9000

>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000
>9000
9000

Attached: 52.png (200x200, 4K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ripple.com/insights/much-ado-much-to-do-part-3/
youtube.com/watch?v=ztERyrvyzSY
youtube.com/watch?v=I9HgNs0xoM0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>under 9000

>tfw invested in both LINK & XRP

Attached: images-01.jpg (256x229, 15K)

yooooo why u make this post

Attached: 1537317892734.jpg (474x251, 21K)

because no one with real money looks at biz before posting

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THIS COIN DOES? I HAD 200K A YEAR AGO AND DUMPED THEM ALL BECAUSE THIS PROJECT MAKES NO SENSE.

You're gonna make it

Attached: wat2.jpg (498x508, 22K)

Here's the purpose from Ripple's POV.
ripple.com/insights/much-ado-much-to-do-part-3/

There are other companies like Coil who use XRP for micropayments, exchanges who use it as a base currency, individuals who use the built-in DEX. Basically any use case that requires fast, cheap payments on a reliable platform could take advantage of XRP.

Attached: Capture.png (443x210, 9K)

XLM is going to the mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon

XRP is going to the bathroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom

Attached: 1495834377.jpg (700x400, 40K)

the one true coin.

Attached: 1513243172290.jpg (704x443, 195K)

based Jed dumpin 10 billion XRP coins to pump stellar

will codius use chainlink?

Attached: Link.jpg (680x566, 48K)

9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100
9100
>9100

But why use ripple? Why can't these companies just deploy their own liquidity tokens?

Attached: 1510186246226.jpg (289x292, 23K)

They both will win, it's the perfect coke vs Pepsi setup

Are they going to deploy an unbacked token like BTC or XRP and compete on that playing field?

Most of what I've seen involves pegged tokens like USDC, GUSD, and many others. One problem is that these introduce a huge amount of counterparty risk. The issuer has to maintain the peg, be trusted to maintain enough reserves, and they have complete control over the currency (to censor someone, issue more coins, etc.).

Having this type of central authority will make everyone want to create their own token, thereby killing any chance at adoption. Once we end up with 200 different fiat-pegged tokens, how liquid will they really be? You would still need something like XRP as a bridge between them.

In the end I think unbacked, counterparty free digital assets are just better than pegged tokens. We already have digital fiat, so I don't see a need to recreate them all on the blockchain.

>You would still need something like XRP as a bridge between them.

So why would they use XRP instead of bitcoin?

Not an expert on Codius, but it doesn't sound like it. Here's a good talk that Stefan Thomas gave. He mentions oracles around 13-14 min I think, and then talks a little about how Codius differs.

youtube.com/watch?v=ztERyrvyzSY

Ripple actually gave their xRapid pilot customers the option to use Bitcoin, but they all chose XRP instead. Bitcoin was too slow and expensive, even though it is currently more liquid.

XRP also has a lot of nice extra features that make it great for payments. Things like payment channels, multi-sig, key rotation, deposit authorization, etc.

you'd have to be stupid not to have atleast some of this shit in case it explodes again

Bankercoin absolutely ripping. Ancap faggots in tears.

9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300
9300
>9300

>9200

youtube.com/watch?v=I9HgNs0xoM0

ITS OVER GET OUT