Daily reminder that you need 100k to make it. Daily reminder that none of you fags will be able to run a node because you don't have access to any API data that anyone wants. Daily reminder that even if you did it is not a passive staking process like a fucking chink masternode ponzi.
TLDR none of you poor newfag retards are going to make it.
Other urls found in this thread:
medium.com
docs.chain.link
docs.docker.com
docs.chain.link
medium.com
status.aws.amazon.com
ethplorer.io
ethplorer.io
twitter.com
thanks just bought 100k
>tfw og presibos 6fig link holder with 5k set aside for node hardware when mainnet hits
Going to make it frens
wtf does "make it" mean you retard. how much $$$
fake news. 10k to make it, as always. also, running a node is easy, you don't have to pick any data whatsoever. it's all handled by the smart contract that calls the data. authenticated APIs are going to be integrated into chainlink by the dev team, they will make possible for smart contracts to pay per use of API calls. its fucking easy. with chainlink, you win.
Thanks just sold 100k
>tfw 120k link
one last thing. stop brigading threads on reddit. you're only making it look obviously good. there's a number of us in discord laughing our asses off at how pathetic this board is. you know we're lurking.
I've always wanted to learn more about running a node but fud like this always gets to me. Are you for real user? I'm not gonna sell any of just link stack till $10 at least but is this really as easy as you say?
checked. can confirm OP is 100% correct since I wrote this pasta in the other thread.
these idiots on here are like that ocasio-cortez broad; they think that making it means $20 million dollars sitting in the bank.
i'd be quite happy with $750k after taxes
>t. 10k LINK holder
>tfw 1000 link poorfag
it's insanely easy. furthermore, once mainnet is out, they're going to make an even more comprehensive, fool-proof guide to running nodes. don't worry, you'll be fine. my advice to you, though, sync an ethereum node now so you're ready to go once mainnet goes live.
>there's a number of us in discord
This thread was made by a braindead discord fag. What a surprise!
thanks just bought 100k and API data everyone wants.
Discord is literally lower tier than plebbit. It's namefags AND avatar pictures. The hierarchy goes user > plebbitor > discord faggot
Do you have any links for a guide on how to do this? I can obviously do my own research but I'm wagecucking right now for based Jeff Bezos and would just like something to refer to later.
...
Sure. Here's best link of how to run it on testnet:
medium.com
This is where Thomas gives the easiest to follow guide to running a node on testnet. Follow this.
Here's the general documentation on running a node. More or less it's just a less handholdy version of the medium article.
docs.chain.link
You're going to need something called Docker. It's a program that allows you to run the chainlink node without necessarily installing the binaries on your computer. It ensures that the Chainlink team can push the most updated version of the node to you every time you run it. Check instructions on docker here:
docs.docker.com
Lastly, here's the instructions on getting an Eth node running:
docs.chain.link
Use Parity. It's faster than Geth, and it has a smaller block chain size so it's faster to sync.
docs.chain.link
So to recap, do these four things:
>install docker CE
>install Parity
>run parity through Docker
>run chainlink node through docker
>100k
Wrong linklet, if you actually crunched the numbers you'd know that you need AT LEAST 200k to make it and that's the bare minimum.
you will be nowhere near that newfag. you're looking at maybe $75k a few years from now if all goes to plan.
I accidentally double posted one of the links there, just ignore the last link, the one after it says "Use parity..."
>if all goes to plan and LINK sets in motion the 4th industrial revolution and saves companies trillions of $ across the globe it will be worth 2.5b dollars
sounds logical
literally need 2mil to make it
literally
Discord fags are like redditors who have some kind of superiority complex because they have a secret club that no one knows about even though that secret club is a bunch of low IQ retards.
thanks, just quit the discord server
Thanks user I appreciate it I'll start diving into this tonight.
unironically will
godspeed
In all honestly I don't see the price of LINK being higher than $5 due to the circ supply. ouch.
the fuck you soking I wan some of it....you don't have to actually provide a API you dumb nigger...the node will recieve tasks from smart contract, without you having to do anything fkin nigger
You need the API before the smart contract requests it. Otherwise you can't show the smart contract that you have access to the data it needs.
That's not even close to true.
APIs work by having API endpoints. It's just a URL that the smart contract will feed into the node. The node doesn't care what the API endpoint or URL is at all. It just processes what the smartcontract tells it.
So when do you pajeets think it's going to moon? I want action
chain link is like FOMO: the project, it hits all my psychological insecurities, personally im all in
what's the most irksome fud you would like to dispel?
What fud is irksome about Chainlink?
Just be happy you're in early enough that next year you can lord it over people making threads asking if 10 link is enough to make it.
Agreed
Pissed I've wagecucked all this year to only get 65k
Absolute bullshit
It's not your fault
fud related to chainlinkfund.com and listing services, mostly.
poorfag cope. you losers act like chainlink == the entire smart contracts ecosystem when in reality it is only one Small piece. but by all means keep parroting $1k eoy or whatever you have to do to convince yourself your tiny late adopter stack is going to save you from poverty.
Care to elaborate?
no, i've lost interest.
It's not a small piece by any means. The inclusion of the Ethereum Virtual Machine into a decentralized ledger enabled smart contracts to execute on chain. That was the biggest step forward since Bitcoin to automating real world events, but it's only half of what's needed. Interaction with real world events and data is needed. Chainlink is the only way so far to integrate blockchain smart contracts and real life events/data in a trustless manner. This is the first time in the entirety of history, that a contract could be drafted between two or more parties and not need to be executed by an external enforcer. No need for government, courts, trusted third parties. It's absolutely revolutionary. Chainlink is a big piece. A huge piece. Think big picture here: it's unironically one of the only blockchain projects that actually has a real, sensible purpose. It's not a solution looking for a problem. It's creating an entirely new class of human interaction.
what fud is there about listing services? That they could require registration thus limiting the amounts of nodes any one entity they'll accept, potentially a big systemic risk to any pool staking projects, like linkpool? Other than that I can't really think of any listing services fud I've seen here; it seems like the level of discussion on chainlink isn't up to fudding this yet because they have no idea what you're talking about.
Agreed
Unironically swing trading 38k link rn
Basically that one. Just some fat neckbeard nolinkpooolers yelling at the sky about how linkpool is shit and making up shit tier fud, crying how their nodes in mummys basement will do just as good a job. Kek
I don't really see why it's not plausible though. What reputation provider wants to put themselves at risk by accepting multiple nodes from one source, thus risking collusion via centralization? Unless you're counting on linkpool to stake or a large linkpool token holder though, it's really not a big deal.
Any protections / redundancies (except insuring penalties) offered by linkpool are going to be offered directly through AWS anyway. Linkpool isn't shit, but you guys overestimate how difficult it will be to run a node, and you underestimate how reliable a basement node will be.
Chainlink isn't creating a project that's so complex to run that it prevents decentralization. It's meant to be plug and play, straight forward, with incentives for everyone to play nicely. It's about spreading the data requests across so many nodes that it becomes too difficult/costly for a bad actor to compromise the system. That can't be done without making nodes easy to run.
>not going to make it
I thought you lost interest?
this. faggots who think they'll run a node without a background in compsci are going to be very upset when mainnet drops and they have no diea what to do.
Linkpool will be, for a very long time, amongst the most professional node operators that any reputation provider will work with. There will be less worry about trusting linkpools many nodes, who will likely expose the APIs for their actual infrastructure level uptime to the rep providers, as well as the built in reputation contract metrics that are part of the CL network, than individuals.
Imagine if people told you that running an Ethereum node was too difficult, to just trust the Ethpool service instead. You'd laugh in their face. You only have to download the client and run some command lines, and it works. It will be the same exact thing with Chainlink, except you'll have to register an account and connect your wallet/ fund it with Eth. The process is trivial.
No one said it was difficult, but there are so many brainlets on here who think all they do is run a docker container. No thought for the downtime for upgrade, patch, availability of their eth node, reliability of home grade internet etc
linkpool is a scam
they were shilling hardcore on biz for two weeks leading up to their dex release. several times the exposed themselves as linkpool team members.
don't buy their bags that no exchange wants to list
There's absolutely no justification for believing in this drivel. The instructions are crystal clear. You don't even have to think. The most retarded of NPCs will be able to do it.
The reason they run it in a docker container is to handle upgrading and patching for brainlets. Running it through AWS simplifies it even more.
neet nodes are a pipe dream, we're gonna be lucky if the tokens are even used by the big companies
>inb4 hurr durrr how else would it be decentralized
Even sergey said no one knows how much decentralization is worth, and all the private eth forks show that big companie give little to no fuck about proper decentralization that could result in pumping our bags.
Forcing a company to use the tokens is always the hardest step. I hope we moon on hype alone se we can al cash the fuck out and retire before the reality sets in and correction comes
You’re fucking crazy. I did this shit once and lost my ass. I have to hope eth hits 250 before mainnet
What are the penalties for your eth node being offline? Nothing apart from not earning any reward. I get it, there needs to be a variety of nodes and operators, but my point is the linkpool fud is bullshit and comes from a lot of morons who dont understand what node operation involves
Chanlink will reach $40 a token, minimum.
I based this off a calculation that was basically stating that Chainlinks importance should make it be around a top 5 market coin. Thats because so many coins will need decentralized oracles to run and it will be the spinal cord of the whole ethereum system. Everything that is an ECR20 token will NEED Link to run. And i have high confidence in the Money skelleton taking out insignificant goys like Lumens and shit
Fair enough. The cost of decentralization has yet to be determined, but guarantee that the services who use minimal nodes will be subjected to attacks. They'll get burned for not paying for decentralization, and then over time some balance of decentralization will become the standard.
>no one knows how much decentralization is worth
uh, excuse me
THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT OF BITCOIN AND CRYPTO IS THAT IT IS DECENTRALIZED.
and i have to give ghost from tcr credit for reminding me of that
Again, its not difficult with some knowledge, but pay attention to the those saying "its simple i watched thomas's youtube video" who think that's it. Gonna be a whole lotta spuds going in thinking its easy and losing their linkies.
Come back in 12 months and look for the threads blaming Sergey for them losing their link
Just look through here if you don't trust the uptime of aws.
It's not linkpool fud. It's just a reality check for overhyped linkpoolers. It's a great service, no doubt, but it doesn't do it so well that any arbitrary person can't run a node that can compete with them.
That's not even fud specific to Chainlink node operating. You might as well be talking about how boomers and normies won't get into bitcoin because they'll lose their keys, or send their tokens to a defunct address, or forget their Metamask password, etc. If someone is at that level, then really they are hopeless, but at that point it doesn't matter how easy it is to run a node, because those people will never make the cut anyway.
415 accounts hold more than 100k...10k is enough to make it stop spreading FUD.
I run many aws instances for multiple enterprises, im fine with aws uptime. What happens when they have the node hosted in aus pac syd and the fuji datacentre in pemulwuy has a power failure again. How well will everyone have their az failover designed.
People will lose money if they arent prepared to offer enterprise level availability, and believe it or not, aws doesnt just do it on its own, it has the tooling for 9 9's, but you need to design and implement it properly .
Anyways, you missed the whole conversation, it started at the reputation provider fud, which is exactly that, made up shit
how many accounts hold 400 k...?
I heard the top 20 are million+
The financial gods of 2030s.....
or the more likely situation which is LINK dumps hard at mainnet like every other coin in history
>in b4 this time its different
That is top 100 wallet holders
ethplorer.io
Why would it be unreasonable for a reputation provider to specify too many nodes as coming from Linkpool? If a smartcontract wants to guarantee that the nodes are actually decentralized entities then they should have that opportunity.
i will honestly kill myself if i lose this...
>made up shit
You know how i know its made up? Because reputation isn't finished and literally no reputation providers have made themselves public, let alone give specifics on how they will handle a pool
I was just gonna say to myself looking at the number 1 wallet they have 350,000,010.00 LINK...the extra 10 link would be for a transfer fee correct? So that would mean this amount would move once to someone...now say 10k for a node that would mean 35,000 nodes for an operator that would get that amount all at once...who would need that much information?
Lmao that is true. We'll have to see what happens.
the 350mil are for node providers, some marine probably sent the 10 there to meme them
was going to actually respond but this has to be bait
yea this account sent the 10
ethplorer.io
LMAO they have penis as a coin...absolute troll
wallet 3437 is the most chad motherfucker out there
I did some math and even if link goes to $100 that would mean it would be greater than ethereums market cap right now. $10 is 3.5B assuming circ supply stays the same after mainnet. The thing is I don’t see how this will have a 2.5:1 rAtio with bitcoin anytime soon
I’m top 375 wallet
Hahahahaha glad there are still some true bizraelis out there
$10 is best case scenario realistically. Nobody actually believes it will get to $100 thats just anons shitposting
Oh don’t worry I have cash waiting
I have a question...if alot of anons utilize linkpool, wouldn't chainlink become centralized?
do you also use that screencaps in 0xbtc shill threads?
Yup
They have committed to never have any more than 10% of the network nodes at any point in time
Show me the proof Jhonny.
me too thanks alot!! im gonna put my link stack to work!!
>thinks $750k is making it
Jonny shows no proof. Jonny ain't here for your entertainment. Buy a share and I'll answer any question you have
thanks user all my networth in discord shares.