RLC

Who will it be?

Attached: Screenshot_2018-11-15-10-25-54-919_com.android.chrome.png (1080x1920, 414K)

>RLC's MC is now only $26m
>Max supply almost all on the market
>It has unironically better fundamentals than larger projects people shill the fuck out of on here.
>Could 5X and still only get a $130m MC.

What people don't get is that iExec's marketing is targeted towards enterprises, so we don't hear much about it because we, the crypto community, are not their target market. They already secured a major partner with Intel, but it's been forgotten because people in crypto are brainlets. If the space isn't truly dead from the BTC hash war, this has some potential to moon and 5-10x, at least.

Attached: 1535432841570.jpg (2000x1372, 478K)

>announcement of an announcement

It worked for tron

I also agree that its kind of overkill, but if you want to spread the word in the market this is the way to do it. Look at , IBM, Intel, Ubisoft and now this and still at 26m marketcap ???.

>RLC never gets traction from social media

Cringe

MICROSOFT

How will RLC fit in to the picture now that Chainlink does off chain computation? It makes sense for the ETH alliance to co-operate so I believe they are trying to get the best out of both projects. I just can't imagine the details of this. Anyone has any thoughts. Why is RLC not made obsolete by CL? Seems desperate

Please answer how chainlink would verify that computations are correct and not simulated