hours of ~1400 BTC volume.
A lot more if you count anything above 1000 BTC.
>Pumping 25% then immediately losing about 85% of your pump as it dumps right afterwards each time means you are actually having tiny little pump
The pump is the pump, the dump is the dump.
We were talking about the volume of the pump.