If Sergey doesn't reveal a good partnership at Devcon4, we are gonna tank so hard. It's been a fucking year and the only decent partnership outside of the blockchain sphere has been with SWIFT. I can't continue to shill this to people I know IRL and repeat the SWIFT thing over and over again. I mentioned web3 and it was embarrassing when they looked it up to verify.
It's a fucking blockchain company. It aims to "decentralize the web" with it's polkadot blockchain. It's literally a competitor to Tron. Now I'm not saying they wont succeed or web3 wont be huge in the future, we don't know. What the problem is, is web3 a fucking blockchain startup. They don't even have a wikipedia page. Web3 relies just as much on Link as Link does it on it. It's like 2 kikes in Washington scratching each others backs to get ahead. I've looked into the other shit partners Link has like OpenLaw, Consensys, etc they are all blockchain shit. None of them are real world companies with incomes that do business outside of blockchain. They all rely on Blockchain for success, and since Blockchain has no usecase, they all rely on Link to be the usecase for Blockchain as much as Link needs them for their legal work and such and such. It's circular.
When is Link going to get a partnership with a company listed on Nasdaq? When is Link going to get a government contract, even with just a state government? Something big that will have actual money flowing through it. When is Link going to get a partnership with a big 4 accounting firm? I'm sick of these irrelevant blockchain pipedream projects about decentralizing everything under the sun. What are all these "100's of partners" Sergey has hinted it. I hope to god it's something genuine and that SWIFT introduced them too through their network and not just 100 picks from CMC's rankings. I feel like the hype around Link and it's partnerships right now is the same as last year where shit like fucking Dentacoin and ICON were mooning based on nothing.
Jow Forums is an asian girl board you fucking heretical faggot. KYS.
Anyways, my point stands, if Sergey's partnership revelation during Devcon4 is another fucking blockchain startup, we are fucked.
Out of all the blockchain startups Link has, Consensys is the only one with a wiki page, and this is what it says. Keep in mind that Openlaw is a part of consensys.
>Joseph Lubin founded ConsenSys in early 2015 as a software foundry[4] to develop decentralized software services and applications that operate on the Ethereum blockchain.[5] >As of July 2018, The office is located in an old industrial building in Bushwick, Brooklyn and was described by The New York Times as "essentially one large room, with all the messy trademarks of a start-up operation, including white boards on the walls and computer parts lying around."
Zachary Rivera
>I can't continue to shill this to people I know IRL and repeat the SWIFT thing over and over again What the fuck are you doing marine, STAND DOWN
Xavier Long
I want my family and friends to buy into Link and become rich too. My uncle is literally the CEO of a small accounting firm, and my dad owns his own business. Yet I can't convince them to buy into Link. They want more news than a SWIFT demonstration last year and so far I've been able to give nothing substantion.
The only other thing other than SWIFT is Docusign. At least that is a legit company. Web3 is a fucking joke though. The public does not trust blockchain companies. Half the hype of partnerships is a big company comes and invests in a smaller company and helps them grow. Web3 is not a big company. They are doing some open source github crap and they only launched that in August of this year. What is their fucking revenue. Who are web3's customers which will be using Link?
Ryder Adams
>Jow Forums is an asian girl board you fucking heretical faggot.
HAHAHA no its not. Living the dream with you Asian waifu huh?
Nolan Morris
Chainlink is gonna tank so hard. It's been a fucking year and the only decent partnership outside of the blockchain sphere has been with SWIFT. I can't continue to shill this to people I know IRL and repeat the SWIFT thing over and over again. I mentioned web3 and it was embarrassing when they looked it up to verify.
It's a fucking blockchain company. It aims to "decentralize the web" with it's polkadot blockchain. It's literally a competitor to Tron. Now I'm not saying they wont succeed or web3 wont be huge in the future, we don't know. What the problem is, is web3 a fucking blockchain startup. They don't even have a wikipedia page. Web3 relies just as much on Link as Link does it on it. It's like 2 kikes in Washington scratching each others backs to get ahead. I've looked into the other shit partners Link has like OpenLaw, Consensys, etc they are all blockchain shit. None of them are real world companies with incomes that do business outside of blockchain. They all rely on Blockchain for success, and since Blockchain has no usecase, they all rely on Link to be the usecase for Blockchain as much as Link needs them for their legal work and such and such. It's circular.
When is Link going to get a partnership with a company listed on Nasdaq? When is Link going to get a government contract, even with just a state government? Something big that will have actual money flowing through it. When is Link going to get a partnership with a big 4 accounting firm? I'm sick of these irrelevant blockchain pipedream projects about decentralizing everything under the sun. What are all these "100's of partners" Sergey has hinted it. I hope to god it's something genuine and that SWIFT introduced them too through their network and not just 100 picks from CMC's rankings. I feel like the hype around Link and it's partnerships right now is the same as last year where shit like fucking Dentacoin and ICON were mooning based on nothing.
Hudson Sullivan
To be perfectly honest with you I don't fucking care. It was a random pic from my folder. You want a white girl here. I like both anyways. If you are holding Link you better pray to god that Sergey gives us a substantial partnership this conference and not another blockchain turd.
Never EVER talk people into buying crypto IRL. Never talk them into it, never help them buy it, never manage their accounts.
You will not get credit if it goes well, you will get the blame if and when it goes wrong. They will buy the top and sell the bottom no matter what you say, any profit they make will be pure luck and it will only make them more reckless.
Actively convincing your family to buy crypto in 2018 is not a good thing, for you or for them.
Isaac Williams
You want to use my post as pasta go ahead.
Still, someone tell me the different between a partnership with web3, and a partnership with REQ. How would Jow Forums react if at Devcon4 Jez San and Sergey walked on stage to announce that the Funfair casino would be using smartcontracts and oracles provided by chainlink to help run their casino? Would you be bullish as fuck and BUY BUY BUY?
No, because Fun is a fucking shit tier meme project. Just like all the rest of crypto projects are. So what's the difference between a blockchain project with a token, and without a token? Nothing.
Your just angry because I'm actually looking into all of these partnerships now. The endless web3 hype the last weeks has pulled the wool over people's eyes. I bet a lot of Jow Forums anons thought it was a huge company when they announced the partnership, when in reality it's a small company.
Lincoln Garcia
Didnt you hear sergey? They are in talks with HUNDREDS of teams.
Parker Gray
The OP girl you posted was sexy Jow Forums isn't that picky about boobies though. Saying its a Asian girl board is disingenuous
Aaron Robinson
Yeah, here is a list of the "hundreds of teams" Sergey has been working with most likely going by the last few partnerships.
I fucking hope there are some partnerships with banks or other financial institutions that SWIFT can help set up for them, but I doubt it at this stage. If that does happen, it will happen after mainnet once it's been tested for a while to work for all these blockchain shitprojects.
Ian Garcia
There are a lot of posters here that I've seen into asian girls only. I remember back in early 2017 people would shitpost OP's if they posted non asian women.
Jack Hill
Yeah dunno what your saying OP but everytime I explain chainlink to people, they either buy in or become interested in the prospect.
I've recently stopped talking about it. I was nearly close to mentioning it to my boss the other day in a conversation. If he bought in, that would be terrible.
Christopher Morales
If you really are a true marine and not just another discord pajeet then i'm ashamed of serving with you. Do you not know who Gavin Wood is???
Jayden Lopez
Everyone used to post >this girl isnt asian But all those anons retired and left the board with dec gains. So now we're left with anti-asian chubby chasers.
Kayden Clark
no those were just the faggots from /a/ who came here at the peak of the bullrun and then left when they lost everything
Hunter Mitchell
I've gotten my brother to buy in that's all. My brother is doing comp sci so he understands a lot of the tech related shit already so it was easier to get him on board.
Nope. Not a clue. I'm not from a tech background.
Did you hear the story of the presidential election in 1988. All the ivy league intellectuals were certain that Dukakis would win the election, and they were fucking shocked at his loss and that Bush Snr won. It's because of their social surroundings in their ivy league, ivory tower prohibited them from even knowing that most of the nations community didn't like Dukakis at all. They were isolated and in an echo chamber and were in a feedback loop not getting proper data from outside.
I think it's the same with blockchain tech and companies in this space. All the tech fags know all about it, but no one else knows jack shit about it. It's part of the problems I am trying to explain to you about web3, openlaw, accord, consensys, zeppinOS. It's all backend blockchain projects no one gives a shit about, has never heard of before and is incapable of generating hype.
Chase Wood
Gavin Wood cofounded Ethereum and invented Solidity, the smart contract programming language used in Ethereum. Web3 is fucking huge you dipshit.
Gabriel Rogers
Your boomer parents and family aren't going to invest in cutting edge technology, so stop trying to shill it to them. ChainLink is laying the foundational infrastructure for the smart contract space to BEGIN developing real world use cases with your boomer-tier companies. As of right now nothing truly useful comes out of smart contracts beyond deploying tokens. This is still the innovation stage, they can get it later once it's been proven. This is a risky investment, it could fail, but if it wins then we all win. With ChainLink, you just win.
Josiah Gray
Not gonna spoon feed you. You will sell early because you don't understand the implications.
Josiah Powell
My Uncle is the CEO of an accounting firm, his firm could one day be using Link. Why should I not help my family out?
I am still bullish for Link on the long run, but bearish on the short term because so far it can't seem to pull itself out of the blockchain cesspool. But when it does it will go far.
Yeah see as I said before. Tech stuff for tech nerds. From what I have heard from people talking on here Solidity is a really bad programming language, but I couldn't explain to you why. I also think ETH is a giant shitcoin that shits out more shitcoins and will fail. Link being blockchain agnostic is one of the things that kept me on board, because we can move over to Hyperledger or other future smartcontract platforms in the future.
If that's is whats so bullish about Web3 then I am just not getting it. Maybe if Gavin Wood had a huge customer base and millions of dollars to funnel into Link and lots of partners who will be using Chainlink oracles through him and his business. But just having some hyped up prgrammer on board means nothing to me and 99.9999% of the rest of the planet.
Not saying it's going to fail. Gavin Wood is probably a legit genius programmer. He will probably will positively contribute to Link. What I am saying is that from a marketing and partnership perspective I think it's shit and not enough. Link needs solid partnerships with big companies who garuntee that they will have billions of dollars worth of smart contracts flowing through the network daily. Not just one programmer guy who likes it.
Jose Nelson
How is your uncle going to use link? Explain how he will use it. Just try. You really have NO IDEA how it works. Better dig into the tech nerd stuff if you want to make it.
Invest in Vechain if you want partnerships, see how far that gets you.
Nolan Martin
this girl is perfect 10/10 Would bang.
Kayden Perez
> they still believe in the partnership meme This is not 2017 anymore. Everybody working in finance know that "partnerships" don't mean much. All major financial institutions (e.g. SWIFT) have innovation teams whose jobs are to investigate new technologies. The vast majority of these technologies will NEVER be used (and if they do it will most likely be a private/different version). What matters is cashflows: if a major bank announced a large investment into software related to the use of Link or committed to PAYING for Link data THAT would be bullish.
I'm not trying to FUD link in particular (I think it's a great project), but most people in crypto don't seem to get what partnerships entail. Most of the time a partnership is just the head of innovation checking a box.
Isaac Collins
What part of middleware do you not understand? Even if a fully featured mainnet came out today, a company couldn't just switch over to using smart contracts. You can't get big partnerships because there's no enterprise ready infrastructure. The most you get is PoCs.
>They all rely on Blockchain for success, and since Blockchain has no usecase, they all rely on Link to be the usecase for Blockchain as much as Link needs them for their legal work and such and such. It's circular.
It's not circular. They both need to succeed and then adoption can start. Besides, of course all these partnerships are with blockchain companies. Even if companies start using smart contracts, they won't "partner" with link. They look for a ready to use, reliable suite of smart contract software. Link is middleware. Its just one cog in the machine. Don't expect massive announcements that companies will be using link even if adoption happens.
Parker Cox
This.
Think about Netflix user, how could you convince boomers that it's the future of TV when they can't even open a web browser. Nowadays Netflix is a household name and comes built-in in every smart tv but it's no longer a moonshot investment wise...
I have no clue, but my brother did an internship there for work experience and came back and told me half the stuff he did could be automated easily. If Link is the god protocol, then Link will be the one automating it.
Also you are wrong, you don't need to understand the tech fundamentals of something to make it. You just need to buy low and sell high (1k, not a swingtrader). I'm already in the top 1000 wallets. I believe Chainlink will succeed because it reduces the price a lot of companies currently waste on laywers. Money drives success. Having a good coder doesn't mean as much as having something that will save companies money. No financial institution listed on Nasdaq or NYSE is gonna adopt Link because Gavin Wood liked it and partnered with it. They don't give a fuck, and even if they did, how would they justify it to their shareholders? No, they will adopt because it saves on costs. But why is no company willing to say they will adopt, aside from Blockchain shit which is fucking irrelevant. is right, partnerships are a huge meme, they only happen in the crypto space so pumps can happen.
A real fucking partnership, is for example, something like the partnership between Sony and From Software. One larger company with many customers funnels money into the smaller company, the smaller provides a service for the larger (in this case, makes games exclusively for their system) and that satisfies the customers of the larger company. Link and nothing else in crypto has proper partnerships like this yet. It's all smoke and mirrors.
Easton Parker
Link is NOT the god protocol and i pretty much stopped reading there. I'm happy for you that you managed to see the potential and i hope you have a large stack but please stop shilling this if you have no idea what it is that your shilling
Jacob Hernandez
*You're
Matthew Jenkins
Why don't you think Link is the God protocol?
Well if you are right, then I am short term bearish on Link. I think a lot of the price action lately has been a result of partnership hype with web3 and the other partnerships, also anticipation of Devcon4.
I'm not selling, but I wont be buying more either until it dumps. If the partnerships are just with more blockchain related companies the hype will die eventually. I remember people being unironically hyped for Funfair and ICON earlier this year, now look at them.
Link is just a piece in the puzzle. Obviously a very important piece but one that relies on actual blockchains to succeed in order to have any use for anyone. Smart contracts need link to be meaningful but without smart contracts link is dead.
Leo Morales
Can you read??? The title says pretty clearly that it's just a PIECE.
Ryan Rivera
True
William Peterson
It’s not the God Protocol but that’s a great marketing tactic. I guess people claim it’s similar in the way that it’s a decentralized 3rd party that doesn’t hold any political bias.
