Do you think bio-haking will be a thing in the next 10 years? WOuld you buy CRISPR related stocks?
I AM SEARCHING FOR A BIG THING MAN, OK? I AM A BUBBLE HUNETR, I AM SEARCHING FOR THE NEXT BUBBLE.
SUGGESTS?
Do you think bio-haking will be a thing in the next 10 years? WOuld you buy CRISPR related stocks?
I AM SEARCHING FOR A BIG THING MAN, OK? I AM A BUBBLE HUNETR, I AM SEARCHING FOR THE NEXT BUBBLE.
SUGGESTS?
More important
Does Jow Forums think OP is a faggot
no user. you are an ignorant who is out of your league? how many genes have you cloned?
>thought so
This will be huge in the 2020's, trust me user
Look also into Gene sequencing machines
who is this semen demon
Can you make CRISPR that certain replaces certain skin colors or nose shapes with cancer?
Absent of a large population of transhumanists, this will barely be a thing - not much different than now.
You would need to invest into transhumanism promoting media ventures first.
Meat out of plant fibres. Meat replacements in general
fucks sake. here you go, faggot
look into synthetic biology, you can de-novo create a DNA sequence of choice.. so instead of "cutting" out a gene from one organism and "inserting" it into another, you can create the gene and insert it.
At the very least there will be the "research market" i.e. universities, that would be interested in buying such a product.
The technology for cloning and gene modification is already developed to a certain extent.
Yes
This technology will be used to extend lives, repair genetic disorders, possibly make organ transplants obsolete, and who knows what else.
We are entering sci-fi world
Biology and biochemistry has a potential to become the next "revolution" in terms of production.
I will come with one example, currently ammonium which is artificial fertilizer, is extraced, it is mined, like any other compound.
The thing is that 80% of the air is Nitrogen (NH2, NH3), bacteria converts this nitrogen into ammonium, which is then secreted.
For the last 50 years, people have tried to utilize this, to create biological production of ammonium, which in theory would be alot easier and cheaper, since we are living in the bottom of an ocean of nitrogen.
But so far we haven't been able to convert biosynthesize into mass-manufactoring - at least not efficiently.
Once we are capable of utilize or emulate bioproduction in general, the world will rapidly change, everything will become cheap af and alot of the mechanics in our world will be replaced by chemistry.
why?>Look also into Gene sequencing machines
Another example;
A deep-sea snail has a shell of iron, it extract individual iron molecules from what it eat and it's surrounding. (kind of like us humans).
Would it be possible to take this method of extracting iron and use it on large scale? probably, it could very well lead to a massive reduction in the price of iron.
You could probably find some other bio-reaction with aluminium, (there is also a bacteria that does something similar with gold).
imagine if you could reduce the material cost for manufactoring a car, spaceship, aiplane etc. by 80%.
Would this change the world?
No crispr does not work on humans.
Fucking idiots.
so do you suggest to split EVRYTHING BETWEEN EDITAS, INTELLIA and sangamo?
Not yet.
Crispr does work on humans..
The problems with Crispr is that an adult human/animal consist of more than a trillion cells.
Crispr work by inserting a gene into a cell, it's not really "scaleable", and if you only manage to insert the genes into a million cells, there is a probability that your immune cells will recognize these cells as "foreign" cells and you get some nasty autoimmune diseases.
This is why Crispr is an experimental tool, if you have an embryo (a single cells) which grows into an organism, you can do crispr there. But that is kind of the extend of it.. so you can gene-manipulate human embryos etc, or easier gene-manipulate crops (at an "embryo" stage), but you can't really use crispr to gene manipulate adult multicellular organisms.