>At DevCon4 we are pleased to release the Enclave-ready EVM (eEVM) >Is a C++ implementation of the EVM that can run within a TEE/enclave which has no operating system dependencies and can “run out-of-the-box" in an enclave. >Is “gas-less”, i.e., it does not compute gas during contract execution. >Could execute in an enclave on the node or off-chain. >Released under MIT License. Sounds like chainlink
Obviously it’s not chainlink but it does sound like some sort of competitor?
Anthony Kelly
Doesn't sound like chainlink. In fact this is not good for chainlink. EVM = Ethereum Virtual Machine. The EVM is how smart contracts work, ethereum nodes execute arbitrary code in the EVM and write the results on chain. The whole point of gas fees in ETH are to pay for the cost of executing code in the EVM. As of now that's only meant that tokens could be deployed on chain.
However, they've introduced TEEs that run directly on the ethereum nodes. Do you understand the implications of this? I'll let your mind ponder on that for a bit.
Dylan Rogers
Checked for nice fud.
Cooper Jackson
If there's no gas, the network is easy to compromise?
Joshua Sanchez
Secure enclaves. You just need to pass the data in and out of the contract in a secure way. Hmm...
Juan Green
>MIT
This is Enigma.
Owen Wilson
>MIT license Is chainlink
>smartcontractkit/chainlink is licensed under the MIT License
Xavier Lewis
This. Linkers is in for a hard day.
Christian White
What's preventing you from creating a contract that would consume enormous amounts of gas? One of the testnets was killed that way
Jose Davis
No gas costs doesn't mean free. No compute is free, everything has a cost associated with running.
I wonder what network will offer a decentralized gas-less network of TEE compute nodes...hmmmmm
Jaxon Russell
You send code to all nodes to compute and verify. The limit to the amount of compute is gas. What prevents me from creating a neural network in solidity and destroy all nodes that would attempt to compute this contract code?
Nolan Jackson
Probably by using similar limits as to what's found in the enigma whitepaper.
" Recall that every function is reduced to a circuit of addition and multiplication gates, each of which takes one or more rounds. A node participating in a computation is paid the weighted sum of the number of rounds it contributed to and the operations it performed (addition, multiplication)."
Owen Robinson
read as gas-less, not free. there is still a cost to the computations you are trying to destroy the nodes with, but its not gas. The problem with gas is today x gwei means my computation takes y minutes. Tomorrow x gwei = z minutes depending on network load. No consistency. Gas-less means consistency.
TEE would secure the contract and off chain compute from your attack too
Brayden Turner
This sounds nothing like chainlink you moron.
Asher Martinez
Lol, you think huh? Hilarious, times like this I wish this board gave assigned ids so we could save stupidity like this to call a specific user out. Smh
Noah Young
You're either an idiot or a mildly savvy fudder, lmao. A prayer for anyone who falls for this.
John Russell
you didn't refute him, you're the shiller, then.
Joseph Jones
Guess I must be, huh?
Parker Miller
Agreed
Christian Cox
Wow totally sounds like a replacement for a decentralized oracle network with sgx compatibility just sold 100k thanks friend.
Chase Green
How the fuck is this thread full of fud and not at the top of the catalog? Swing traders are about to have their assholes btfo.